|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on April 26, 2001
|
MOE
WANTS TO KNOW
Subject:
STIGMATA
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001
From: Moe
Hi my name is Moe!! I would like to know if anybody found out about the
what this "Lost Gospel" says from A to Z. Also, is it related to any other
coming Prophet after Jesus Christ to bring another Law that confirm all
other messages before (ex Torah, Gospel...)??
Thank you very much! |
|
SATANIC
HEADSETS
Subject:
God got his viewpoint in this one!
Josie_and_the_Pussycats
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001
From: NL
It particularly
suggests that could be the case with all these "Virtual Reality"(VI) headsets
that all the concert goers use to listen to Josie's concert at the end.
It seems to suggest that Satan may be using VI as his tool for subliminal
programming. I have heard that to be the case. One acquaintance says he
will never wear those VI headsets. And I don't think that I will either.
NL
Response:
Are you serious? I hope not.
|
|
MORNONS
TO HELL
Subject:
MY THOUGHTS Mithras
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001
From: "Tom Fenlon"
Anyone who
can maintain Christian beliefs when shown the facts is unworthy of life.
May you and all like-minded morons die immediately and suffer forever
in your hell.
Response:
Your compassion toward others who think different than you can use some
fine tuning. You seem to have some rage going on. Why is that? Looking
forward to more communication with you. -David
|
|
IT
IS A NATURAL THING
Subject:
Bridget Jones
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001
From: Janette
Your reviewer
focuses only on the negatives, that Bridget's fear of being alone drives
her into unhealthy relationships with men. She is certainly more desperate
for male attention and affection than is healthy. On the other hand, it
is natural that a young woman wants to meet a young man, fall in love,
and get married. On that level, Bridget is living out the desire God planted
in most people to find a life's partner. Her methodology (making herself
sexually available for exploitation) is faulty. Her motivation (desiring
a life partner who loves her) is just fine. Mark Darcy's statement to
Bridget that he likes her just the way she is makes him the right choice,
because he's not requiring her to compromise herself to meet his selfish
needs, he's offering her unconditional love. She grows in self-respect
through the movie, so that she is able to turn down the manipulative,
self-centered man and finally turn to the man who quietly offers her respect
and friendship as well as romantic love.
The self-loathing
aspects of Bridget's personality -- her obsession with her weight and
appearance, her striving to recreate herself in the image that the media
promotes -- are the objects of satire in this movie, which means that
the underlying message of the film is against those self-destructive tendencies.
Making people (especially women) laugh at qualities in Bridget that they
recognize from their own experiences encourages them not to continue to
be bound by those qualities.
Yes, there
is a sadness in the portrayal of Bridget, because there is a sadness in
all good comedy. The laughter is an antidote to the things that make us
sad; the laughter helps us leave those things behind. Bridget Jones's
Diary, in my opinion, is skillful comedy subverting the values that lead
lonely women into harmful relationships with self-centered men. Bridget's
sexuality does not offend me; although Christians accept that we must
reserve sex for the marriage relationship, Bridget's desire for sex is
no different than our own. The bawdy and earthy elements of the screenplay
did not bother me; God created us embodied creatures, and we ought to
get all the joy we can out of our bodies, within God's wise guidelines
that keep us from harm and exploitation. I am much more offended by the
violence in many movies in which HJ finds merit than by the sexual misconduct
in this movie, which at least springs from relational qualities built
into humanity at creation. Bridget's longing for a man who is willing
to make a commitment is God-given; it's the desire God planted in Adam,
which made him exclaim with delight when he met Eve: At last! Here is
flesh of my flesh and bone of my bone. I was happy to see Bridget at last
end up with a man who delighted her and whom she in turn delighted.
By the way,
Bridget Jones's Diary is hung on the basic plotline of Pride and Prejudice,
by Jane Austen, a nineteenth century author who had a thoroughly Christian
vision of human relationality. It's not actually biblical for this review
to hint that lonely people should not seek to meet their emotional needs
in human relationships, particularly marriage, but should spiritualize
it into creativity or devotion to God. Those are good things, too, and
we should devote our energies to them. But God did create us beings who
long for each other's companionship, and he gave us each other as companions.
