Movies DVDs Music Books Comix TV Games Sports The Hit List Weekly Sweeps at HJ HWJ Blogs
Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Subscribe | About | Donate

Title Search: Advanced Search
         
now_playingNow PlayingHeader


 
The heart of the film is to be found in lengthy sequences about two violent men—one in the United States, and one in Norway—who not only voluntarily confessed to previously unsolved crimes, but who did so as the result of profound conversion experiences. The connection between the two? As director Chey would have us believe, it's the fact that conversion and confession for these men followed screenings of The Passion of the Christ.

(2004) Review by Greg Wright 

This page was created on December 2, 2004
This page was last updated on December 2, 2004

SYNOPSIS

On top of the recent wave of controversial documentaries, including Fahrenheit 9/11, Outfoxed, and Supersize Me, comes a new documentary feature film that explores the most explosive movie of our time, The Passion of the Christ. The film goes into limited release in Sacramento, California, December 3.

Impact: The Passion of the Christ takes viewers around the world to England, India, Japan, Norway. Directed by award-winning Christian filmmaker Tim Chey, the movie uncovers the controversies surrounding The Passion of the Christ. "This is not a documentary film—it's a commentary film," says director Chey. "It will show the wonderful and absolutely powerful impact The Passion made in people's lives around the world while at the same time uncovering the controversies that surrounded the film."

"I did this movie to glorify Jesus Christ and show how the world is being changed through Him," says Chey. "It's jaw-dropping what is taking place as the Gospel continues to spread and revivals take place throughout the globe." Chey flew to London, Tokyo, Oslo, Bombay, Seoul, Bangkok, and throughout the United States documenting and interviewing people about the impact The Passion made on them as well as focusing on whether the film was anti-Semitic. "I interviewed a neo-Nazi in Norway who turned himself in two hours after seeing The Passion," says Chey. "Clearly something's at work at here. This man went from hating everyone to loving everyone."

"If The Passion of the Christ does not get nominated for an Academy Award next year, it will reveal the true bigotry against Christians in Hollywood. No other movie in motion picture history has made such a positive and life-changing impact—no movie, period."

Review by
GREG WRIGHT

hjpastorgreg@hotmail.com

Pastor and Tolkien Scholar.


Greg Wright is the author of Peter Jackson in Perspective: The Power Behind Cinema's The Lord of the Rings, and holds degrees in Theology, English Literature and Computer Science. 

It's hard to know what to make of Tim Chey's Impact: The Passion of the Christ. On the surface, it seems to be a documentary about the global impact of Mel Gibson's powerful film about the last hours of Jesus, but we don't have to screen much of Impact to figure out that the film's agenda is lot broader than that, and a lot shallower, too.

The heart of the film is to be found in lengthy sequences about two violent men—one in the United States, and one in Norway—who not only voluntarily confessed to previously unsolved crimes, but who did so as the result of profound conversion experiences. The connection between the two? As director Chey would have us believe, it's the fact that conversion and confession for these men followed screenings of The Passion of the Christ.

Chey's position about the two incidents tells us a lot about his agenda and about his film. There's no denying that Chey has his facts in order; but just as with Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, Impact's blithe reductionism and leading questions want us to conclude that seeming cause-and-effect translates into incontrovertible proof. That is: if two men, a world apart, can both have their lives so profoundly affected after seeing Gibson's movie, then the power of the film is undeniable. By this same logic, only two cases of Jew-baiting following screenings of The Passion would just as conclusively prove that it fuels anti-Semitism. And I seriously doubt that such a bandwagon would be one on which Chey or his own collection of talking heads would jump, even if such facts could be marshalled. Such selective "support" for one's contentions just doesn't demonstrate good thinking, whether it comes from the right or the left.

Yet Impact does us the service of pointing out a remarkable truth: that faith, not film, has the power to change lives. The conversion experiences studied by Impact seem genuine enough, and are of a type easily correlatable in hundreds of contexts divorced from Mel Gibson or Hollywood. And the stories Chey presents are not ones we're likely to see covered on the nightly news—which is too bad.

At the same time, the sequences highlight the primary weakness of the film: dozens of anecdotes only marginally connected to The Passion of the Christ, and precious little analysis of the actual movie. We visit a Jesus rally in London, for instance, at which a man says, yes, of course, he saw Gibson's movie and found it powerful.

So what? The same would be true at just about any Christian rally in just about any corner of the world right now, and Chey's tenuous connection between the two demonstrates nothing meaningful about the relation of The Passion and developments in world religion. Does the fact that Rachel Scott's parents loved The Passion warrant dragging surveillance footage of the carnage at Columbine (not to mention police file tapes of the killers) into a discussion about Gibson's film? I don't think so. But like Michael Moore, Chey sees his work not as a documentary, per se, but as "commentary." So apparently Chey, like the more experienced and sometimes entertaining filmmaker whose style he mimics, one-ups the chutzpah of Bowling for Columbine. In my book, that's not necessarily a recommendation.

To be fair, it does seem that Chey is content with instigating discussion, and does not presume that he's capable of nailing down answers. He presents enough conflicting ideas, for instance, about the role that Hollywood has played in bringing movies like Natural Born Killers, Kill Bill and The Passion of the Christ to the screen that just about all sides of the culture debate will find fodder for their arguments.

But Chey's commentary is most effective—and affecting—when dealing with the impact of real human issues like contrition, repentance and regeneration, not when Impact relentlessly (and rather haltingly) documents evangelistic sideshows and opening-day queues. There's something to learn here, but the lesson really has little to do with Gibson's Passion.

Or does it?

"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? ... And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." (I Corinthians 6:9-11)

Your Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal thoughts?  I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.  I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
Click here

OFFICIAL SITE
Publicity information and images © 2004 Fallen World Productions. All Rights Reserved.

No other uses are permitted without the prior written consent of owner. Use of the material in violation of the foregoing may result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Credits and dates are subject to change. For more information, please visit their official site.

Hollywood Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.

Sign up here