|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on December 30, 2001
|
|
RESPONSE
TO NEWSLETTER 31
MYTH
Subject: Myth_Is_Good_Newsletter_31
Myth.
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Kevin
Myths and/or stories,
can be used to teach. Even JESUS! used stories/parables to teach. I believe
that is a good way to teach, in a way we can understand. I.E. Santa Claus
is use to teach childeren about Christmas.!
Peace;<><:
Kevin.
http://community.webtv.net/KevinKunz/JESUSTHEWAY
Response:
Amen! -David
HP,
LOTR AND ENGLISH LIT 101
Subject: Harry Potter, Lord
of the Rings
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001
From: Tom Orr:
David: An interesting
and lively dialogue on these tales. I won't add a lot right now except
to say that Tolkien and Rowling fall squarely into a long and honorable
English story-telling tradition dating back to Malory, Spenser, and Shakespeare,
in which sorcery, magic, and enchantment serve as metaphors of the quest
for knowledge and power, which, of course, is at the heart of the greatest
story ever told in the New Testament. William Blake said, "Imagination
is the divine body of Christ." These are tales of imagination, not manuals
on witchcraft. May the saints preserve us from book-burners and the soothsayers
of ignorance. David, God bless you in your good work through hollywoodjesus.com.
Grace and peace.
--Tom Orr
Response:
You are so right. Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate them. -David
SO
WHAT DO YOU SUGGEST?
Subject: Change_Is_Good_for_Churches-
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Jeff Couch
I've heard a lot of
people say the same things you say, but no one seems to know how. There
is nothing I would rather do than to work in my church to reach other
Gen Xers and younger. I am 30 years old and am usually very involved in
my church. So what do you suggest? How do we take the movie myths and
make them relevant on a Sunday morning? How do we bring back the mystical
while teaching the Bible? What are your concrete suggestions?
I subscribe to this
site because I believe in the power of media. I am an amateur actor and
would like to see media work in the local church. Most plays I see in
churches are simply tolerated because they are productions by our church
family. Or they are big overdone productions to draw the boomers and their
parents. Christian movies are rarely any better. Where is our voice? Who
speaks for the Lord? Where is the voice of Jeremiah? Elijah and the others.
Where is the poetry and music of David and Solomon? Today we only recycle
their style we don't update for our era, we don't make it relevant to
our times. Have you seen Bibleman? Carman's movies? What does it take?
How do we become relevant? I would love your input.
Because I want to
make a difference,
Jeff Couch
Response:
Rev. Chuck Smith of Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa had the right idea some
35 years ago. He was of the WW2 generation (Builders). It was thought
at the time that Hippies were of the devil (bear feet, beards, long hair,
peace signs, rock music). He thought differently. You do not need to be
in a suit and tie to attend church. He went out and met the Hippies where
they were and invited them in for Bible study (a Bible rap). He welcomed
thier casual clothes and their music (which later became Maranatha music).
Calvary Chapel became the fastest growing church in the Western World!
Chuck Smith simply allowed a new generation place. He had no preconceived
ideas of what would take place. He just allowed a new generation to have
place. And it happened. Today Boomer churches pattern themselves off the
Calvary Chapel model, which is 35 years old and designed for the Boomer
generation. These are the Boomer churches which are the predominate form
today.
Just
5 years ago there was a huge battle in Evangelical and mainstream churches
for "Contemporary" worship music over the traditional organ
hymns. "Contemporary" music won. Today most Evangelical churches
(and many mainstream) have geared up to reach the Boomer generation (Gotta
reach "Saddleback Sam"). A Southern Baptist Boomer worship service
is exactly like an Assembly of God Boomer service is exactly like a Calvary
Chapel Boomer service. No distinctions, no creative differences. A long
opening of "Contemporary" music (Worship His Majesty -type songs)
where the greatest spiritual value is in how long you can stand with the
appearance of worshipping. Perhaps followed by announcements. Followed
by a 45 minute expository or thematic message from the Bible. The irony
is that the Boomer Generation is no longer responding to this style. To
put it bluntly churches today are stuck in a Hippie model.
We need
to go back to the example set 35 years ago and allow the younger generation
place. And let the Holy Spirit do the rest -just as Church Smith did.