The fact that Bridget has sexual longings for men and that she is seeking
for one man to establish a loving sexual relationship with is a virtue,
not a flaw, of this movie.
Janette Kok
Response:
You resonate with the character. You are correct in your assessment of
Bridge Jones. I like the way you analyze. Your criticism of me, however,
is a bit sharp. I am in agreement with most of what you say. I sense some
real passion in you towards this issue. In terms of loneliness, I believe
it is a complex issue that involves self, others AND God. The answer to
loneliness is more than just finding that special someone to meet our
physical, sexual and emotional need. No one person can do that. Nor should
we expect them to. Additionally, loneliness can be a very positive thing.
It is not just a negative thing. -David
|
|
CONFUSED
Subject:
confused
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001
From: "Chris P."
Dear David,
I thought your site was a Christian site until I saw the movies and videos
that you promote, I really think you you should take the Mighty name of
Jesus out of your advertisement.
Follower of Jesus Christ, Chris P.
Response:
Reviews are not promotions. -David
|
|
REPLY
TO LAUREN
Subject:
BlairWitch 2
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001
From: Jon
Lauren--
The secret of esrever (reverse backwards--get it?) is where to find the
stuff. The Further on the grave is is right, but your others aren't. We
found that in the scene where Tristen imagines killing the baby, there's
a shadow of the stick-doll that floats over the water. And when Steven
leaves the room after telling Tristen that they'll leave adn she says
no, a rug is visible from outside the room where there is no rug inside
the room. We didn't find the mirror or the door yet, so if you find out,
let us know.
|
|
ABSOLUTELY
AMAZING
Subject:
The Most Human and yet the More Divine JESUS!
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001
From: Gary A. Valenzuela
Absolutely
amazing!, a new and fresh (not to say modern) approach to the figure of
Jesus.
This is
the best audiovisual Jesus I've ever seen. I liked the way they do it,
specially showing us a real HUMAN person, without giving up on their divinity
or spirituality. This is a labor of love.
This will
remain in my memory as the best retelling of the story of Jesus. The "bird
incident" is one of my favorites! Congratulations to the director and
his crew, and of course all the actors who take part on this GEM!
On the sadly
note, I saw the edited version, I hope someday I could watch all the deleted
scenes from this miniseries.
THIS is a
JESUS you can relate to. Playing, Dancing, Laughing and Smiling are nice
touches that reconciles us with HIM, and show us that WE are not far from
HIM.
Gary A. Valenzuela
La Paz - Bolivia (South America)
-- "We don't do it for the glory. We don't do it for the recognition.
We do it because it needs to be done. Because if we don't, no one else
will. And we do it even if no one knows what we've done. Even if no one
knows we exist. Even if no one remembers that we ever existed."
*** Supergirl (Kara Zor-El) *** Christmas With The Superheroes #2 (Dec
1989)
|
|
GREAT
MOVIE, GREAT CD
Subject:
O Brother Where Art Thou
oh and a darn Good Review from David as always
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001
From: The Muters
Per Usual
you have done a wonderful Job of hitting the nail on the head with the
movie O Brother Where Art Thou, you speak truthfully about the movies
redeeming qualities but do not hestiate to mention that as with all movies
there are things that we would not want as part of our lives as Christians.
But lets face it folks this type of film is more real life than we would
like to admit, as a matter of fact it reminded me of a living parable
really, because just like the Bible it shows the ugly side of humans while
also showing them trying to figure out thier relationship with God and
trying to figure out thier place in the world!!! I am not a Clooney fan
by any shake of the imagination but he does a wonderful job in this. I
also have to say that I do not buy CD's much anymore but the music from
this movie hit me so hard that I ran out the next day and bought the CD
and I have had three people ask me where they can get a copy cause they
heard me playing it at the Church that I am a Intern pastor at. Anywho,
I suggest this movie to one and all it is a wonderful and fun movie with
a very meaningful message, even if the Coen brothers didn't mean for it
to carry such a message! Christ is Risen, Lets live as if this is true
and celebrate our new life in him
Midnight Matthew
|
|
WANTING
FULFILLMENT
Subject:
Blow
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001
From: Erik Nelson
I can relate
to the hunger of wanting fullfillment. I am intrigued by what Jesus said
in John Chap 4, "All who drink of the water I give them will never thirst
again." Jesus was'nt talking about H2o, but that the fullfillment the
world has to offer is just a facad to the food (a relationship with Jesus
Christ) that puts an end to all hunger. What is this food? God has seen
how we hunger and wants to fill us with His love (true fullfillment).
