Today I sit here with a big smile on my face. I have that smile because I am doing some research and laughing at what many are now doing regarding the legitimacy of the film The Fourth Kind. I find it humorous because while some applaud certain films like The Blair Witch and Paranormal Activity, some are upset because they think the makers of The Fourth Kind are trying to get one over on the moviegoing audience. Here is all I know: I felt Paranormal Activity was highly overrated, obviously false while following a tired formula, but I come home interested enough in The Fourth Kind to do some research and see what is true and what isn't. This first person account does something many other first person account movies have forgotten about, and uses some originality that causes some of the audience to believe the story they see on screen.

The premise of The Fourth Kind is that we are seeing footage of a study and research regarding alien abductions and tragedies that have occurred in Nome, Alaska. The filmmakers reportedly mix in real footage with dramatized scenes. The style of the film, whether legitimate or not, is unique, fresh, and, even with the subject matter, entertaining. Speculating on whether the events or some of the footage in the film is legitimate or not does not change the interest I had when leaving the theater as to the reality of the film, or the desire to do some research; neither does it change the intriguing questions the movie raises about not just aliens, but evil and the likelihood of the existence of God, and ultimately what type of god is God.

One of the things that leaves some room for speculation is the style of mixing in "real" footage alongside "dramatized" footage via split and sometimes quad screen views. It draws us into the story, and keeps our eyes moving in such a way that at least my brain was working constantly trying to figure out the difference between reality and entertainment, searching for truth and reality or fake footage with the sole intent to entertain. First-time director Olatunde Osunsanmi does a credible job of mixing in footage while at the same time following the supposed real psychologist, Abbey Tyler, played nicely by Milla Jovovich. We also have brief appearances of Sheriff August played by Will Patton. Both do a credible job, and the supporting cast also plays nicely to the story and questions raised by the film.

One of the concepts presented in the film is the visitation to earth some 5,000 years prior to Christ of apparent aliens. This idea is not new, but one of the things the film does is raise the question of God in relation to the alien visitations. The aliens use ancient, dead languages, and when interpreted speak specifically of a savior and of God. In one interesting scene in the movie, Dr. Tyler is asked if she thought the beings were in fact God. She states no because she felt they were void of hope. An interesting concept: if God exists, then hope has to be present and a part of his personality. This is consistent with the aspects of hope presented by Jesus and some of the writers of the New Testament.

Continue: 1 2