|
|
JURASSIC
PARK III
The
film is basically about the horrors of family breakup. The dinosaurs
represent the psychological traumas that the children of feuding
parents must unfortunately face.
-Review
by David Bruce
With a review by MIKE FURCHES
|

JURASSIC
PARK III
(2001)
This page was created on July 19, 2001
This page was last updated on
May 17, 2005
|
|
Directed by Joe Johnston
Original story by Michael Crichton
Writing credits: Peter Buchman, and Alexander Payne, & Jim Taylor
Sam
Neill .... Dr. Alan Grant
William H. Macy .... Paul Kirby
Téa Leoni .... Amanda Kirby
Alessandro Nivola .... Billy Brennan
Trevor Morgan .... Eric Kirby
Michael Jeter .... Udesky
John Diehl .... Cooper
Bruce A. Young .... Nash
Laura Dern .... Dr. Ellie Sattler
Taylor Nichols .... Mark Degler
Mark Harelik .... Ben Julio
Oscar Mechoso .... Enrique Sarah
Danielle Madison .... Cheryl Logan
Linda Park .... Hannah
Produced
by Larry J. Franco (producer), Kathleen Kennedy (producer), Steven
Spielberg (executive producer), David Womark (associate producer)
Original music by Don Davis, John Williams (theme)
Cinematography by Shelly Johnson
Film Editing by Robert Dalva
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for intense sci-fi terror
and violence.
|
|

Teaser
QuickTime (3.5
MB)
Trailer
QuickTime
47.4
MB 28.6
MB 12.7
MB 5.87
MB RealVideo
low
bandwidth high
bandwidth
Trailer #2
QuickTime
24
MB 14
MB 6
MB 3
MB
TV
Spot
QuickTime 4.19
MB
Clips
RealVideo low
bandwidth
|

Jurassic Park III:
The Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
John Williams and Don Davis
1. Isla Sorna Sailing Situation 2. The Dinosaur Fly-By 3. Cooper's
Last Stand 4. The Raptor Room 5. Raptor Repartee 6. Tree People
7. Pteranodon Habitat 8. Tiny Pecking Pteranodons 9. Billy Oblivion
10. Brachiosaurus On The Bank 11. Nash Calling 12. Bone Man Ben
13. Frenzy Fuselage 14. Clash Of Extinction 15. The Hat Returns/End
Credits 16. Big Hat, No Cattle - Randy Newman
|
|
This
Time It's Not Just A Walk In The Park!
|
|
STUDIO
SYNOPSIS:
Anxious
to fund research for his new theory of velociraptor intelligence,
renowned paleontologist Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) is persuaded
by a wealthy adventurer (William H. Macy) and his wife (Tea Leoni)
to accompany them on an aerial tour of Isla Sorna. This infamous
island, once InGen's site B, has become both a primordial breeding
ground for John Hammond's magnificent creations and a magnet for
thrill-seekers eager to encounter them.
When
a tragic accident maroons the party of seven, Grant discovers the
true reason his deceptive hosts have invited him along. In their
perilous attempt to escape with their lives, the dwindling group
encounters terrifying new creatures undisclosed by InGen, and Grant
is forced to learn the dreadful implications of his raptor intelligence
theory firsthand.
© 2001 Universal Pictures.
|
   |
|
REVIEW
Family Chaos Monsters
by David Bruce
|
|
FAMILY
BREAKUP
The film is basically about the horrors of family breakup. The dinosaurs
represent the psychological traumas that the children of feuding
parents must unfortunately face.
Director
Joe Johnson flawlessly sets the quick 90-minute film in the context
of a classic B-movie with his typical genius.
In
this incarnation of Michael Crichton's Jurassic Park idea we are
introduced to come new characters. The focus is 14-year-old Eric
Kirby whose parents, Paul and Amanda, have split apart. The story
opens with Eric and his mother's new boy friend doing a promotional
shoot, parasailing over the forbidden island of Isla Sorna which
is the location of the doomed theme park of Jurassic Park II. Some
how we know that this whole new relationship is not going to fly
(all puns intended). Some how we know that there are monstrous problem
to be encountered. Somehow we know that Paul and Amanda will have
to face the chaotic consequences of their broken commitment.
Eric
and his mother's boyfriend parasail through some fog (a classic
horror film device) and when they emerge, they look down to discover
that their tow boat crew is gone, blood everywhere. They are forced
to glide down and land in the forbidden island.
From
a psychological point of view this film is loaded with metaphors.
The boy friend is the first to go -devoured by monsters. Eric, with
childhood resilience, finds refuge inside the tank of a wrecked
water truck. He goes into total isolation from every one, and has
to learn how to survive on his own. And so is the plight of the
children of divorce.
|
|
THE
ROLE OF CRISIS
The film cuts to America. We are introduced to paleontologist Alan
Grant who is seeking Grant money (all puns intended) for his research
into prehistoric raptor communication abilities. Listening to his
promotional lecture I realized the wonderful economy of words in
this film. Every spoken line contributes directly to the plot.
