|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on March 24, 2002
|
|
SOME
GUY, PART 3
Subject: Mithras
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
From: Some Guy
Yes, hard as it may
be to believe, your enjoyment of sunsets, food, life, etc. are all the
result of a cosmic "accident" that took billions of years to
unfold. (BTW, just to clarify, are you one of those who believes the earth
is only 6,000 -or-so years old? Some believers do, some don't. I just
wanted to know.) You are right the earth is ancient.
However, It does have a designer. Your designer god seems to be Chance!
Your faith rests in Fate or Chance. So, you do believe in God -David.
Christians like to put that up as an argument, as well as "If there
is no God, why don't we all just run around and kill each other, fornicate,
create every kind of chaos? There is no morality without God." Absurd.
Civilized society, for the most part, has learned that certain types of
behavior are necessary for humanity to function. The Bible doesn't corner
the market or even have any claims to originality when it comes to moral
principles. Codes of behavior were large parts of nations even more primitive
than Biblical Israel. Egypt, China, South America, etc. all had these
same laws on the books centuries, sometimes millennia before the Old Testament.
This is true. As the Celtic Christians believe the
image or impression of God is in everyone, not just Christians. Romans
chapter 1 teaches that the law of God is written on every heart. So I
agree with you for the most part -David. Anyway, the sun would've
shone, the tress would've grown, mankind (Humanity,
you mean, you tend to use andocentric language that exludes woman -David)
would've thrived without a belief in God. Vastly different? Sure.
But the survival instinct would've carried the day. Ahh,
that in born desire to survive, to live, to grow -all a part of the God
image -David
According to the interpreters
of scripture, yes, Jesus was 100% human, but was also 100% divine, without
sin or defect, perfect. He would've been free from the emotional failures
he displays quite often. Was he loving his enemies when he stormed the
Temple and threw out the money changers? Yes, tough
love -David And, if he were co-equal with God, he would've had
a vast supply of knowledge of every nation on earth and of the infinite
future, none of which he displays anywhere in the NT No he did not have
knowledge that was different than any other human. To
believe that Jesus used retained in any way his divinity in the incarntion
has always been considered heresy in the church. In the incarnation Jesus
became human. Period.
I agree with you that,
in the context of the Christian myth, Jesus as anything other than human
would've made the resurrection meaningless. There is just no evidence
at all that he was God, other than him saying so. You can go on all day
about the miracles he supposedly performed, but other contemporaries of
Jesus were "healers" as well. Phillip for example. And isn't
it curious that not one single person who he allegedly healed came to
his defense at his trial? Are you suggesting that Jesus
had a fair trial? Also, you seem to bend Jesus to your understanding in
order to dismiss him. Your logic is interesting. -David
I urge everyone who
happens upon this site to read the marvelous books GOD: A BIOGRAPHY and
CHRIST: CRISIS IN THE LIFE OF GOD by Jack Miles. He is an absolute genius
at breaking through the mysticism and finding reality. Then go out and
find any book with the writings of Robert Ingress. He can be a little
repetitive at times, but he was one of the ultimate free thinkers in history.
Do they also bend Jesus to in order to dismiss him?
-David
|
WALK
TO REMEMBER
Subject: walk to remember
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
From: "Jeremy Lewis"
I thought you guys were going to review this movie and post it on the 25,
well i would love to read what you guys have found, but i just cant find
it
a walk to remember?
help me out if you
can
Jeremy Lewis
Youth Minister- Plymouth Park C of C
Response
-Sorry for the delay. -David
|
HATED
THIS MOVIE
Subject: Black_Hawk_Down
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
From: Marla
I absolutely
hated this movie. I am not that fond of war movies, but when a teen friend
wanted to see it, I agreed to go, hoping for some redeeming quality like
an explanation of what the conflict was about. Instead, I found myself
unhappily immersed in a live video game, complete with shootings and gore,
non-stop. The only "lesson" was to not abandon your fellow soldiers, and
that war is about taking care of your fellow soldier. When are we going
to decide that war means taking care of my fellow soldier by not running
to war solutions? And that we need to be soldiers in a different kind
of war, wrestling with the giants of poverty or alcoholism in your or
my city? Christians who are afraid to go work or live in their inner city
will go and cheer these guys for killing a bunch of people in their own
city in Somalia, going about their own business, fighting to protect their
territory. But face the dangers of gangs or drugs? And those are really
the brothers we can't abandon, the people next to us that we really should
be saving and seeing!