It needs to happen with every generation. Each generation needs to pass
it on to the next. The problem is that the standard form of worship (which
is now "contemporary") becomes sacred and untouchable. Church
members view this as nonnegotiable.
I would
suggest that churches begin to encourage an outward focus. Instead of
throwing rocks at the world and preaching against it (isolationism), "go
ye into all the world." Meet people where they are. Allow their culture,
music and images to worship God. In short be a missionary. -David
WHERE
IS THE REFERENCE
Subject: Images_and_Post_Modern
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: J
You wrote in your
letter that: C.S. Lewis points out, "We must not be nervous about 'parallels'
and 'Pagan Christs' they ought to be there -it would be a stumbling block
if they weren't. We must welcome them not, in false spirituality, withhold
our imaginative welcome." I was wondering which of his writings you are
quoting from.
-J
Response:
CS Lewis, God in the Dock: Essays on Theology and Ethics,
ed. Walter Hooper (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1970, p. 66-67 -David
ENJOY
NEWSLETTER
Subject: Newsletter #31
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Glen
My wife and I thoroughly
enjoy reading the newsletters. We will keep reading. Keep up the good
work and thoughtful dialogue with your detractors. We have relatives that
we just can't understand on some of these same issues. I have shown them
your web site and hope that it can open some thoughtful exchanges with
more light that the usual heat.
Warmly, Glen
Response:
Thanks -David
THE
ONLY WAY TO EXPRESS THE DEEPEST REALITIES
Subject: Myth_Is_Good_Newsletter_31
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: "Robert Askren"
Greetings and Blessings
for the New Year! Poetry and Myth are the only way we humans have to express
the deepest meanings and realities in our experience. Truth is expressed
in story form so that everyone may experience the meaning in a personal
way and at different levels of understanding.
Warmly in the Lord,
The Rev. Robert D. Askren
LOOKING
FOR A PICTURE BIBLE
Subject: Images_and_Post_Modern
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Sue
I was fortunate enough
to visit Europe for the first time about five years ago. It was a wonderful
trip for many reasons but one of them was all the wonderful artwork in
the churches and museums there. I loved seeing all the paintings depicting
events from the Bible. They truly enhanced my imagination of the stories
heard for so many years and contruibuted to increased awe and worship
of our mighty God. I then began searching for an art book that had the
entire Bible represented with the paintings of the great artists. Now
I know that there are so many paintings by so many artisits of Bible events
that it would be impossible to put them all in a book but to my surprise
I could not find ONE book with such a theme. Recently I did stumble across
a book at the public library "The Bible and its Painters" by Bruce Bernard
but when I went to purchase it (thru amazon) I discovered it was no longer
published. Honestly, I cannot believe that every Christian bookstore does
not stock this book or one like it. I considered reporting the book lost
to the library and gladly paying the monies (comments on the ethics of
this are welcome) but a friend has found a place where I can order the
book so hopefully I can hold onto that shred of my integrity. Not sure
how all this plays into the discussion at hand but it does seem the evangelical
church has little regard for the arts and art history and is missing out
on a great feast and opportunity to feed the soul!
POST
MODERN CULTURE
Subject: Newsletter_31
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: J C
Hey David,
All I can say is for individuals to have a relationship with JESUS as
the center, not SELF nor DOCTRINES nor CHURCH nor CHRISTIANS. When you
follow Jesus and KNOW Him, He will lead you in a direction that is usually
not the one the church is taking, I'm sorry to say. The Holy Spirit may
lead you to screenwriting, directing, art, music...whatever, that isn't
considered "Christian"...however, He may lead you to reveal a message
through symbolism, dialogue, visual art w/ moving pictures...WHATEVER
He wants. Jesus came to seek and save the lost, not to judge....although
the church thinks they are better than Jesus since they've taken it among
themselves to judge. God will speak to humanity however He wants to, and
I for one have stopped trying to please the church. Everytime you try
to please "Christians" you will more than likely be wasting your time
not doing what Jesus wants you to do. You look around and see Christians
preaching to the choir and entertaining themselves w/religious "stuff"....Jesus
isn't concerned with entertaining Christians, He is concerned with drawing
humanity unto Himself. I told you awhile back how He lead me to write...and
it's not "religious". God has given me gifts that I see things very visual,
and He utilizes this in my writing..through symbolism, 3 dimensional characters
and dialogue. This is secondary....He wants to use me in other ways, but
art is a tool He said He was going to use to "place me/access" to an environment
He wants to use me further. Just do what Jesus has called you to do and
not focus so much on what the "church" thinks...you will wear yourself
out. As long as you know you are doing what He has asked you to do, you'll
be okay. Fellowship w/likeminded people if you have to.
