|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on January 8, 2002
|
|
THE
ENDING OF VANILLA SKY
Subject: Vanilla
Sky
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002
From: Chris Utley
i
totally understood it. many people don't. the whole film was a cross between
Twilight Zone and It's A Wonderful Life. that may be too much for people
to bear and stomach. it would have been nice to see how David Aames lived
his life after his eyes were opened. Chris Utley
|
|
COMMON
MISCONCEPTIONS OF WITCHCRAFT
Subject: Harry_Potter
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002
From: "Alisa Webb"
With all due respect
to this site and those who have posted, I wish to comment on the usage
of the term "witchcraft".
The term "witch",
in modern society, has become somewhat interchangeable with the term "Wiccan".
As someone of that faith, I am saddened by the lack of tolerance some
Christians have of things they do not understand. A true "Witch" is not
evil. They DON'T perform rituals in the name of satan, nor do they try
to influence others to their way of thinking. In old times, witches were
an accepted part of society.
I think many Christians
automatically hated the Harry Potter books and movie because of the references
they had to Witchcraft. They are fully entitled to their opinions. However,
I don't remember this much fuss over the T.V. movie "Merlin", which portrayed
the life of the famous mythical wizard. What is the difference? The difference
is the common MISCONCEPTION about the word "witch".
I understand that
many Christian parents are concerned about what their children read or
watch. But when it comes right down to it, PARENTS, not a book or a movie,
are going to mold a child's values.
Response:
Thanks for your insight! I hope other Wiccans respond. There is a lot
of misconception out there. Please feel free to keep your comments coming.
I appreciate your participation. -David
|
|
THE
MOVIE: WALK TO REMEMBER
Subject: The movie: Walk to remember
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002
From: Robert
I read the book.
The book has a nice spirituality about it. I wonder if the movie is staying
close to the book, preserving the some of the spiritual qualities of the
book. We are thinking about taking our church youth group to see the movie..If
the movie stays true to the book, You might want to discuss this movie
on your site.
Aloha in Christ
Cleo & Robert
|
|
8
AND NOT 7
Subject: blairwitch 2
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002
From: "geckho"
hey..am i the only
one to realise that when Kims crashes Jeffs van when she sees those little
kids that there are 8 children and not 7 which is the amount killed and
the amount that Kim said she had seen to Jeff and reckoned that those
were the kids that runstin parr killed..
|
|
WHAT WAS THAT!!?!
Subject: Vanilla_Sky
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: Angel
the movie made noo
sense and hollywood jesus just restated what i knew... i wish there was
some clarity as to what is real and what isn't real. i think the only
way we'll know is to find one of the writers!!
Response:
Angel, I saw an interview with tom cruise the other day that reiterated
my thoughts in the review. Vanilla sky is about a young man so submersed
in pop culture that he is unable to connect with people (the opening scene
wonderfully suggests this). cruise also said that the character never
takes responsibility, and doesn't realize the ramifications of his decisions
until the incident with gianni--thus cruise is saying that one of the
main themes is taking responsibility. Cruise also said that vanilla sky
is about the small moments and decisions that we deem insignificant that
actually have a huge impact. Maybe you all are looking for something that
isn't there: maybe the film is simpler. -Simon Remark
|
|
THANKS,
AND TO SAK YOUR THOUGHTS ON A MOVIE
Subject: requiem for a dream
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002
From: "Brent
hi david!
id like to thank you for this site, for being everything that www.capalert.com
is not. I just think that if a Christian site makes people NOT want to
be Christians, the whole point is lost. but anyways, im rambling.
i just got done watching
the movie "requiem for a dream" and i was wondering if you had seen it
yet. if you havent, go get it! i thought it was amazing, right up there
with the likes of magnolia and american
beauty. if you have seen it (or if you ever see it) i would really
like to hear your thoughts about it on the webpage.
keep up the GREAT
work!!
brent
Response:
I have seen it. Perhaps I will do a review someday. -David
|
|
THOUGHTS
FROM A BRIT
Subject: Newsletter 30
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: Steve Kennedy.
I am a teacher in
an inner city primary school and wondered if I could contribute something
to the HP debate. In my opinion there is a spiritual dimension to movies
as in life that can be good and uplifting,(Chariots of Fire) or very troubling
and evil (The Exorcist.) As a child Fantasia scared me to death with the
'Night on Bare Mountain' sequence and I had difficulty getting to sleep
for days.
