|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on November 29, 2001
|
|
PROPAGANDA
Subject: re:
Chocolat
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001
From: Katy
Could be viewed as
pure propaganda. Technically, this was not such a great film---good, but
not great. Why all the Academy Award nominations? The Academy Awards are
close to being a farce, they are so "political" (sort of like the Miss
America Pageant). If your eyes are open, it's amazing what you see. It's
also amazing how easily people are hypnotized.
Response:
Hypnotized to what? What are you talking about? -David
|
|
THOUGHTS
ON 9/11
Subject: Newsletter_29
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001
From: Alan Meyers
I very much appreciate
your remarks about the meaning of September 11 from a Christian point
of view. (I have only just today been introduced to your Website; sorry
this is so late.) I am in agreement with you, certainly. But, without
going along with the views expressed by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson,
I have to say that I understand, generally speaking, where they're coming
from. Those of us who are grounded in the Bible are familiar with the
assumption that God is in control of history and uses events to achieve
his purposes. Among the chief exponents of this idea are the prophets
of Israel. When Jeremiah saw the Babylonians at the gates of Jerusalem,
he just naturally figured that they were there doing God's will, even
though the Babylonians themselves may not have known that. He took the
destruction of the holy city to be God's judgment on his people for their
sins. This was the common belief of the Old Testament prophets generally.
Falwell and Robertson see themselves, no doubt, as playing the role of
the prophets for our time and for the American people: they feel they
need to interpret events of the day in light of God's purposes and God's
actions. Given their assumptions about what the main things are that Americans
are doing wrong today (abortion, homosexuality, etc.), it seems only natural
to interpret the events of 9/11 as judgment on those things. An interesting
point to me is that some people other than Falwell and Robertson base
their thinking less consciously on the Bible but still think Biblically,
in that they, too, assume that America's own actions have brought this
destruction on us; the only difference is that they think it is things
like our siding with Israel and our support of dictatorial regimes, etc.,
that have caused many in the world to hate us and so incited terrorism.
But they are still thinking like the prophets, in a way. Biblical thinking
is VERY deeply ingrained in America, much more than secular-minded people
think. My question is: how can we RESPONSIBLY take a Biblical point of
view, one that Isaiah and Micah and Amos and Jeremiah would have found
acceptable, toward the events of the day? Is there NO sense in which 9/11
represents God's judgment? Does the Old Testament prophets' approach have
relevance for us 21st century American Christians? I'd be interested in
your thoughts on this.
Thanks. -- Alan Meyers
Response:
There is no sense that 9/11 is an action of God. Period. Innocent people
were killed. Children were left without parents. Believers died. People
that needed to respond to the gospel died. Judgment is a future -end of
the world- event, according to scripture. -David
|
|
THE
MOTHMAN LIVES...
Subject: The
Mothman Lives...
Date: 14 Nov 2001
From: amy
Hey, I have some really
cool news I thought you would be interested in hearing about. The official
Mothman Prophecies site will go live TONIGHT AT MIDNIGHT, November 15th,
which marks the anniversary of the first Mothman sighting 36 years ago
in Point Pleasant, West Virginia.
Here is the official
URL: www.themothmanlives.com
What is the mothman?
The legend of the mothman is based on actual events. The mothman is believed
to be a strange bird-like creature whose presence in 1965 brought chaos
to the local community in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. Strange and unusual
occurrences happened within the town, which culminated to the collapse
of a bridge where 46 people died. Witnesses claimed to have seen the Mothman
on the bridge as it collapsed. Since then, random sightings have occurred
throughout the world. No one can explain the mysterious occurrences around
this legend.
Themothmanlives.com
has some unique features that you will want to check out: ·
The History of the
Mothman ·
The Legend of the Mothman ·
World Sightings ·
Content Depot (web content such as photos, banners, press info, etc)
·
Mothmania (merchandise from the movie) ·
The Mothman Prophecies (the movie coming out Jan. 25, 2002) ·
Links (Related Mothman links)
If you are interested
in posting any of the content from this website on yours, please let me
know and I would be happy to work with you. Go ahead and post that
Themothmanlives.com
is now LIVE and I will be happy to send you some more great content.
