Movies DVDs Music Books Comix TV Games HWJ Blogs
Out Now | New This Week | Coming Soon | The Buzz | Index | Archive A-Z

Title Search: Advanced Search
         
now_playingAboutHeader

Incredible Hulk, The (2008)

Release Date:
Friday, June 13, 2008

MPAA Rating:
PG-13

Rating Reason:
For sequences of intense action violence, some frightening sci-fi images, and brief suggestive

Genre:
Action, Thriller

Starring:
Edward Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth, Tim Blake Nelson, Ty Burrell, William Hurt

Written By:
Edward Norton, Zak Penn

Director:
Louis Leterrier

Official Site:

Synopsis:
"The Incredible Hulk" kicks off an all-new, explosive and action-packed epic of one of the most popular superheroes of all time. In this new beginning, scientist Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) desperately hunts for a cure to the gamma radiation that poisoned his cells and unleashes the unbridled force of rage within him: The Hulk.

Incredible Hulk, The (2008) | Review

The Incredible Bore?
efrain gomez

Content Image
Read More @HJ

Reviews:
Jade Giant Is Giant Fun
Yo

The Incredible Yawn
Tim Berroth

Layin' It All Down
Jacob Sahms

Previews:
Trailers, Production Notes, Studio Stills, Overview, Wallpaper
David Bruce, Webmaster

Harnessing the Inner Hulk
Jacob Sahms

Photos:
Photos From The Studio
David Bruce, Webmaster

Why did Hollywood think it was necessary to remake a perfectly fine movie (Ang Lee's Hulk) made only a five years ago? I loved that movie: great entertainment, heavy human drama, stylish cinematography—a good movie. I wasn't even fond of the Marvel Comic character "The Hulk" before the 2003 film, but director Ang Lee made me a fan.

I'm a sucker for awesome visuals, and Lee's Hulk was like a moving comic book, with multiple panels on the screen, cool camera work, and a thought-provoking story. But many folks I know (males, mostly, and comic book fans especially) hated Lee's Hulk because they thought there was too much emphasis on the love story which almost made the movie a "chick flick." I vehemently disagreed of course, causing many a heated debate over coffee and pie about the "harboring anger and letting go of daddy issues" that seethed beneath the stylish surface.

And now Marvel Comics seems to be crying out, "Just kidding, do over!", making a sequel-yet-remake based on the big green character created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, starring academy-award nominated (and sellout?) Edward Norton as the titular character in The Incredible Hulk.

Norton is Dr. Bruce Banner, a brilliant scientist who experiments with some really dangerous, yet possibly disease-curing, radiation technology and accidentally poisons himself, triggering a horrible side effect every time he gets angry that causes him to become an incredible monstrosity with green skin and a hot temper.

While in this hulkish rampage, he accidentally injures his scientist girlfriend, Betty (Liv Tyler), and destroys much of their laboratory before fleeing from the US government to South America. This is all quickly and visually explained in a clunky intro montage, beginning the story with Banner in Brazil, trying to create a cure for his green-gene poisoning. The rest is reminiscent of TV's The Incredible Hulk (1978-1982) series, with Banner as a hitchhiking man on the run, making most of the movie a big chase scene by land, sea, and air. Oh, and along the way, there's a bit of explosion, dialogue, and a climactic battle between the Hulk and a Hulk-clone-gone-wild called Abomination (Tim Roth).

002.jpg (83 K)Don't get me wrong; the movie's actions scenes probably won't disappoint, seeing as there are many thrilling scenes of loud and mindless destruction of city streets among places like Virginia and the poverty-stricken shacks of Brazil. And I do expect some fun action in a movie based on a Marvel comic book; but I usually hope the story closes the deal, making it a satisfying summer blockbuster. In this case, I was disappointed that Norton's character doesn't do much reflection on the "beast within." Bruce learns some techniques to quell and control his anger from a martial arts instructor, but the deeper, spiritual aspects of human nature are brushed aside.

The small spiritual voice of reason in the movie seems to come from Betty, Bruce's girlfriend. She speaks little tidbits of truth about Bruce's condition. When Betty tries to be supportive of Bruce's condition, she says that they can work together to help him control the hulk. But Bruce responds, "I don't want to control it; I want to get rid of it."

It's a simple line, but it rings true in regard to the negative aspects of our humanity. Self control seems to be a foreign concept in an age of indulgence. The path of least resistance is simply giving into our vices, but when we attempt to control our feelings, it seems easier to rid ourselves of the offending feelings.

hulk034.jpg (141 K)However, emotions and the ability to choose to work toward discipline and self control are a part of being human. No matter how hard we try, we're stuck in this fallen nature, and we have to work hard to quell the beast, doing right in self control.

The Bible has much to say about anger and how it can lead to both physical and spiritual destruction when we are controlled by it. The apostle Paul acknowledges our humanity when telling the Ephesians to "be angry and do not sin" (4:26a). But he advises that we must move past it and make things right, with ourselves and with our neighbor.

hulk033.jpg (138 K)In the film, Bruce refuses to admit that the Hulk is a part of him, and Betty reminds him that he is still a human beneath the green exterior; he can still control the rage and do the right thing. But not before he takes care of some spectacular mid-town brawling with the bizarro Hulk.

I guess I've answered my own question: Marvel thought it was necessary to take matters of the Hulk into their own hands and make a movie more faithful to the original comic storyline, creating a typical, ho-hum story which included less talking, less thinking, and more "HULK SMASH!!".

Copyright © 2008 Hollywood Jesus. All rights reserved.
38.103.63.61