Personal experience
does not always count for much in today's tolerant world, however, I have
known several very damaged children in the inner-city who have exhibited
spiritual behaviour of a foul nature. One boy, the son of spiritist parents
had real problems with 'unseen presences'. So why my concern about Harry
Potter? Isn't that just a fantasy medium for a spiritually searching generation?
Well I know that is possibly where you are coming from, but my concern
is for those whose childhood is so seriously damaged that it takes on
some deeper significance. The bible notes Christ's healing of a demonised
child that was being destroyed. Some things are no different today. Should
we not speak out for the vulnerable, however unpopular in today's culture?
I remember the days
of Dungeons and Dragons and several of my work colleagues getting very
obsessed by it and one becoming an apprentice witch searching for spiritual
reality. I had great opportunities to share about the Lord's power to
redeem. Wonderful for young people, but not always easy for children in
an abusive situation.
Harry Potter's portrayal
of evil as something good, even if done through the fantasy medium of
flying brooms, is my concern, especially when targeted at children. The
first film maybe in the family film tradition, and that doesn't make it
right, but by the fourth book in the series there are quite disturbing
parts which one British paper commented as being unsuitable for Children
(The Independent). And doesn't the devil come as an angel of light? (2
Cor 11v14.) Traditionally, in most works of fiction, witches were not
seen as a force for good. Indeed C.S. Lewis notes that a witch in the
community was considered to be a genuine source of spiritual barrenness
to the women.
Having seen what the
consequences can be for undiscerning people who have come out of a background
of the occult, both young and old, isn't there a place for prevention,
warning and discernment about the realities of witchcraft, no matter how
tastefully and cleverly marketed.
Anyway, I suppose
the final thing to say is that any spiritual interest aroused could be
used to discuss the claims of Christ and the fate of the two magicians,
Simon and Elymus, in the book of Acts. I hope that is a useful contribution
to the debate.
Steve Kennedy.
|
|
GOD
IS JUDGING
Subject: Newsletter 29
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: "David Alfeld-Johnson"
I'm weighing in pretty
late and didn't have time to read all of the other responses, so forgive
me if this is redundant. I do not pretend to know all of the ways that
God was active, present, or involved in the events of September 11. I
would simply make three comments:
1) once again it is
ironic to find the liberal and conservative extremes proclaiming similar
ideas (just slightly different content) with regard to who is "responsible"
for the attacks. While conservative voices suggest God is punishing America
for its participation in their favorite sins, liberals also voiced a sentiment
that "America brought this on itself" because of our policies and attitudes
in the world.
2) You mentioned that
the idea that God would work through someone like Osama Bin Laden was
outrageous. Yet OT prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah often suggested that
Egypt, Assyria, and Babylon were God's instruments without suggesting
that what they did was in any way righteous. God seems willing to act
in all kinds of outrageous ways.
3) Love is sometimes
painful. Loving America may sometimes involve pain. The problem is that
one can't discipline a nation without bringing harm to its individual
citizens. One problem we have understanding terrorism is the way it blurs
the lines between nations and individuals. Attacking a nation can be justified,
attacking individuals is unjustifiable. It feels like Bin Laden and followers
viewed themselves as attacking a nation and a culture, while we experienced
the attack as an attack on innocent civilians. Conversely, our actions
in the world are directed at nations and markets and are easy to justify,
but these same actions are likely taken personally by individuals and
fuel some of the anti-american sentiments around the world.
I mention these random
thoughts in my attempts to understand (not condone, although in the current
climate, understanding is often confused with condoning), these terrible
and destructive events.
Thanks for listening.
David Alfeld-Johnson
|
|
POOR
ROWLING
Subject: Poor Rowling Newsletter_30 Harry_Potter
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: Jeff Harvey
When I first looked
into the whole "Harry Potter" phenomenon, I read the bogus interview that
was supposedly held with it's author. She was made to look as a sapient
trickster whose sole objective was to deceptively draw in the youth of
America to her dark world of witchcraft and sorcery. Fortunately, I found
out that this article was as fictitious as the Harry Potter books themselves.
Personally, this type of blatant sophistry has done more damage to our
reputations as Christians than attempting to do accurate research.
The articles that
I read from reliable sources that actually did interview Rowling portrayed
a much more accurate portrait of a woman who had thought of and then scripted
a story that she would have enjoyed hearing for herself. Simple as that.
It's a fun story: simple, fulfilling all children's (as well as adults')
desire to be special and to be seen for their own uniqueness.
She had no agenda
when writing this story (aside from selling it), but we were quick to
make one up for her. She is now the one having to endure these attacks
on her character. I, however, am glad that she's now able to live without
welfare and has had a new start to her life.