Thanks and I look forward to working with you,
Amy
|
|
I DON'T
AGREE WITH EVERYTHING I READ
Subject: Lord_of_Rings
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001
From: "7thSon"
The Lord of the rings
has more to do with polytheism, if it is at all religious. For the descendants
living in middle earth in the 3rd and 4th age, the achievements of the
Valar and other earlier races have become mythical because they happened
so long ago. Reading faith and religion into it is not needed. The arcane
constitutes a large part of Tolkien's world and comes to assert itself
in various ways. The classical summoning of elements to strike down foes
and whatnot is only a small part of it. We all know that Gandalf is a
great public speaker and is able to convince good men that they have strayed
away from the path of "goodness". This ability is a kind of magic in its
own right, in Tolkien's world that is.
It is true that there
are some parallels between Christian lore and Tolkien's works, but unless
you go looking for them they don't have to be interpreted thusly. Personally
I prefer to look on The Lord of the Rings as an epic tale of high adventure.
It is a compelling story which appeals strongly to us by its complex setting,
wonderfully detailed descriptions and it was the first of a new genre
of literature, namely fantasy.
In short, I don't
see any reason to put Christianity and Tolkien in the same sentence. It
seems to me that if a religious person can't read a work of fiction without
thinking that it is some kind of attack on their faith, then they aren't
very sure of themselves are they? The Lord of the Rings is just a good
story nothing more...
(I must apologize
for my meager use of english. I am Danish and it has been some time since
I have written in english. ;-)
|
|
GOOD
STUFF!
Subject: Tool_Lateralus
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: Tim
This is a really
good album. Tools last two albums have been amazing. Well worth investigating.
|
|
IT
IS WRITTEN
Subject: Newsletter_30_Harry_Potter
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: joseph
I don't quite know
who you are or how I got on your mailing list and I would generally just
cancel out of your e-mail but I'm trying to be loving towards a fellow
Christian.
I don't know if you
receive any opposing points of view as loving, but I guess I'll try. On
Harry Potter " the positive values".........the bait on the end of a fishhook
is edible and good but NOT REALLY. The devil comes as an angel of light
or so IT IS WRITTEN in 2:Cor.11:14. IT IS WRITTEN is good enough for me,
Jesus used it as a weapon against evil in Matt.4: 4-6. IT IS WRITTEN is
a guide throughout scripture, God even wrote it down for Moses. The Word
is to be received not as restrictions or rules but as a relationship......The
Word is a Person. Jn.1:1. See Ps 40:7,8 This Word or book is written of
the Lord and to do God's will he had to have the law in his heart. The
people of the Word may seem narrow and restricting but are they really.
It is the rebellious people who want to "add" to the word.........LIKE
the devil, Eve etc. IT IS WRITTEN in Matt. 7:14 " narrow is the way that
leadeth to life". If as in Gal.5:9 " a little leaven leaveneth the whole
lump", what good would a little truth be in a whole lot of leaven? {Re.
Jen's "positive value"]. Yes, God speaks through ordinary people but it
always must line up with IT IS WRITTEN.
Response:
I agree with you about the power of the Word of God. And I believe Harry
Potter can be used positively. Thank you for the gracious way you write
you disagreement. I appreciate that. -David
|
|
HARRY
POTTER IS SPIRITUALLY DESTRUCTIVE
Subject: Newsletter_30_Harry_Potter
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: Bethany Renfrow
Mr. Bruce,
I appreciate a platform from which I may express my thoughts. I do believe
that Harry Potter is dangerous, but I am not afraid. The reason I would
not go see the movie or read the books (I have read summaries of the books)
is because I believe that these things are spiritually destructive. As
a Christian, I strive to live according to the guidelines set forth in
the Bible. I have not read passages in the bible where it said that practicing
witchcraft was ok. The Harry Potter series would lead someone to believe
that Witchcraft, sorcery, the occult, are all ok. (I
am curious. Do you think the same about Cinderella and Peter Pan? If not,
why not? -David) However, I have read passages in the Bible that
strongly condemned those practices (Deut. 18:10-12 & Revelation 9:20-21.
There are no good witches! That is a deception.