In Him, J C
LITTLE
THINGS & LITTLE MEN
Subject: Myth_Is_Good_Newsletter_31
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Jakob
Hi, I think that it's
okay to relate to the truths of or belief in Christ through a story like
christmas or through a story like "Lord of the Rings", but I also think
that these should be pointers to and reminders of our relationship with
God. In themselves they are very little.
I watched "Lord of
the Rings" today and walked away from the cinema with a very positive
feeling. A feeling of hope. The characters in the film meets the same
challenge as we do: Hoping and believing in the true and good and acting
on it, even though we feel disempowered when facing evil, discovering
that it's often "little things" or "little men" that makes a change for
the good.
:-) Jakob
MYTH
IS THE ONLY THING FOR FAITH
Subject: Myth_Is_Good_Newsletter_31
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001
From: "Jon-Carl Lewis"
God is too big to
comprehend without myth. I realized this in my Church (Episcopalian) last
night when we did the whole salvation story reading scriptures from Genesis
to John 1. Its a beautiful myth and very, very true. Thanks for asking.
Jon-Carl Lewis
jcl@swcp.com
www.incarnatus.org/jcl
COMMENTS
ON CHANGE AND DIVORCE
Subject: Change_Is_Good_for_Churches-News31
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001
From: "Stu Prevost"
I feel that it is
important for our churches to change. I am from a local United Church
in eastern Ontario in Canada. The population of our church is a majority
of seniors. I have tried to work with the church board to bring about
change but have hit many roadblocks. They are afraid of change because
it will offend and may turn away some of our senior members who have the
money to give. My teenaged children refuse to go to church... they feel
there is nothing there for them. They believe in God and are grateful
for all He has given us. They feel that our church does not praise God.
They are the next generation of church goers and do not want to be there.
They have attended other churches (an hour away) and feel there is a feeling
of 'God' there. I believe it comes from the people they are with in the
'other' church and how they feel about praising God. This other church
is United as well. I do worry about the future of the church I used to
attend regularly - it is dying off and seems to not want to change the
trend..... there is a big interest in money.... they are always crying
about the lack of funds. My solution is to make the church a place for
people to be - an inviting place for 'the unchurched' and money will become
a minor problem - bring in the people and everything else will be fine.....BTW
I stopped going after an appealwas made to the congregation... it seemed
to me and others - the request was give more now and up your weekly contribution
or do not come through the door.... I did express this concern to the
ministers.
Divorce... my theory...we
have been brought up as a generation that replaces things that do not
work. Our computer is not fast enough.... buy a new one (or upgrade the
parts), our watch stops working.... throw it out, buy a new one. Same
with almost everything we own.... replace it with a newer, better model.
I feel tat this is the way we have begun to think of marriage.... this
spouse is not living up to my expectations.... time to move on and get
a new model. A throw away society means we can do this with all things.....
I even know parents who have thrown out their older children and started
new families...... BTW - MAy 14 I celebrate 20 years of Marriage to my
first choice for wife.... I plan on keeping this model for a long, long
time.....
Stu Prevost
THE
RIGHTNESS OF CS LEWIS ETC
Subject: JRR_Tolkien_.is_Right_On
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: "Laury Morrison"
Yes I do. CS Lewis
was one of the best writers of the last Century. God primarily wrote the
Bible as a story. Good stories communicate god's themes because this is
His world and everybody writing story whether they believe in him or not
will somewhere in their story bring out truth. E.g. the movie E.T was
a wonderful picture of the resurrection, or going "home" to heaven. It
was produced by a Jew - Spielberg.
Laury Morrison
SOME
GENERAL THOUGHTS
Subject: Newsletter_31
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001
From: RICK
I got online today,
after having spent a truly blessed Christmas eve with family and friends
at a meal, then at church, and we exchanged some simple gifts.