The move also
failed to deal with the big question of whether the US or the UN is doing
any good by sending in soldiers to other country situations like these.
I left about as ignorant about Somalia and the lives that needed saving
and still do, as I am now. I think, I think, they tried to say the dictator
there was a Hitler and thus the people (Nazis?) around him deserved to
die, too?
I can't think of anything
to recommend this movie.
Marla
Response:
I can understand your discomfort. This was however, based on a true story.
It was not a commentary on the ethics of the war itself. It was what it
was. -David
|
|
GO
SEE IT
Subject: Amalie
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
From: GGH
Everyone everywhere
should hurry-up and see this movie. It is a gem. Even if you hate subtitle
(like myself) It is a must see. Treat yourself and maybe you will be a
treat to others as a result.
|
|
THOUGHT
ON HARRY POTTER
Subject: Harry Potter AND Newsletter_30_Harry_Potter
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002
From: "Wendy"
Hi David,
It has been interesting,
and sometimes sad, this debate over Harry Potter, between Christians.
Untill recently I
have been stting on the fence regarding the Harry Potter issue, meaning
that I was neither for or against it. In fact I really had no interest
in Harry Potter at all, not because of any issue with the occult. I just
wasn't that interested.
However as arguements
and opinions became more heated, I decided instead of getting too involve,
I would seek wisdom and discerment from God.
I thought God knows
my heart. He knows that I am aware of the truth, that Jesus Christ in
Lord and Saviour. He knows that if I read Harry Potter, I'm not going
to turn my back on him, and become a witch.
It is interesting
that some Christians believe it's a sin to read Harry Potter, where as
others do not.
So I think the question
to ask is 'What is a sin? The Bible says it is something that seperates
us from God.
How do we become seperated
from God? By becoming obssess with something, and spending more time with
that, then with God.
In other words, if
you have become obsessed with Harry Potter to the point where it has taken
over your life, than yes, for you reading Harry Potter maybe a sin (because
it has seperated you from God).
If however, you just
occasionally read the books, but have no obsession with them, in that
you have more of desire to know God, then to get your hand on the next
Harry Potter book, then enjoy reading them, knowing that you know God's
truth.
Now I know that some
Christians, have said we shouldn't read the books at all, because it may
lead to the occult.
But let me ask these
questions. Do you go to McDonalds? Do you have a glass of wine with your
dinner?
If your answer is
yes to those questions, then I could say to you, 'Well going to McDonlads
could lead to gluttony, or drinking wine may lead you into an alcohol
problem.'
My point is that everyone
is different, in that if some people to have a weight or drinking problem,
that going to McDonalds or have wine with dinner, may not be a good idea.
The same if someone
in the past has had bad experiences with things like the occult, then
maybe something like Harry Potter isn't good for you.
And as for your children,
well that is for the parents to discern and anyone outsiders opinions
should be kept to themselves, since most parents know their own children,
and what is best or isn't best for them.
I think when it all
comes down to it, let's stop debating over the Harry Potter issue, and
just accept that some like Harry and some don't.
Stop giving satan
a foothold into this, because I tell you, he is really enjoying using
Harry Potter to break Christian relationships.
And lastly, I really
respect amd admire those who have been able to bring others to the Christian
faith, by using Harry Potter as analogy. I bet satan wasn't expecting
that.
God Bless, Wendy
|
|
DID
WE SEE THE SAME FILM?
Subject: Moulin_Rouge
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 03:33:45 -0800
From: "Dan Saperstein"
While I appreciate
the depth of thought that went into the review of Moulin Rouge, I am afraid
the author goes a bit overboard in his deconstruction of the film. Contrary
to his overblown analysis (the Egyptian goddess Sati!) the spiritual content
of the film is just simplistic and adolescent: the redemptive power of
romantic love (often confused with sensuality and eroticism) contrasted
with oppressive religious moralism. The story is overworn and the plot
is threadbare and utterly predictable. No doubt, the film scores a "10"
for art direction and cinematography, but the writing is so cliche that
I thought the only way to enjoy the film was to accept it as "camp," i.e.,
an intentional spoof of the genre, right down to the choice of music ("Silly
Love Songs"? "Like a Virgin"?). Alas, all I have seen about the director's
intentions do not support this theory. The result is "burlesque" on film:
a lot of eye candy but ultimately a waste of time and talent.