My goal in my response
to this Harry Potter phenomena is not to alienate anyone. I simply want
to put forward God's truth.it is powerful enough to do the rest. I have
every intention on presenting God's truth with love and compassion, not
in the manner of a so-called witch hunt. (Good for
you -David)
To me, Harry Potter
is so clearly against God's word that I find it hard to actually use it
for the Glory of God. I am excited for the opportunity to speak God's
truth concerning the occult. I have encountered many different people
and have been able to converse with them concerning spiritual matters
because of Harry Potter. (Great, wonderful. Go girl
go)
I must respond to
an e-mail you received in which the author emphasized the fact that we
are dealing with fiction. I would assume by that statement that the author
really is ignorant of the occult. The research I have down concerning
J.K. Rowling reveals that she has done her research. Many aspects of the
occult and witchcraft portrayed in the books are based upon real practices
of the occult. Children, or adults, are deceived to think that the occult
practices in the Harry Potter books are fictitious. Those practices are
based upon real practices by real "Witches" and real pagans.
(Riding brooms, for example?)
Please let me reiterate
that I am not afraid nor am I screaming at every child I see with a Harry
Potter book. (Good! -David) As a Christian I
cannot simply be defensive in this matter, I must also be offensive. I
will not simply remove myself from all things Harry Potter. I will take
every opportunity to speak God's truth concerning this matter and I will
do it, with God's help, in a way that is honoring to God. If my motives
were to simply prove people wrong I might use the screaming tactic. Because
my motives are to see people living in as much freedom as possible and
in a relationship with Jesus Christ I will converse with love and respect
with everyone I encounter.
Sincerely,
Bethany Renfrow
Response:
I appreciate the manner in which you disagree with me. You seem to be
a kind and considerate woman. Thank you. -David
|
|
MOM'S
APPROVAL
Subject: Something_To_Sing_About
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: "Lela McNary"
As a mother of two
pre-teen boys, who by the way happen to be black...did you know that the
life expectancy for a black male is only 18...I appreciated having something
to show my kids that supported and encouraged the values that my husband
and I are trying to teach our sons. In a world where most television shows
for children, pre-teens, and everyone else under the age of 40, is geared
to the weird, and demonic, I gave this movie "two thumbs up". After reading
some of the comments, I have to say, though with as much love as I have
in me, it might not have had all the glitz, polish and special effects
of some of the industry's "finest", but it was something that a parent
could feel comfortable letting their children watch. We need more of this
kind of television! Most of what's out there, we do not let them see,
(we preview all movies, music and television, before allowing them to
watch or listen to it), but they sat with me and enjoyed this one very
much. We aren't the "black family" that most people see on television;
I am married to my sons' father, neither of us have ever been arrested
for selling drugs, pimping or prostitution, we own two companies and they
both have to do with the entertainment industry, we don't abuse our sons
and could be described more as an average middle class family, (without
having to add the black or white to it, what does it matter anyway...poor
people are poor people, trashy people or trash regardless of race). My
point in saying all of that is this, it was refreshing to see a television
show that didn't give my sons the impression that because they are black
males, they can only aspire to a life of crime. And if they did happen
to go that way, there was a way out of it. It didn't just appeal to a
certain demographic, but could be enjoyed by a multigenerational group.
Needless to say...I loved it! Thanks for your time and God's richest to
you.
--- Lela McNary
|
|
MY
INTERPRETATION
Subject: Jacobs Ladder
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: Michael petersoncello@yahoo.com
I have just viewed
"Jacob's Ladder" for the first time. I had the advantage of having read
a number of comments and opinions on the meaning of the film, so I did
not find it hard to follow. Still, uncertainties remain, but I'll give
some of my thoughts. I've downloaded but not viewed the more complete
original screenplay, which I suppose could blow my interpretation out
of the water, since it apparently makes some things much more explicit.