In fact Jesus said "If they would repent and turn from their sin, then
I would heal them." Repentence is the key which opens our heart God, so
that he can give us fullfillment that we may not deserve, but he is so
willing to give. So how do do I unwrap this gift of fullfillment which
God has laid in front of me? I simply say I am sorry for buying into the
fake, and ask Jesus Christ to take the place of emptiness in my life.
"For those who are in Christ are a new creation, the old has gone and
the new has come." If upon reading this you have any questions,
E-mail me at erikosuave78@hotmail.com.
My name is Erik Nelson, I'm 23
|
|
APPRECIATE
THIS ON TELEVISION
Subject: Jesus Mini Series
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001
From: "Amay Dufault"
I
really appreciated the Jesus movie that I saw on TV. I thought that Jesus
was portrayed so well, grieving, dancing, laughing and loving. I liked
the way that Bible truths and teaching is portrayed in a very believable
manner and very close to the written account. I congratulate you for such
a engaging and profound presentation of the life of Jesus Christ and also
the portrayal of human nature in light of our temptations and sinfulness.
May the hope of our risen Lord touch your life this Easter.
Amay
|
|
WHAT
A WASTE
Subject:
WhatDreamsMayCome
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001
From: Matt
I thought
this was a terrible film. Not only is it a silly view of Heaven and Hell
from a Christian point of view, but also a pure piece of fluff form the
view of must other religions. What would a Buddhist make of "optional"
reincarnation? Heaven is a misty theme park, God "up there somewhere",
hell is at least visually interesting but of little consequence. Life
on earth is all about laughing and rolling in the grass...easy enough
for the spoiled yuppies who are the heroes of this film. Visual fireworks
cannot make up for a dumb, dumb, dumb, script that makes "Touched by an
Angel" look like sophisticated theology.
matt
|
|
I
KNOW WHY!
Subject:
Star Wars Episode 1
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001
From: DAN
I KNOW WHY
OBI-WAN AND YODA DISAPPEARED!!!! SINCE LUCAS LIKES TO BORROW THINGS FROM
THE BIBLE (LIKE ANAKINS MIRACULOUS "VIRGIN BIRTH") HE WAS READING ONE
DAY IN HIS FAITHFUL OLD KJV AND COME ACROSS TWO ACCOUNTS OF MEN WHO WERE
SO IN TUNE WITH THE LORD THAT GOD JUST TOOK THEM. IM REFERRING TO ENOCH
AND ELIJAH WHO WERE TRANSLATED/RAPTURED INTO GLORY.YODA AND OBI-WAN WERE
AT SUCH A MATURE LEVEL AND IN SUCH HARMONY WITH THE FORCE THAT "IT" JUST
TOOK THEM. REMEMBER, ELIJAH LEFT ELISHA (AS A MATTER OF FACT THE SPIRIT
OF ELIJAH RESTED ON ELISHA IN II KINGS 2:15 AS THE SPIRIT OF OBI-WAN DID
ON LUKE IN EPISODE IV), OBI-WAN LEFT LUKE. THE ONLY SPECULATION I HAVE
ABOUT ENOCH AND STAR WARS IS THAT ENOCH WAS TAKEN JUST PRIOR TO THE FLOOD
(GEN 5) AND PROPHESIED OF THE COMING OF CHRIST TO EXECUTE JUDGEMENT (JUDE
14&15). PERHAPS THERES SOME CONNECTION BETWEEN THE APOCALYPSE, YODA, AND
THE DESTRUCTION OF THE EMPIRE.
DANHURST31@AOL.COM.
|
|
COMMENTS
ON POE
Subject:
comment on POE Prince_of_Egypt
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001
From: Candace
I think that
POE ranks higher than The Ten Commendments in achievement and accuracy.