My father is a pastor
and was chastised by other Christians for letting me read the stories
of JRR Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. If it weren't for such stories, however,
I would have never learned to love reading novels. They had spiritual
overtones and magic, yet they did not cause those who read them to join
Wicca or leave their faith.
Look at what the world
has thrown at us before: Dungeons and Dragons, Star Wars, countless music
videos, all with a much stronger and more harmful message of witchcraft,
magic and dangerous philosophical viewpoints. Harry Potter is innocent
in comparison with much of what we have seen before.
I would encourage
those looking into the whole Harry Potter issue to simply do that, look
into it. Research it for yourselves and don't buy into the hysteria of
the moment.
|
|
PARADOX
Subject: Newsletter 21
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: "Moo-ree"
David,
I have to wonder if religious people are targets of suspicion for the
very reason they are respected: conviction. One's convictions, based on
beliefs about God, man, sin, redemption are core to how we live. Even
if one is NOT religious, he or she has beliefs about these core issues,
even if they are counter to Biblical thought. Religious convictions set
up this paradox in that faith based on evidence- note EVIDENCE and NOT
proof-which for many seems fuzzy and ethereal as opposed to being concrete
and measurable. If I live my life by the conviction that I am a sinner
in need of grace, then I will more than likely conduct myself with humility
and tell others of that grace that saves and restores me. My neighbor,
who may possess the opposite conviction ("I don't' need God I'm my own
person. I don't even think He exists"!)sees me as strange and foreign.
I become a target of suspicion because my motives are "too good to be
true" or completely incredible. Bridging the gap takes time, sincerity,
genuineness in relationship and prayer.
In The
Pledge, Jerry didn't have TIME to see if the fruit of the pastor's
life was good and real. He had a murderer to apprehend before someone
else was killed. Even as a Biblical Christian, I've become increasingly
suspect of much of evangelical Christianity for the reasons I mentioned
above. There is precious little honesty and authenticity among those who
claim to be believers. The fruit is all too frequently bad or lacking
and we won't admit to our brothers and sisters that we are in desperate
need of God's grace even though we are already saved. Sean Penn's suspicion
is a product of who we are a society and of our personal tendency to distance
ourselves from a sovereign Creator who so dearly loves us. As I get older,
I realize all the more that the good we do is by His grace and not of
ourselves. We need to extend that grace to others as we see failings and
weakness, believer and unbeliever alike. That conviction may get us into
worldly trouble (by not being suspicious enough or looking naïve) but
that's where faith comes in. Just some ideas,
Marie from Ohio
Response:
Thanks -David
|
|
GREAT
MOVIE
Subject: AI Artifical Intelligence
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: "Mat Carpenter"
Truly wonderful, if
a little strange. Okay, very strange! Also, note how, at the end, the
aliens mention that their human clones only live for one day. Could it
be because the clone has no soul?
|
|
CAN
THERE BE ANY DOUBT?
Subject: Change_Is_Good_for_Churches-News31
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: "Willms"
Is change good for
the church?
Can there be any doubt? Change is good. Very good. Not change for change's
sake, of course. But change that represents a natural, organic evolution
to something better. Christianity is a movement of progress. Christianity
is so vibrant because of its astonishing ability to adapt over time and
across cultures. Change is a visible sign of God continuing to be at work
in the world. But change is also threatening -- at least to humans. The
history of my Anabaptists ancestors contains thousands of martyrs executed
as heretics by those for whom change was not good. But not to worry. The
church will change regardless of whether we want it to or not. Through
a process of natural selection God will continue to work through those
willing to do His will.
|
|
PHEW,
AT LAST...
Subject: harry_potter
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: Helen
It's nice to see
that there are some Christians out there in cyberspace who don't want
to make me feel guilty for loving Harry Potter! It's true that magic features
in many stories - good and bad. Arabian Nights tales, fairy godmothers,
Narnia (!)... all over the place. I used to fantasise I was the fairy
godmother from Cinderella, which would probably have struck most people
as cute. Magic is fun as a tool of the imagination - it is blatantly obvious
to most people who have enough knowledge that Harry Potter and real witchcraft
are incredibly dissimilar.
But most of all, the
thing that excites me is the comparisons with the message of Jesus...
who knows, maybe someone will hear the gospel and think 'Hey, it's like
Harry Potter!' and it will make sense.