I go along with the
view that the Vietnam "flashbacks" and the final scene in the Army hospital
are the only things which don't happen inside Jacob's head. I also lean
toward the view that the Ladder drug is real, and that Jacob himself is
its real inventor. But I don't believe that Jacob actually took the drug
himself, nor is the drug necessarily the cause of his mistaken stabbing
by another soldier in his unit. Someone on this page made a good point
that the other soldiers really didn't die, since the hospital at the end
is almost empty, instead of full of casualties. I think that "Professor"
(as he's called) Jacob came out of the woods at the beginning knowing
that the others were about to experience something different from "bad
weed", and that the grotesque head wobbling, vomiting, etc. were the real
effects of the drug. But I think the drug wore off quickly and the soldiers
went on to fight successfully. But Jacob was mistakenly stabbed and feared
that it was the result of the drug. So he went into hallucinations, not
because he was drugged, but simply because he was dying. But his fears
about the results of his own experiment grew into the story line in which
(at least in one dream scenario) the soldiers had killed each other.
I don't know if the
writer of the story ever studied any Gestalt psychology, but if memory
serves me right, Gestalt dream interpretation upholds the principle that
everything in a dream somehow is an aspect of the dreamer himself/herself.
This is one reason why I support the idea that Michael is a personification
of Jacob himself dealing with guilt over what he thinks he's done to his
Army buddies.
I don't know whether
Gabriel ever really died in Jacob's pre-war life, or if he ever really
cheated on his wife, but I think the scenes with Sarah and Jezebel are
based upon actual situations in his past, now being employed to sort out
his personal issues as he's dying. So what was a high-tech chemist doing
working as a postman in his pre-war life? Maybe it was some kind of cover
for his real job. Truly a postman with "friends in high places." I don't
know whether this film views the angels and demons as real or just a product
of Jacob's religiously trained imagination. My impression is that the
character Jacob Singer is Jewish, perhaps a relative of Isaac Bashevis?
:o) As far as I remember all the Biblical names used in the film are from
the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) except fellow soldier Paul, but
I think that's just because it's the soldier's real name, no symbolism
involved. So is Jezebel even a real person in Jacob's pre-war life? Who
knows? I've never met anyone named Jezebel, but in filmland anything's
possible! Maybe she was real but named something else, "Jezebel" being
Jacob's assessment of her real character, though he was attracted to her.
I personally think
the "demons are really angels" theology is the weakest part of this film.
In my own theology angels are really angels and demons are really demons,
and both are real. It shouldn't surprise us that Hollywood would come
up yet another warm fuzzy dualistic theology akin to the Force/Dark Side
thing. I think Danny Aiello should have gotten an award, though, for his
flawless portrayal of Louie the Angelic Chiropractor. So why doesn't he
have a biblical name? Maybe because Jacob really had a chiropractor named
Louie, and that's that. Unlike some, I think the ending was generally
strong, because the previous unnerving twists made me suspicious that
the happy ending really wasn't coming just yet. When Jacob and Gabriel
really disappeared peacefully into the light, I felt an unusually gratifying
relief from suspense. So I think that's a good sign of well-handled suspense.
You may include my
e-mail address, but only my first name,
Michael. petersoncello@yahoo.com
Thanks!
|
|
TAKE
A CHILL PILL PEOPLE!
Subject: Megadeth_The_World_Needs_A_Hero
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: "tim lessels"
Take a chill pill
people! stop being so intense with one another! if you cant treat each
other right then u cant convice non-christians christianity is true. I
have no problems with listening to "heavy metal" that is lyrically sound.
In my experiance "secular music" is more sound than the socalled "praise"
songs we sing on sundays!
However im not convinced
that "megadeth" is a healthy option in general (i say this as an ex-fan)
when i became a christian, their lyrical content became undesirable and
irrelevant (although their riffs still rock!). However i have not heard
"looking up the cross", and so will check it out :)
As a ex-fan i dont
recall their music being "satanic" although there are some bands to be
wary of (ie. slayer, pantera). However Metallica, U2, Delirious, etc.
have a combination of good songs and bad ones. Don't throw out the baby
with the bath water. but dont drink the bath water either.
And to "seekingthelord"
guy. Don't become so heavenly minded that your of no earthly use! When
we die, we are dead until the ressurection. Then God will create "a new
heavens and a NEW EARTH". better get used to living on earth cause we
don't go to heaven!!!
|
|
RESPONSE
TO CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALIST REMARKS
Subject: newsletter_29
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
Hi, Bruce:
I thank you for your newsletter remarks re: the Fundamentalist's responses
to the events of 9/11/01. It is my deepest conviction that the spirit
of the Christian far right is part of the enemy we face in the present
crisis. Our enemy is, in part,, etc., the evil, dark spirit of spiritual
ignorance. That spirit is evidenced in every person, group, cell, movement,
etc., that moves to the radical right with extreme hatred for everyone
not agreeing with their particular "system" whether that system be political,
social, economical, moral, or religious. So, I think that your observation
that the spirit of these radical "Bible thumpers" is of the same ilk as
that of Osama bin Laden and company is exactly right on. They, and their
spirit, are part of the present great enemy of the civilized world.