First of all, i just love movies that animate historic events. Through
the use of musical numbers and occasional accounts of humor, POE eases
up the complex biblical plot for kids. Second of all, POE is more accurate
concerning the biblical event it describes than is The Ten Commendments.
POE allows the viewer to see both sides of the story--the Egyptian and
the Hebrew. I used to think that the Hebrews were a solely righeteous
people being enslaved a pharaoh that was nothing but flawed. Watching
POE changed my viewpoint quite a bit. From what I saw, both the pharaoh
and Moses were justified in their actions. The pharaoh Rameses was struggling
with leadership at the time. He was nicknamed by his father the "weak
link of a mighty dynasty [one that had ruled Egypt and led the world for
2000 years]." Also, Rameses was being tormented by the fact that the only
friend he had known, Moses, had become his only enemy. Furthermore, both
Rameses and Moses thought that keeping the Hebrews as slaves was the just
thing to do before Moses discovered that he was originally the son of
a Hebrew. Only by discovering this fact did he begin showing some sort
of sympathy towards the Hebrews. (By the way, cross-examination cannot
argue that Moses was still a child at this time and was thus learning
values and responsibilities in his life, because Moses was anywhere from
25 to 30 at the point of this epiphany.) Thus, similarly, Rameses was
doing a just thing of keeping the Hebrews as slaves from this perspective.
He desired to maintain the empire's glory and had not been through a likewise
revelation. Moreover, Rameses was justified in his dealings with God,
because he was not like a tyrannical king who had deified himself such
as Julius Caesar, but he was rather a devout Egyptian who was following
the scriptures of his Egyptian Gods. He should not thus be blamed for
doubting the God of Abraham. (by the way, i believe that there is only
one God but he can be worshipped in many ways as long as one believes
in him. Drawing from this perspective, both the God of Abraham of Moses
and the Egyptian Gods were ultimately the same.) On the other hand, Moses
was justified in his actions because he was trying to free slaves from
bondage. Neither Rameses nor Moses should be portrayed as more righteous
in his actions than the other. The Ten Commandments in many ways favors
Moses over Rameses by portraying Rameses as an arrogant, furious, tyrannical
pharaoh and Moses as an innocent, modest, and a favorite son of the pharaoh.
POE is much more accurate and should be credited for its advancement of
feature animation.
|
|
PARDON
OR PUNISHMENT?
Subject:The
Widow of St Pierre
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001
From: Kim
As with Dead
Man Walking, this movie raises yet again the important social/political
issue of capitol punishment. As a Christian, I believe absolutely that
people can change - that they can take responsibility for their lives,
have a true change of heart, and become a new person. However, does a
complete change of heart and mind warrant a pardon? Or must the law be
satisfied when death is the law? That is the angst of Dead Man Walking,
and that is the angst of The Widow of Saint Pierre.
The difference
between this movie and Dead Man Walking is that God plays no obvious role
in Neel's change. However, Madame La is most definately a Christ figure
in that she extends grace and trust to Neel, and sees potential in him
that he does not. This transforms him, and transforms the hearts of an
entire community. The community of Saint Pierre follows her lead, and
decides to give him another chance. They aren't dissipointed. In this
way, God is most definately part of the change because love is who He
is. As to whether Madame La had a relationship God, we aren't told.
That this
story is based on true events is encouraging. Love, acceptance and grace
really do change lives. I don't know whether Madame La was a shining portrait
of discretion, but she certainly was a shining portrait of grace.
~Kim
|
|
CHRISTIAN
ARTIST VIEW ON LEFT BEHIND?
Subject:
Left_Behind
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001
From: Melissa
Hey (especially
Christian Artists), I've read most of the LB books and seen the movie.
Right now I am writing a research paper on the Christian Artists' function,
using Left Behind and the debates surrounding it as the center of my paper.
I've noticed a lot of people on this BB saying that LB the movie is disappointing
and rather than argue theologically, I want to question the artistic value
of LB and what role it had for the Christian artist. Is LB too "preachy?"