The Rev. Dan Saperstein Pullman, WA
Response:
This film is not a waste of time and talent. It is brilliant and the members
of the Academy agree. It is Sati, the use of the elephant underscores
that, please brush up on your mythology. Also, get a good book on Celtic
spirituality to understand romantic love as created by God, therefore
it reflects God's love and passion for us. -David
|
|
JUST
SOME GUY, part 2
Subject: Mithras
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002
From: Just some guy
David--
Ha, that's rich! A Christian talking about logic. (Thanks
for the slam -David) No, I don't think Jesus was a stupid peasant.
He was at times very wise, other times self-contradicting and filled with
normal emotion. In other words, HUMAN. (Jesus was 100%
human -absolutely true. To be less than human would reindered Jesus meaningless
-David) If he were God, and illiterate, then God is illiterate????
(No. If Jesus was human, and he was, does that make
God a human? -David) . Obviously he had no knowledge or care for
the long-term future of humanity. (As a human, you
are right, he was just like you and I -100% human -which is the point.
-David) One of his unfulfilled prophecies mentions that (paraphrasing)
"There are some among you who shall not draw their last breath before
the return of God's Kingdom." ( The Kingdom came on
the Day of Pentecost just after the resurrection -David) This is
why his followers, especially Paul, were in such a hurry to get right
with God (Not true. -David). They expected Jesus
to come back in their lifetimes, (True. -David)
and apparently, Jesus thought so too (Not true. -David).
Jesus is worthy of consideration only in the context of his effect on
humanity. He is Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, and every
other story we tell ourselves to fell better. He is not the son of God,
there IS no God, (There is no God? How is it that I
enjoy sunsets, delicious food, and human passion? Is all this sense, desire,
passion and lust for life a cosmic accident?) and the sooner society
realizes this, the sooner we can focus our attention on things that really
matter (family, friends, art, literature, education, progress) and not
on myths meant to assuage our fears of death and the unknown. (Myth
is the best vehicle of truth -David).
Oh, BTW, you wonder
who would've listened if Jesus would've told everyone the earth was a
sphere and not flat. Well, if they believed him when he said he was the
son of the CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE, why wouldn't they believe ANYTHING
he said? (Why is important to you that Jesus needs
to be a 21st century realist? Jesus came in another time and culture.
He did not need to conform to your proof list in order to be Lord).
And Jesus did say
to love your enemies, but that wasn't very specific, was it? (I
think you are right. It was a general statement to cover all situations.
Are Christians your enemies? Can you love Christians? Can you love your
enemies or do you hate? And if you love your enemies, why do you jump
on Jesus' words? Or do you discount Jesus so you can hate? -David)
If someone had told the Knights Templar or the Grand Inquisitor to love
their enemies because Jesus said so, do you think they would've stopped
the years of torture and murder in Jesus' name? (No
I don't think those misguided evil people would have. I agree with you
on this point. These were terrible people. I am sure they are burning
in Hell for their unrepented crimes against humanity in God's name. Paradoxically,
God loves all people, even them. Even you . -David)
|
|
POLLOCK
REVIEW
Subject: Pollock
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002
From: Jessica
I enjoyed your review
about Pollock, but I must say the research about Reuben kadish for this
movei was pathetically deplorable. I know the movie featured Pollock,
but some accuracy is portraying Reuben would have been good. As a very
good friend of Reuben's son, it was quite shocking to see the poetic license
taken by Hollywood on this one.
Jessica
|
|
FILM
CLIPS
Subject: film clips
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002
From: Laura
Is there a place on
this website where I could find a list of film clips that would reinforce
certain Biblical truths. We like to show film clips sometimes in our worship
services for adult and youth and we could really use an index that could
help guide us to the right clip for different spiritual topics
Response:
I will do it. Thanks. -David
|
|
AUSTRALIAN
FILMMAKER LOVES THIS SITE
Subject: Comments
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002
From: Jason Wilson
I am an Australian
who absolutley loves visiting this site. I am aspiring to create films
that reach out and touch an individuals heart instead of bombarding them
wit blatently obvious spiritual conundrums. I believe that people are
more readily subjected to spiritual context when they are in the comfort
of a dark cinema where no ones watching them. So therefor why not leave
them with a message that would make them ponder for days after? Something
that would give some joy, peace, love and uplifting. Something that reaches
their hearts and not their minds. I believe it can be done.
We have so long limited
God to four walls and a ceiling on a Sunday. We have limited Gods ability
to use anything he wants to His greater glory. He is using the secular
world right now. Musicians who arent ashamed to sing about Christs love.