In
the very next scene Paul and Amanda offer Alan an enormous sum of
money to fly them over the forbidden island. They pose as tourist
in search of high adventure. Alan is seduced into the deception
of the parents, who do not tell him of the their true intentions
of locating their son. The
dynamic going here is that crisis, not only separates people (family
breakup), it can also bring people together (the search for a lost
child). Paul and Amanda have come back together out of a common
love for their son. And, they have even become coconspirators in
a deception to find their son.
A plane
is charted and the group of seven people is off. The plan is to
fly low around the island. But, as you might imagine, the plane
crashes on the island in the midst of chaos.
|
FAMILY
CRISIS ALWAYS INVOLVES OTHERS.
The team consists of the parents, Alan and his assistant, the pilot
and two crewmembers. Their journey on the forbidden island begins.
Along the way the chaos monsters eat a few of them. The principle
here is that family problems impact a larger group of people than
just the immediate family. Our forbidden island choices (deception,
divorce, money seduction) can adversely affect the lives of other
people. We are never alone on our islands of supposed isolation. There
are consequences to our actions -we truly reap what we sow. |
|
THE
STOIC INDIVIDUALIST
Paul is an individualist in the classic vein of Indiana Jones, Clint
Eastwood, and John Wayne. He is what scholars of culture call the
American Adam. This arch type is also found in England's Sherlock
Holmes and James Bond. He is the stoic individualist that we depend
upon to lead us out of chaos.
His
counter type is Dr. Ellie Sattler (the Laura Dern character from
previous episodes). She is now married and has children. She is
not a stoic individualist. She has ascended to the ranks of motherhood
and community. Guess who will be the ultimate savior at the end
of the movie? Indeed, the individualist will shed his stoicism and
reach out to community (the mother image). This reaching for the
mother image can also be found in Spielberg's A.I. Artificial Intelligence,
both in concurrent release.
|
|
|
STATE OF THE ART MONSTERS
The special effects are as good as they can be. You will not be
disappointed. And indeed, most people go for the dinosaur action.
Only a few strange people, like myself, go for the deeper meaning
and cultural relevance.
|
|
|
RESTORATION
THROUGH COMMUNITY
By weathering the storm, the victory is won. The husband and wife
worked together. The individualist and the Dr. mother worked. Together
they defeat the chaos monsters. By working together the family is
restored. The bottom line in this film speaks a noble truth. United
we stand and divided we fall. Hmm, isn't that what Jesus once said?
|
Review
by
MIKE FURCHES
mike@furches.org
Web site www.furches.org
Mike is the Senior Pastor at United at the Cross Community Church
in Wichita Kansas. United at the Cross is a church made up of
individuals not often accepted in other churches. The church consists
of former gang members, drug addicts, prostitutes and others. Mike
also speaks nationally on various topics and is a freelance writer.
To learn more about Mike and his ministry link onto www.furches.org.
In the arts Mike has worked with top music artists such as Steppenwolf,
Marshall Tucker Band, Kansas and has an active interest in film.
Mike is pictured with his music band "Route 66." His
reviews include The Mummy Returns.
Amistad, The Apostle,
Armageddon, The
Cell, Hurricane, Dr
Dolittle 2, ELO -Zoom, Frequency,
The Patriot, Pearl
Harbor, Rush Hour 2, Shrek,
Extreme Days, The
Last Castle, Serendipity, Ali,
Reversal, Harry
Potter, Lord of the Rings,
Jimmy Neutron, Mothman,
Black Hawk Down
|
|
I am
a fan of Michael Crichton and have read most of his books. The original
book, Jurassic Park was laced with excellent concepts and Biblical
truths as was the second book. Somewhere along the line, the movies
lost much of the influence of the books and while it is generally
said that books are never as good as the movie, I have found that
to be a generalization and not always true.
There
was a great deal of hope since the 3rd segment would pick up where
the first two movies left off and address some of the material left
out in the first two movies. While there were several fun aspects
to the movie and some good message themes I still felt somewhat
disappointed.
One
note of comment here has to be made in regards to the many parents
who take their children to the movie thinking that it is going to
be fun family fair. This movie, in many regards, is no different
than the first two. While there is a worthwhile story line the movie
does include large, scary, dinosaurs that choose on occasion to
eat people. It is scary and gross at parts and I would strongly
discourage parents from taking very young children. Please listen
to this caution before taking your children, paying for a movie
ticket, and then getting up and walking out in the early scenes
of the movie. This will save you money and the other patrons will
not be distracted. While Planet of the
Apes for example leaves a lot to the imagination, JP III does
not and there is ample violence in the film.