SHould all Christian Art be this way? What is the best way for a Christian
to reach a secular audience? Was LB really good or do we just have this
need to say it's good because we are Christians and we want to help our
fellow brothers and sisters (the producers of the film) and also feel
a need to evangelize? IS LB a powerful evangelizing tool? Does LB do more
harm than it does help to the non-Christian? These are a few questions
I am asking in my paper. I'd really appreciate responses directly to my
e-mail by Christian artists-ie filmmakers, writers, painters, sculpters,
musicians, etc (sorry if I left your art out). As a filmmaker and a Christian
a year from graduating film school, this topic is of utmost importance
to me and my verdict on what value the books and film have is still out.
Thanks for all your help.
David, feel free to give out my e-mail!
In Christ, Melissa melissmm@usc.edu
|
|
JESUS
COMMENT
Subject:
JesusMiniSeries
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001
From: MARK
This was
one of the worst portrayals of Jesus I ever saw. I would not want to follow
a Jesus who had to be pushed into his ministry by Mary. Half the time,
he didn't even seem like he knew what he was supposed to do. He let the
people direct what he was supposed to do, I don't think this is what God
would have directed his son to do. When he was choosing his apostles,
it was laughable. It was more like someone choosing a baseball team in
grade school, as the apostles would shout "choose me!, choose me!" I saw
one comment where someone said this is the Jesus for all, well its not
the Jesus of the bible, it is some Hollywood concoction of a completely
watered down Jesus that has no substance nor power. If you want to see
a true masterpiece about the live of Christ that follows more or less
according to scripture with only a little deviation, see Franco Zefferellli's
Jesus of Nazareth. That is the best miniseries I have seen. This Jesus
by CBS is a joke.
Mark email: mark24609@aol.com
|
|
1981
OR 1982?
Subject:
French_Lieutenants_Woman
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001
From: Mike
I thought
the film won an academy award in 1981, though you list it as 1982
Mike H
Response:
I could not find where I any mention of 1981 or 1982. What am I not seeing?
-David
|
|
NC-17
OR NOT?
Subject:
Ratings policy?
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001
From: Mark
Hi David,
I enjoy your website very much. One of my friends was moved by "Requiem
For A Dream." I haven't seen it, but thought I'd check your website thoughts
on it. I couldn't find it on your site, though, and I was wondering if
you had a policy against featuring NC-17 films.
Thanks for the great work, Mark
Response:
I have no ban on NC-17 reviews. I just have not seen the film. -David
|
|
FINAL
SCENE
Subject:
The final scene as metaphor for the whole movie
Traffic
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001
From: Mark
"Traffic"
ends with a little league baseball game. Each batter gets on base after
one pitch -- the pitching and fielding are mediocre at best. As the scene
ends, the bases are loaded and the pitcher is trying to intimidate the
runners back to base instead of allowing the steal. We never see the next
batter swing, but he's coming to the plate and it looks like he might
just knock in a run or two. Likewise, the dealers, users and cartels are
"outplaying" the government and parents. However, the government and parents
don't give up. They just keep "pitching and fielding," intimidating and
waving back the drug forces the best they can. The film's open ending
and the scene's open ending both leave us wondering "How long until this
game is over? It could be a long night. Will the offense bring in some
of those runners on base out ther? Will the defense stop them any time
soon? Even if they're stopped this inning, what will happen next inning?"
This could sound trite, but my theory is: there are very few scenes left
to chance in a Hollywood film. This is a fully intentional metaphor.
|
|
AGREES
WITH MATT
Subject:
I have to agree with MATT Hannibal
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001
From: "Dan Laskowski"
David I have
to agree with Matt! I must admit that I didn't see "HANNIBAL" but I have
a very hard time comparing a cannibal with Jesus Christ ! All of the other
PARRALLELS that you drew with the "Christ story" (new testament) put chills
down my spine.
Dan Laskowski
http://jesuspop.com
Response:
You have comment on a film you have not seen? Well, whatever. Like it
or not the parrallels are there. -David
|
|
WHY
DID YOU REVIEW THIS FILM
Subject:
The Mexican
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001
From: Judy in Va.
I cannot
believe your review of this movie. I almost walked out of the theater!