I then had a relaxing
Christmas Day itself, which included going to see Lord of the Rings: The
Fellowship of the Ring.
I have read the books
twice, and intend to read them again. But I wanted to see this first movie
before rereading.
The movie was absolutely
incredible and moving. There is a great deal of power in the story and
the movie.
It amazes me that
there are Christians who just mouth (repeat) what they hear, what they
are told, and do not learn about what is being talked about. A Christian
who never heard of Lewis, one of the greatest apologists for Christianity
in the 20th century? Someone who didn't know that Tolkien and Lewis were
both Christian, with STRONG Christian foundations in their fiction?
Come on, people, read
your Bible as a whole piece of work, and then READ WHAT YOU ARE CRITICIZING,
as a whole piece of work, to see what the point is, and judge from there.
As far as the piece
on change.....I have had very ambivalent feelings there....there are times
when change is needed in order to be relevant, but at the same time, tradition
is meaningful to many.
I don't feel comfortable
with change just for the sake of change, nor do I think we should necessarily
keep a tradition, just because "it has always been done that way."
Faith and reason must
work together, I think, to help us walk this delicate line.
Humbly yours in Christ,
Rick Bavera
|
|
CHRISTIAN
UNDERTONES AND OVERTONES
Subject: The Shawshank Redemption
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: Kim
Thank you for your
automated response to my guest book signing :) A question off the bat
(so to speak) is will there be a Web review at Hollywood Jesus?
Secondly, how are
you?
I first discovered
Hollywood Jesus by watching a secular TV program that focused on Web reviews.
They gave HJ 8/10 :)
Also I watched you
comment on "The Shawshank Redemption" as my national Channel 4 ran through
the 100 greatest movies (viewers choice). I find it funny how people (generally)
are attracted to Christian undertones in films like Shawshank, Superman,
Star Wars, Lord Of The Rings etc, and yet any film that brings Christianity
to the surface / forefront seemingly turn people away and bring out anger
and conflict (that meant to come out as an opinion; I hope it did lol).
Oh, a friend of mine
told me recently that The Chronicles Of Narnia has just gone into film
production. Should be fun :)
Lots of love Kim
|
|
ON
MITHRAS
THE
FACTS, PLEASE!
Subject: Mithras
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001
From: leia
Hi, I've been studying
the Council of Nicea and Constantine. This in turn, lead me to websites
of various nature, some of which discuss the pagan foundations of many
of our christian holidays, which in turn lead me to a study of Mithraism
and that's how I found your site. My question is this: After having read
over countless theories, philosophies, opinions and testimonies regarding
the pagan connection, would it be possible for if you were to ask those
who post here to include some sort of historical documentation, quotes,
footnotes, ANYTHING, to support their version of the retelling of history?
So much word of mouth clouds the intellect and meshes fiction with fact
in such a way that it is nigh on impossible to provide support for a single
relevant thought when studying the issue. If all we have is a bunch of
unsubstantiated claims without not so much as a single bit of historical
proof, then it boils down to a shouting match and who can generate the
most friction for their side of the argument. This should not be the way
history is retold, even if that history is based on mythos. Let's have
some facts and documentation pleeeeeease, please, please. Beth
Response:
Thanks Beth. -David
PAUL
COULD HAVE...
Subject: Mithras
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001
From: Stephen
I've did some research
into the subject of early Christianity, and I learned that the early Christians
believed Jesus was a Prophet, and over a period of time this belief developed
into the belief that Jesus is God (this concept appeared in 381 AD with
the adoption of Doctrine of the Trinity)... (You might wish to check into
that one again, friend. The belief in that Jesus and God were the same
was affirmed by the Church in the Nicean Council over 55 years earlier
than your date. That belief wasn't invented at the Nicean Council, only
formalized. The belief that, as Jesus said, "I and the Father are one",
was one held by Christians since the first century.) On one of your responses
to an email on your site you said that it would be impossible for Paul
to indoctrinate a foreign belief into Christianity, I disagree because
we have to remember that Paul worked among the Gentiles (non Jews) hence
changing the belief would be rather easy, and the notion of motive also
exists, we know that Paul believed Jesus would come again within his life
time, so his intentions became to convert as many followers as possible,
so perhaps to make conversions of certain peoples easier, he adopted some
of their spiritual beliefs (mithraism).
