Movies DVDs Music Books Comix TV Games Sports The Hit List Weekly Sweeps at HJ HWJ Blogs
Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Subscribe | About | Donate

Title Search: Advanced Search
         
SpringWidgets
Fandango.com Boxoffice Top 10
Fandango?s Top 10 Box Office Movies!
SpringWidgets
Spiritual Insight in Movies
All other considerations aside, how spiritual is a movie? The scale rates from profoundly spiritual (5) to not at all spiritual (1). Courtesy of HollywoodJesus.com.
 
WAKING LIFE
About the Production


WAKING LIFE
Page 1


This page was created on November 22, 2001
This page was last updated on
May 17, 2005

Return to main page

ABOUT THE PRODUCTION
Click to enlargeThe first challenge for Richard Linklater in beginning WAKING LIFE was to address the issue: "How do you make a film about something that most likely happens entirely in the mind?" The first script was more like "an idea, pages and pages of notes and a working method," Linklater says.

The actual shooting of the live action began in the summer of 1999 and took about 25 days. The crew was similar in size to a documentary crew - Linklater and Producer Tommy Pallotta, using consumer-level cameras (Sony TRV900s and one PC I), and one sound person who was also responsible for mixing.

Linklater and Pallotta agree that there was tremendous freedom and mobility in working with such a small crew. "Whenever you have a big crew, the director spends so much time telling so many different people what exactly he wants, but in this case, it was easy for Rick (Linklater) to pick up a camera and get what he wanted," Pallotta said. "It was the dream way to shoot a movie." Linklater added, "I was back to locations that I'd been at with 100person crews, and this time there were just four of us." The difference was never more apparent than when Linklater and the crew went to shoot the jail scene at a location in Lockhart, TX that he had previously used for THE NEWTON BOYS. "The time we were there before, there were a lot of trucks, generators, a huge production. This time, we just zipped up in a car, filmed the whole scene in an hour and a half and left."

The filmmakers still marvel at one extraordinary feat they achieved while shooting - in one day a total of 22 pages were shot. Typically a production will shoot about two or three pages a day. "It was an intense dialogue day," Linklater remembers "that included the 'dream room' and two other lengthy sections. They were all well rehearsed. We gave everybody an hour and a half to shoot their scene over and over and we just worked through it. We had two cameras, lots of footage, nothing rushed, and pretty soon it's 5 o'clock, we're through and we've shot 22 pages of dialogue. I don't think there are too many films that can do that. It was wild."

The shooting, was limited to three cities - Austin and the surrounding areas, New York and San Antonio. But in keeping with the surreal feel of the film, there are no geographical references. In some instances, there is a bridge that resembles the Brooklyn Bridge, a subway that resembles a New York subway, or a skyline that has the feel of Austin, but there is never a positive indicator of those locations.

Several of the locations that were used had personal links to the filmmakers. To begin with, Wiley's bedroom, to which we return several times, was Sabiston's bedroom in the house he and Tommy Pallotta shared. The always-wavering digital clock that continued to remind Wiley of his dream state was Sabiston's clock. Similarly, Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy's scene was shot at Linklater's apartment in Austin. But, in typical independent film fashion, there were also the less orthodox locales like the one used for the train boxcar scene. For that particular day, the filmmakers actually crawled under a chain link fence to get their shot. "We were so down and dirty," Linklater muses. "It felt like renegade, low-budget film where you could just take locations and steal stuff."

One particular incident while shooting truly summed up the everyone-pitch-in nature of the making of WAKING LIFE. Pallotta describes how he and Linklater had spent a day hanging out of a helicopter while flying over the city of Austin in an attempt to get the footage for the floating sections of the movie. When Linklater reviewed the footage, he found that it didn't have the ethereal floating feeling he was seeking. By a stroke of luck, Pallotta and Sabiston's next-door neighbor happened to be a hot air balloonist. They approached him and he agreed to take Linklater up for a day of shooting where he was able to capture the appropriate effect.

Unlike typical films for which editing would not begin until the shooting is complete, Linklater and his editor Sandra Adair did much of the editing as they went. Linklater found that the order of the scenes presented itself as he shot. He described editing as "waking up in the morning and thinking, 'OK, this scene should go before that one, and here's the new flow.' It was a very intuitive, long process."

It was necessary for the live action footage to be complete and edited before the animation began so that no wasted animation would be produced. Linklater said the making of WAKING LIFE was really "two films in one. A double creative collaboration" that called for a full live action feature and then a fully animated feature. Though Linklater is quick to point out "I don't really divorce the processes. To me, there's this inherent overlap between the content of the film and the look of it. In one phase, you're collaborating with actors, the other with animators."

Once the picture was locked, Bob Sabiston and team stepped up to begin their animation wizardry. Sabiston had long been perfecting his software for just such a project. He first used it for an MTV-sponsored animation contest that earned him a job creating a series of interstitials. When tackling the production of a road trip film called ROADHEAD, with Pallotta, he added color to the software. During the production of Sabiston and Pallotta's award-winning film SNACK AND DRINK, which is part of the permanent collection at New York's Museum of Modem Art, he added bouncing objects into the software. And in preparation for WAKING LIFE, Sabiston altered the software for big movie formats, added the option of using transparent shapes, and fine-tuned the line quality to create the most natural drawn line possible.

Sabiston assembled a team of more than 30 artists, many who he had worked with on a PBS project called FIGURES OF SPEECH. His criteria were simple: "good artists and good people." The graphic team loaded into Linklater's Detour Filmproduction office in Austin, taking over basically every room including the conference room. A host of Mac G4 computers were purchased, and the animation train started rolling.

Each animator was assigned a character that they would work on solely. Linklater likened it to "actors picking what part they wanted to play based on what they were interested in." The process required the artists to "paint," with the use of Sabiston's software, over the live action footage. It was simultaneously artistic - because each artist creatively interpreted the scene in his or her own style, and tedious - because of the amount of time that went into this painting process. It is estimated that each minute of footage required 250 hours of animation.

A point of interest during the animation is that Wiley Wiggins also worked as an animator. Wiggins was part of the original animation team that worked on the scene where he rides the subway, just prior to encountering Speed Levitch on the bridge. The scene was eventually altered - "because Wiley interpreted his character to look as though he were about 12 years old" - but the background that he animated still remains.

It took approximately nine months to complete the graphics portion of the film, leading to a finish just under the wire for the 2001 Sundance Film Festival. When it premiered at the festival, Pallotta says the filmmakers were seeing the final film for the first time right along with the audience. Just the week prior, Sabiston and Pallotta were hurriedly shipping off disks and physical hard drives to Swiss Effects in Zurich trying to do the transfer. Pallotta remembers, "I was having conversations with Sundance two days before it showed saying, 'We may not be able to show this.' But somehow I knew that we'd pull it off." Just hours before the Sundance screening, Linklater, Sabiston and Pallotta were allowed to view a few minutes of the film to check the sound and image on the big screen. The reaction: "It looked phenomenal. We all just looked at each other and said, 'Oh yeah, this is going to be great,"' Pallotta remembers.

Return to main page

Click to enlargeClick to enlargeClick to enlarge
Click to enlargeClick to enlarge
Click to enlargeClick to enlargeClick to enlarge
Click to enlargeClick to enlargeClick to enlarge
Click to enlargeClick to enlargeClick to enlarge

BULLETIN BOARD (rules)
Post your comments -click here

OFFICIAL SITE
Waking Life © 2001 20th Century Fox. All Rights Reserved.