The only thing good about this movie was the popcorn I was eating! I don't
think Jesus would approve of the language and the sexual content in this
movie. I am a christain lady and I love a good movie, but this was not
one that I would recommend to any of my friends. I am shocked at you comments!
God help you!
Judy in Va.
Response:
Reviews are reviews, not recommendations. May God help me, you say? Wow!
Well, thank you ...I think. -David
|
|
REJOICE!
Subject:
Chocolat
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001
From: Caldwell Alexander A A1C
People, people,
this parable is not perfect, there are distinct flaws, but let us rejoice
in truth where it is found! The writer/director is not a fundamentalist
pastor sermonizing, if he was then I would have distinct problems with
his message, but this film is coming from a secular viewpoint and captures
ideas of grace and legalism quite profoundly. Paul saw truth in Athens
and he used it as a springboard for initiating conversation on Mars Hill.
Let us follow his example and not throw up so many walls when a movie
is not perfectly in line with scripture, let's consider the source and
be mindful that truth springs often from pagan lips.
A1C Alexander Caldwell
Flight Medicine ex. 4705 4 Fox
|
|
PREACH
IT BROTHER
Subject:
Chocolat
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001
From: Kim
Caldwell
Alexander - preach it brother!!!
I agree
wholeheartedly.
Kim
|
|
GODZILLA
VS LEVIATHAN
Subject:
Original_Godzilla
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001
From: john
Dear Sirs
It has been a while since I saw the movie, but if my memory is correct
Godzilla breathed fire had a nearly impervious skin and when he came out
of the water made the "boil" These all describe the Biblical creature
Leviathan as described in Job chapter 41. For the above three descriptions
see verses 18-21 (fire) 15-17, 23 (hardy skin) and v31 boiling water.
Many scientists claim that T Rex's tail was used for balance, but the
movie got me to thinking that T rex may have also lived partly in water,
using his tail to push throught the water as a crocodile uses his tail
to push himself through water, and using the small arms to steer him.
Although Godzilla is a fictitious creature, created in the 1950s, the
scientists really don't know any more about a T rex's life than the rest
of us do.
John
|
|
ABOUT
PERCY
Subject:
Green_Mile
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001
From: Leah
i dont really
understand what JC did to Percy at the end. Did JC show him what "wild
bill" had done to those two girls? Is that why Percy shot him? If you
could please send me something about this i would greatly appreciate it.
Leah
Response:
It is not real clear in the film. -David
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 67
|
Index
to all the comments from Oct. 01, 2000 to May 03, 2001
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 72 May 01-03, 2001
Go to page 71 Apr 26-30, 2001
Go to page 70 Apr 24-25, 2001
Go to page 69 Apr 21-23, 2001
Go to page 68 Apr 16-20, 2001
Go to page 67 Apr 01-15, 2001
Go to page 66 Mar 24-31, 2001
Go to page 65 Mar 16-23, 2001
Go to page 64 Mar 12-15, 2001
Go to page 63 Mar 05-11, 2001
Go to page 62 Mar
01-03, 2001
Go to page 61 Feb 25-28, 2001
Go to page 60 Feb 18-24, 2001
Go to page 59 Feb 11-17, 2001
Go to page 58 Feb 07-10, 2001
Go to page 57 Feb 03-06, 2001
Go to page 56 Feb 01-02, 2001
Go to page 55 Jan 24-31, 2001
|
Go
to page 54 Jan 20-23, 2001
Go to page 53 Jan 15-19, 2001
Go to page 52 Jan 06-14, 2001
Go to page 51 Jan
01-05, 2001
Go to page 50 Dec 22-31, 2000
Go to page 49 Dec 16-21, 2000
Go to page 48 Dec 14-15, 2000
Go to page 47 Dec 08-13, 2000
Go to page 46 Dec 03-07, 2000
Go to page 45 Dec 01-02, 2000
Go to page 44 Nov 24-30, 2000
Go to page 43 Nov 12-23, 2000
Go to page 42 Nov 06-11, 2000
Go to page 41 Nov 01-05, 2000
Go to page 40 Oct 23-30, 2000
Go to page 39 Oct 11-22, 2000
Go to page 38 Oct 08-10, 2000
Go to page 37 Oct
01-07, 2000
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|