Directors who arent afraid to show Christs love on film. TV producers
who arent afraid to make spirit filled tv programmes. Photographers who
bring out the joy and grace of the Lord. Hes already out there. Why don't
we just grab on...where are all the writers who have said "oh i have a
fantastic idea for a movie that touches on Gods love"? If you dream the
dream....God prepares the way....we can do this....we can flood the market
with spiritualy filled films that gently reach the world instead of bombarding
the world with war, horror, murder, crisis ect...
Have you ever thought
of having a section where Christian Film makers can share ideas, rescourses
ect? I know i would be apart of it!
Blessings to all who
work at Hollywood Jesus. Keep up the amazing work.
Jason Wilson
Response:
I will do it. Thanks. -David
|
|
AMERICAN
PIE ALMOST GETS LUCKY
Subject: American Pie
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002
From: "David"
American Pie almost
managed to "score" by communicating a powerful message in a relevant way
to an anxious generation.
They took the clever
strategy adapted by several contemporary prophetic movies and began by
hooking the audience with jokes regarding the subject matter intended
to be discussed (and, hopefully, reconsidered). Beginning by letting the
audience laugh at an adolescent masturbating into a tube sock, their attention
is grabbed by a series of jokes poking fun at the fact of teenage sexuality
and activity. To an audience living in a pubescently sexual world, these
jokes hit home more than any other subject matter, perhaps. And as such,
they have the powerful potential to be turned on their heads later on
in the movie--which is what American Pie almost manages to do. One of
the characters gives a poignant speech to his companions at Prom (I've
forgotten his name) which embodies an alternative view to all the rushed
and animal sexuality portrayed in the movie. He suggests that there seems
to be little logicality in killing oneself in striving towards something
that may eventually end up being, existentially, rather hollow.
Were the film left
at that, the impact would have been deep and lasting. By catching your
audience's attention with jokes about the very evil or ignorance you are
going to question, they eventually can come to see themselves in the characters
as they descend into culturally sanctioned but meaningless behaviour.
This technique was used to some extent in "Breakfast Club", a film which
began by playing to the audience's sense of humor regarding unacceptable
people and cliques within the high school social strata, and then turned
this on its head as the audience joined the characters in a transformation
of their relationships, eventually destroying the barriers and divisions
that had separated them.
American Pie majorly
wusses out, however, after the moral climax of the film. Rather than leave
the message inscribed on the audience's hearts (namely, the question "is
there maybe a better context for sexuality than the hormone-raging promiscuity
of the high school world?"), the film wimps out and chooses to continue
playing to its audiences pre-film tastes and mindsets. After doing its
"moral duty" for the philosophers in the crowd, it returns to satisfy
the audience with a sexual adventure for each character now that they
are, supposedly, no longer obligated to rush into sex. In doing so, the
movie becomes like the snivelling kid on the playground who just can't
bring himself to say "no" to the bullies, sheepishly returning to hand
over his lunch money each day.
The audience leaves,
their underdeveloped conscience satisfied that they have been told not
to get pressured into sex. And all their sexual mores and obligations
remain intact; they continue to numbly accept sexual promiscuity as a
sometimes humorous, sometimes beautiful, but always necessary aspect of
high school life. Way to stand your ground, American Pie. (You have to
love the pep-talks given by the Dad-character, though.)
-David
spooookyghost@hotmail.com
|
|
IS
IS PG?
Subject: 40_Days_and_40_Nights
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002
From: Kcov
is this a movie with
josh hartnett and it is rated pg right?
|
|
A
WALK TO REMEMBER
Subject: A Walk to Remember
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002
From: "Cathy Anderson"
Associated Baptist
press just released an article about the marketing of this movie to Christian
Audiences. I'd like you take on the movie and the marketing.
Thanks,
Cathy Anderson
|
|
A
MAN FOR ALL SEASONS
Subject: Spiritual Impact of a movie
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002
From: Blake
Greetings,
Without a doubt the biggest spiritual impact of any movie I have ever
seen is "A Man For All Seasons" about the life of St. Thomas More....winner
of several academy awards including best picture (1966?), and now hard
to find at any video store.
Blake
|
|
GREAT
MOVIE
Subject: Left_Behind
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002
From: Mary
The movie was great
i loved it i hope you make more.
--- Mary Cundiff in Selverdal Wa
|
|
WHO
SINGS THE SONG?