(On an aside, of course
parents should be careful - if they aren't being careful on matters aside
from Harry Potter I want to know why.) I find the sensationalist regard
of Harry Potter, and Lord of the Rings for that matter, a bit misguided
at best. Love this site, keep up the good work.
Thanks, Helen
-<:Punctuality is the thief of time:>-
Response:
Thanks for the kind words. -David
|
|
MY
FAVORITE FILM -AND NOT JUST CAUSE I'M A GIRL
Subject: Prince_of_Egypt
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002
From: Emily
I saw The Prince
of Egypt when I was about... ten, was it? Um, 1998 was the year it was
released... I'm thirteen in February...er, yes! I was ten! So anyway,
I was ten years old. I had rarely read religious books, even for my age
group, but I knew the story vaguely. I was also unfamiliar with Dreamworks.
I was completely
electrified by The Prince of Egypt- and not just because I was a ten-year-old
girl. Yes, I did like the songs, but only because I basically like music
and the Hebrew in them interested me. My mother, then a grown woman with
three kids, also liked the movie, even if she did have to put up with
my little brother (then a small baby)- and not just because she's a mum.
We liked it because we thought it was a good movie, with animation that
I, personally (although at that age I wasn't rating the animation in movies
unless it really sucked) loved. I loved, and still love, the way the people
looked- I had been exposed to drawings of Exodus people with blonde hair,
blue eyes and brightly coloured, immaculate clothing- and the voices,
even if they were American, suited the characters. I am a serious writer
and have decided that if my stories are ever televised, I will help with
the casting. Because the people in my stories are English, French, South
American and other nationalities, thinking about it now... I even think
I don't suppose casting people Americans to play Ancient Hebrews in an
animated feature is that mad. IF IT'S PULLED OFF PROPERLY!
At the tender age
of ten, something that I really liked about this movie were the vast amounts
of children in it. Although none of them were in speaking parts (as far
as I can remember), other films seem to have scores of adults, teenagers
even- but they are devoid of people whom the younger audiences can relate
to. For some time, I liked to imagine what those kids must've felt like...
leaving the land where they'd spent all their lives, moving on to better
things. This is a point that will probably make everyone roll their eyes,
but the look of the kids in this film was one I really liked. They looked
really happy and suitably scruffy (I have a certian love for scruffiness,
maybe because I'm the living definition of the word!). AND NOT ONE PERSON
IN THE ENTIRE MOVIE WAS BLONDE! (No offense to blonde people. I mean,
I am a blonde person, but- GET- IT- RIGHT-! The Ancient Hebrews were not
blonde!)
The movie became my
favourite film. Although I now have other favourites (anything with Drew
Barrymore in it, the Harry Potter movie,
Shrek, Antz and Chicken
Run, if you're interested, and I'm guessing you're not), but it is
a movie that really got to me. It made me feel good to see it, and it
makes me feel good even now- and for reasons beyond my being young, a
girl, a music-lover and a kid.
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 136
|
Index
to all the comments Sep 13, 2001 to Mar 06, 2002
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 145 Mar
01-06, 2002
Go to page 144 Feb 18-28, 2002
Go to page 143 Feb 01-17, 2002
Go to page 142 Jan 25-31, 2002
Go to page 141 Jan18-24, 2002
Go to page 140 Jan 14-17, 2002
Go to page 139 Jan 13, 2002
Go to page 138 Jan 08-12, 2002
Go to page 137 Jan 06-07, 2002
Go to page 136 Jan 04-05, 2002
Go to page 135 Jan 01-03, 2002
Go to page 134 Dec 27-31, 2002
Go to page 133 Dec 21-26, 2001
Go to page 132 Dec 13-20, 2001
Go to page 131 Dec 06-12, 2001
Go to page 130 Dec
01-05, 2001
Go to page 129 Nov 28-30, 2001
Go to page 128 Nov 27, 2001
|
Go
to page 127 Nov 26, 2001
Go to page 126 Nov 20-25, 2001
Go to page 125 Nov 18-20, 2001
Go to page 124 Nov 15-18, 2001
Go to page 123 Nov 14-15, 2001
Go to page 122 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 121 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 120 Nov 08-12, 2001
Go to page 119 Nov 07, 2001
Go to page 118 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 117 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 116 Nov 1-5, 2001
Go to page 115 Oct 30-31, 2001
Go to page 114 Oct 23-29, 2001
Go to page 113 Oct 12-22, 2001
Go to page 112 Oct
01-11, 2001
Go to page 111 Sep 18-30, 2001
Go to page 110 Sep 13-17, 2001
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|