There
are a number of things in the film that I appreciated within the
story line. The concept that we can not escape our past is evident
in JP III. Dr. Alan Grant is once again taken back to his past to
deal with the horrors that he once experienced. It is a good thing
that he is along. Due to his experience of having to fight and survive
the attacks of the enemies, the dinosaurs he offers the viewers
as well as characters of the film some hope. This time he has a
rag tag group that he is largely responsible for having to help
and lead. JP III and its portrayal of Grant in many ways portrays
the way Satan can use our past to deceive us and cause us to focus
on things that we would just as soon forget.
Along
the way Grant leads a family in the search of their lost child.
Eric, played by Trevor Morgan is a young boy para-sailing off of
the cost of Isla Sorna, Ingen's Site B. While para-sailing with
his mothers new boyfriend, tragedy strikes and the two eventually
end up on the island with all of the dinosaurs. Eric's parents,
played nicely by Téa Leoni and wonderful character actor William
H. Macy obtain the services of Udesky, played again by another wonderful
character actor Michael Jeter of The Green
Mile, The Boy's Next Door and other wonderful films. Their deceptive
methods take this Enid, Oklahoma couple into the horrors of mans
attempt to, as Grant puts it, "play God." As a result of men pretending
that they know best others have to suffer for the foolishness of
those who thought they were wise.
The
consequences of man's attempt of playing God are wonderfully portrayed
in the concept of Jurassic Park III. It is a concept which we are
addressing now in our world with the concepts of cloning and genetic
research. While 10 years ago JP III would have been perceived as
being Science Fiction it could now be perceived as being Science
Possibility. If we are reminded of anything from this film it should
be that we can not improve on the creation of God. When God made
the earth he saw each part of the creation as being either "good"
or "very good." Through man's attempt at mirroring God and taking
things into our own hands we see the consequences that ultimately
can lead to distraction. From this perspective the JP films address
real issues that face our world each day.
Another
theme strongly portrayed in Jurassic Park III is the tragedy of
the break up of the family. Only the threat of loosing a son can
bring a family back together. It is from some wonderful scenes that
we see Eric's mother and father, Amanda and Paul, noticing each
other and depending on each other that we as the audience wonder,
why did they ever break up to begin with? Later on in the film,
Eric is even surprised that they are working together to rescue
him. If they had only shown that type of love earlier than maybe
he would never have been in the danger he is in the film. This also
mirrors the horrors and effects in our world that exist in part
due to the break up of the family.
There
are a number of other plot twists along the way that keep the film
moving along and the movie even throws in a shock scene now and
then. It is also nice to see Sam Neill back in the JP series along
with Laura Dern. Both actors do a decent job of reprising their
roles although I would have preferred they been in the film even
more, especially Laura Dern. That is due in part to the 90 minute
time of the movie. This film could have been tied together much
more nicely with an additional 30 - 45 minutes.
While
there are some redeeming value and messages to the film I was still,
non the less, frankly disappointed. The story was not developed
nearly as well as the earlier two films and I never thought they
were exceptional films. JP III is still a fun film but, just that,
a fun film with some descent value traits being portrayed.
JP
III is certainly worth waiting for seeing at the discount theater
house. On a scale of 1 - 10 an o.k. 5.
|
|
include("inserts/comments_bottom_short.htm"); ?>
INTERPRETATIONS
Subject: Jurassic_Park_III
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001
From: Eldon
Whether
or not the author intended it to be mainly about the horrors of
family breakups, there is nothing wrong interpreting it that way.
Often our interpretations can go beyond what is intended and adds
to the art.
Eldon
FLAWED
BUT GOOD
Subject: Jurassic_Park_III
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001
From: Keith
It,
would`ve been more realistic it the T-rex delivered a fatal blow
to the sail, but we wouldn`t know it until it, dropped dead, just
as it was about to eat someone, ala J1. I liked the fact, that Grant
. transformed from; "Dr. Grant" to "Alan" during the film. sent
with joy and love!
http://community.webtv.net/KeithWK/PSALM45 http://community.webtv.net/KeithWK/Thepottersclay
HYPOCRITICAL
PARENTS
Subject: Jurassic
Park III
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001
From: "Tim and Carol Hampton"
Is
there something wrong with movie theaters in themselves? My 19 year
old bofriends parents refused to let him watch Jurassic Park III
at the movie theater after repeatedly watching the other two on
tape a home. Isn't that hypocritical??!! They say movie theaters
are bad. Please reply, with Chistian info.
Response:
Honor parents and house rules, no matter how hypocritical. Parents
make so many stupid mistakes. But God bless them, it's a tough job.
-David
JP3
REVIEW
Subject: jp3
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001
From: Taisha
um,
except it was just really dinosaurs eating people....
DITTO!
Subject: Jurassic_Park_III
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001
From: Kevin
I
like the film.
And I agree, the films main point is about family
http://community.webtv.net/KevinKunz/JESUSTHEWAY
|
OFFICIAL
SITE
Jurassic Park III © 2001 Universal Studios
. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
| |
|
|