So my question basically
is, is their a large possibility that certain portions of Christian Doctrine
(examples: Resurection/Jesus being a "saviour"/Jesus being "God"/etc,etc)
have Pagan origin?
Response:
Thank you for a well reasoned argument. The concept of Jesus as God in
flesh was not unique to Paul, as you say it was common to first century
Christians.You seem to answer your own question in regards to Paul. Additionally
Mithras was not considered to be God incarnate. That said, it is also
my belief that such myths as Mithras did prepare the way for Jesus. There
are lots of myths that predate Jesus about a dying and reviving god. These
myths were, in a sense, prophetic and point to Jesus. I believe the same
as JRR Tolkien and CS Lewis in this regard.
In terms
of differences between Paganism and Christianity, historian Robin Lane
Fox states that almost all of the so-called continuities are spurious.
He notes that the Christian teaching of charity and the worth of the poor,
along with the introduction of the idea of sin, constituted something
new within the Roman empire. Also, he states, "Any account of pagan
worship which minimizes the god's uncertain anger and mortal's fear of
it is an empty account." Nor were pagans exhorted to respond to divinely
revealed truths. There was no sense, in pagan cults, of members' obligations
to a definite moral code that was followed in the adoration of a god.
The concept of a one true God did not exist in the Roman mind. Incarntion
and virgin birth were rare features of pagan gods. -David
|
|
COMMENTS
ON 9-11
Subject: Newsletter 29
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001
From: "Doctor Jones"
I have a few comments
to make on the subject of 9-11-01 and some things that I read here on
this site. First I would like to say that I do not see that day as a judgement
from God but an early warning sign. A precursor as to what will take place
in this world. I believe that we live in an evil wicked generation and
that we will reap the consequences for all things done. Whether we had
a hand in it personally or whether we stood by and watched.
We as christians have
failed to live as Christ would. We have failed to extend grace to one
another and we have failed to follow the ways of Christ. The love of God
has been abused in this world and in the ever changing cultural atmosphere
we live in. There was a time that the things we so readily accept today
were not only not acceptable but deserving of death. Things have changed.
We no longer protect our children as closely as we should. They see almost
everything that the world has to offer. They are exposed to sex, violence,
lies and witchcraft. This because we see it as harmless fun. They watch
and play all sorts of video games. Think about it, when we are called
to be Holy, what exactly does that mean? When we are set apart by God
what does that mean? I have not allowed my children to see Harry Potter
because the Holy Spirit has convicted me of the place of witchcraft in
a believers life. He has shown me that the things the world so readily
accepts we shouldn't be. Sure it might makes us more fun to be around
but what does it get us in eternity?
I am not a fear mongerer
neither am I a hater of myths. I do know that if God is not glorified
I don't need to be involved. Judgement is going to be an awful thing for
unbelievers. It will expose us christians for who we truly are. What happened
on Sept. 11th won't hold a candle to what is going to happen when God's
wrath is poured out on this world. That is a point we should take very
seriously.
If Harry Potter and
the Lord of the Rings have a hint of things that God said is unacceptable
should we accept them? I believe that we as Americans have been so blessed
with freedoms that we forget that there is ultimately a consequence to
everything. So the next time someone says that something is wrong do not
be so quick to say be tolerant. That word doesn't appear in the Bible.
Be quicker to stop and think what reward or consequence will this earn
me. Because ultimately that is what we are to be working for.
Salvation has been
offered to us at a high price. Let's stop playing with that and take on
the attitude that the one who offered it does not accept what we do because
it makes us look or feel good. Or puts us in good standing with those
around us. God will not and is not looking at that as much as our holding
to His word and living by uncompromising standards.
I have not always
been a Christian and it amazes me how much people who claim to be christian
are oh so willing to mix the world with the truth. Remember the scripture
about leaven? It leaveneth the whole lump! Are you leavened or unleavened?
Response:
The Isolationism that you are endorsing in the name of children is dangerous.