Subject: blair witch 2
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002
From: andrew
who sings the song
when kim is driving the van and swerves to miss the kids, and what is
the song? i heard the song before, but i cant remember who it is.
|
|
I
LIKED IT!
Subject: Myth_Is_Good_Newsletter_31
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002
From: Darren
Organization: Lakeview Free Methodist Church
I think that Christianity
HAS to be shown through myth. We humans have no idea of the immensity
of God; how much bigger and "other" he is. I am thankful for Lewis, Tolkien,
and so many others that have led the way. My own spirituality would have
died without people like them.
Response:
Amen! I totally agree! -David
|
|
JEREMY
-FEEL VERY KINDRED
Subject: Powder
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002
From: Jim Karmann
Jeremy
Hi my name is Jeremy. I felt very kindred to the problems and dilemmas
faced by the other Jeremy in the movie Powder. What I see reflected in
this movie is the acceptance of the future Christ in his evolutionary
form. In the Age of the Son Jesus had discovered how to use the power
of the creator to manifest psychical powers. Since the ascension of the
Christ on the cross that whole psychic energy moved out of the body of
the ascended Christ and into the earth itself in the Age of the Holy Spirit.
I believe that this movie reflects the appearance of the New Age Christ
as a matter of evolution rather than incarnation. We are to accept the
Age of the Holy Spirit in the form of the collective Messiah not as a
manifestation of all that is not human but all that embodies the best
qualities of humanity itself. I also think we should understand Powders
situation as a higher evolutionary intelligence who only wanted to be
alone in his basement reading books and creating architectural models
of higher dimensional forms. I realized that Jeremy had a world of architectural
creations which shows his powers of creativity in the structure he built
from the forks and spoons in the cafeteria. I myself have this connection
to the heavenly dimensions. I build models and draw blueprints of creational
architectures from higher dimensions. I relate to Powders desire to be
alone in his basement buisy with design. But I do think that the Messiah
of our age is not about incarnation as it was in the age of Jesus but
instead is about the evolution of human intelligence and the evolution
of the human creative condition. I see sept. 11th as the final transition
of the Christ consciousness from an historical human condition to the
condition establishing the New Age. It was about the past, about terrorists
who want their Christ to be an image of the historic Christ and not accepting
the evolution of human intelligence in the Age of the Holy Spirit.
Thank You
|
|
BEING
THERE
Subject: being there
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002
From: Julie
a while back i saw
this movie called Being There. It stars Peter Sellers and was made in
1979. at the end Peter Sellers walks out onto this pond and sticks his
umbrella down. as if he were walking on water. i was wondering, what is
your take on this, what do you think the director is trying to say? thank-
you for taking the time to read my letter and i hope you can find and
answer.
Julie
Response:
He was thinking about Jesus. -David
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 142
|
Index
to all the comments Sep 13, 2001 to Mar 06, 2002
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 145 Mar
01-06, 2002
Go to page 144 Feb 18-28, 2002
Go to page 143 Feb 01-17, 2002
Go to page 142 Jan 25-31, 2002
Go to page 141 Jan18-24, 2002
Go to page 140 Jan 14-17, 2002
Go to page 139 Jan 13, 2002
Go to page 138 Jan 08-12, 2002
Go to page 137 Jan 06-07, 2002
Go to page 136 Jan 04-05, 2002
Go to page 135 Jan 01-03, 2002
Go to page 134 Dec 27-31, 2002
Go to page 133 Dec 21-26, 2001
Go to page 132 Dec 13-20, 2001
Go to page 131 Dec 06-12, 2001
Go to page 130 Dec
01-05, 2001
Go to page 129 Nov 28-30, 2001
Go to page 128 Nov 27, 2001
|
Go
to page 127 Nov 26, 2001
Go to page 126 Nov 20-25, 2001
Go to page 125 Nov 18-20, 2001
Go to page 124 Nov 15-18, 2001
Go to page 123 Nov 14-15, 2001
Go to page 122 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 121 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 120 Nov 08-12, 2001
Go to page 119 Nov 07, 2001
Go to page 118 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 117 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 116 Nov 1-5, 2001
Go to page 115 Oct 30-31, 2001
Go to page 114 Oct 23-29, 2001
Go to page 113 Oct 12-22, 2001
Go to page 112 Oct
01-11, 2001
Go to page 111 Sep 18-30, 2001
Go to page 110 Sep 13-17, 2001
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|