You go too far in questioning CS Lewis and JRR Tolkien. The Shakers held
isolationist views like you and today they are no more. The heart of Christianity
is found in dirty finger nails. "Go ye into all the world..."
Use culture to win culture. Salvation has do with what Jesus did. Being
in the world and exposed to the world does not subtract anything from
Salvation. The leaven that you speak of has to do with adding my own righteousness
to the work of Christ. This is the essence of witchcraft. You fall into
the very pit you try to avoid: Consider Galations 3:1-5,
Galatians
3:1-5 You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before
your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly exhibited as crucified! The
only thing I want to learn from you is this: Did you receive the
Spirit by doing the works of the law or by believing what you heard?
Are you so foolish? Having started with the Spirit, are you now ending
with the flesh? Did you experience so much for nothing?--if it really
was for nothing. Well then, does God supply you with the Spirit and
work miracles among you by your doing the works of the law, or by your
believing what you heard?
|
|
ORIENTALISM
PLEASE, JAPAN?
Subject: Crouching_Tiger
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001
From: Monkiki
This message is coming
a bit late, but I've only recently found the website. I doubt that the
two people to whom I'm writing in response will check this message board
again, but I'd just like to clarify a few points. First of all, Michael
says that the Orient and the Far East are not figments of the European
imagination, and that you should "call them as you see them." I'm sorry,
Michael, but they most emphatically are and by refusing to recognize the
latent racism in these monikers, you are subscribing to the objectification
and racial stereotyping of a whole set of cultures and ethnicities. I
suggest you read Edward Said's "Orientalism" for more on why you should
not use those ignorant and offensive terms. Secondly, to Tracey Bauer,
"college student" - in scrolling down past a few more entries, I noticed
that you said you had been exploring Japanese culture and products of
it - such as this movie. I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Crouching
Tiger is a CHINESE movie, and how it is a product of the Japanese culture
is beyond me. As a Chinese American graduate student working towards my
PhD in East Asian Studies, I believe you are suffering from delusions
of Japanese grandeur. Firstly, Japan started off, millenia ago, as a tributary
race of China. Much of its own culture derives from extensive borrowing
and copying of Chinese culture. Secondly, to say that a Chinese movie
is a product of Japanese culture is ridiculous and pathetic, at best.
I'm not saying that Japan does not have a nice culture of its own, but
please get your facts straight before posting idiocy.
Chen
|
|
SCIENTOLOGY
Subject: The Others
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001
From: "Greg Estes"
I found The
Others entertaining and interesting however I think the maker of this
film had an agenda. It's no coincidence that it was produced by Tom Cruise,
a known supporter of Scientology, with his wife (at the time) Nicole Kidman,
also of Scientology faith, in a leading role.
After watching
the movie I felt that a religion had been introduced to me and not being
an expert on Scientology, I looked up information on it and found some
interesting themes that were in the movie such as reincarnation and an
over all theme that we are God of our lives. The movie made not so subtle
criticisms of the Catholic faith while promoting Scientology to the point
that it was almost an advertisement to visit your local church of Scientology.
I encourage viewers of this movie to read about that religion and you
will see it in the work of Tom Cruise.
As I said,
I enjoyed the movie and in no way am I saying don't see it, but just pointing
out that you may want to think about what you are seeing and why. It helped
open my eyes to this growing religion and how to recognize those themes
in movies. By the way, I am not a Scientologist nor Catholic.
Greg
Response:
Thanks for your input. There is nothing in the film that promotes Scientology
at all. The film is not about reincarnation, nor any other doctrine of
Scientology. The film is about crsis of faith and coming to terms with
experiences that run counter to our belief system. -David
|
|
SWEET
Subject: Gone in Sixty Seconds
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001
From: Gertrude
these cars
are so sweet.. specially Eleanor,, the best leading lady there could be
. Only one actresse can top her , that's Angelina Jolie especially when
she plays roles such as that of Sara "Sway" Wayland... Nicholas Cage plays
the best car thief,,, swave, devenaire.I couldn't nam,e a favorite scene
because i love em all. I love the "What's better ; stealing cars or having
sex" even better is Nicholas Cage's answer " How about having sex WHILE
STEALING CARS?" And who wouldn't the jump scene?? This is the ultimate
movie,, especially for anyone tired of their everyday life and want an
escape.... "Sway" (all my friends think i look like that caracter & have
the same personality)
|
|
INQUIRING
ABOUT CORRELATION
Subject: Lord of the Rings
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001
From: Rachel~
I have questions concerning
the J.R. Tolkien trilogy. It is my understanding that Mr. Tolkien was
a christian and that the story of Lord of the Rings has direct correlation
to christian beliefs. (This is true) Have I
been misinformed? (No you have not) Do you have
any insight concerning this matter or know someone who does? WHere can
I go to obtain this information? Rachel~
Response:
You have come to the right place. -David
|
|
KINKADE
AND ART
Subject: Newsletter 27
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001
From: One o' da Butsons
David,
I understand you frustration with the Christian culture and its obsession
with "turning back the clock" to a more innocent time. It's perfectly
understandable, yet Ecclesiastes 7:10 states
"Do not say, "Why
is it that the former days were better than these?" For it is not from
wisdom that you ask this."
Pretty clear advice
about too much nostalgia, eh? Thomas Kinkade's work is attractive, but
it does indeed is completely absent of conflict or evidence of sin in
the world. A recent CD issue of Mars Hill audio discussed this very issue
with a Christian art professor (I can't find my copy to give you the exact
information) and the conversation hit on exactly the problem I have with
the "movement" of this kind of art. You would find this discussion very
insightful for this subject. IN his work, there's no grace neither evidence
of a NEED for grace. Art that proclaims Christian truth will somehow have
the theme of sin salvation and redemption woven through it.
My personal issues
with Thomas Kinkade may be picky, but here goes. . .He has the TRADEMARK
of "Painter of Light", which tells me there's some market-driven thought
going on here. There are numerous storefronts in malls with his name on
them as outlets for not only prints but calendars, journals, nightlights,
plates, but even books. He joins the many Christians in the marketplace
who are making a name and market for themselves all in the name of "influencing
the culture for Christ". I find the whole thing rather sickening, frankly.
Yes, I do listen to
Christian radio, but for the teaching that's Biblical and nourishing to
my soul. Otherwise, my daughter and I are "embracing the oldies" for some
fun (vintage Michael Jackson to dance to) and out there with friends and
neighbors in our town. The goal? For God to use us as He sees fit in our
circle of friends and family. We don't have time to get too nostalgic
about much of anything right now!!!!
Blessings,
Marie from OH
Response:
Thank you for your comments. Dancing with friends as evangelism. Involvement
with your daughter. Hmm. I think I like this. Blessings on you. -David
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 133
|
Index
to all the comments Sep 13, 2001 to Mar 06, 2002
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 145 Mar
01-06, 2002
Go to page 144 Feb 18-28, 2002
Go to page 143 Feb 01-17, 2002
Go to page 142 Jan 25-31, 2002
Go to page 141 Jan18-24, 2002
Go to page 140 Jan 14-17, 2002
Go to page 139 Jan 13, 2002
Go to page 138 Jan 08-12, 2002
Go to page 137 Jan 06-07, 2002
Go to page 136 Jan 04-05, 2002
Go to page 135 Jan 01-03, 2002
Go to page 134 Dec 27-31, 2002
Go to page 133 Dec 21-26, 2001
Go to page 132 Dec 13-20, 2001
Go to page 131 Dec 06-12, 2001
Go to page 130 Dec
01-05, 2001
Go to page 129 Nov 28-30, 2001
Go to page 128 Nov 27, 2001
|
Go
to page 127 Nov 26, 2001
Go to page 126 Nov 20-25, 2001
Go to page 125 Nov 18-20, 2001
Go to page 124 Nov 15-18, 2001
Go to page 123 Nov 14-15, 2001
Go to page 122 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 121 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 120 Nov 08-12, 2001
Go to page 119 Nov 07, 2001
Go to page 118 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 117 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 116 Nov 1-5, 2001
Go to page 115 Oct 30-31, 2001
Go to page 114 Oct 23-29, 2001
Go to page 113 Oct 12-22, 2001
Go to page 112 Oct
01-11, 2001
Go to page 111 Sep 18-30, 2001
Go to page 110 Sep 13-17, 2001
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|