With this observation
fixed in mind, I want to say a word against the concept of tolerance.
I believe that the push for tolerance has in it seeds of destruction.
Here's why I believe so: for there to be tolerance, it is necessary for
one party to feel superior to the other(s) involved.
Tolerance says: "In
this arrangement for us to be good neighbors (or, whatever), I (or, we)
feel that I (we) are superior to you; but, I (we) will tolerate you."
I believe that tolerance has to be examined, and replaced with acceptance.
The true compassion
of God's love expressed in Jesus Christ (John 3:16) is the greatest evidencing
of God's acceptance over against judgment of us otherwise ill-deserving
beings. God's love is not tolerance. It's acceptance! In my relationships
I want and need to be accepted, not tolerated -- even by God. Therefore,
I am praying for the spirit of honoring acceptance to prevail across ethnic,
racial, political, religious, moral boundaries that are artificially,
arbitrarily established and maintained by our differing cultures. The
inability or unwillingness of any one or any grouping of us to do this
is our burden of guilt. Just to put this in perspective of pop culture
-
I am 71 years of age,
a struggling Christian on a journey with a mission, pastor of the First
United Church of Christ, Sandusky, OH.
Peace, with love,
Dan Ward
Response:
I really like the "acceptance over against judgment" that you
put forth. Your insights are very insightful. Thank you for your many
years of service to the Lord pastor. -David
|
|
MORE
RESPONSES TO NEWSLETTER #30
PHILIPPIANS
4:8
Subject: Harry_Potter_Can_Be_Used_Positively_Newsletter_30
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: Kim L Jeffery
Dear David,
I have been thinking constantly about your last two newsletters since
they arrived and I am struck by the different direction you are approaching
Philippians 4:8 from. I'm a 48-year-old homeschooling wife, mother of
five, and grandmother of [soon] six and all my life I have heard that
verse used to defend the belief that Christians should "make nice"; that
they should flee from any influence which exposes them to evil, ugliness,
sin, the wages of sin, the carnage created by sin, the attractiveness
of some types of sin. The result of this see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-speak-no-evil
attitude is a hardened sense of self-righteousness, an appalling lack
of compassion for those trapped in sin, and often a frightening inability
to recognize and discern *real* sinfulness when confronted with it. What
I hear you saying as you present your approach to Paul's words in Philippians
4:8 is radically different. You seem to be encouraging believers to be
fully engaged in their lives wherever they are, whomever they are with,
in whatever capacity they are called and in the midst of this gritty,
sometimes messy, fallen, stricken world, to be looking constantly, vigilantly
for the Word of God in the midst of us. I cannot tell you how exciting
and extraordinary this insight is. It reminds us that we serve and love
a God who is always seeking to communicate with His people, to be the
Light of the World, who will use whatever means at hand to reach as many
as have ears to hear. You seem to be recalling us to the old David and
Karen Mains idea of the God Hunt, where we are alive to every situation,
word, symbol, recollection and interaction with our heroic and glorious
God who is *always* here and always at work. Your approach brings excitement
and challenge and almost an electric arc of recognition when we see the
Lord's word. Disengaging means we sit and congratulate God on His good
taste in choosing us. Who has a greater impact and a more powerful testimony?
The person who is alive to the Lord and sees Him at work all around Him,
or the person who fears sullying him or herself with the muck of the world
and instead waits, tracts in hand, for sinners to find their way to them
in a clean environment?
I hesitated to read
the Harry Potter books for a long time because so many Christians feel
deeply that they are evil and a gate to the occult. But after reading
Chuck Colson's comments I decided to read the whole series and have not
only enjoyed them greatly, but have been quite moved by Harry Potter's
self-sacrificing nature, by his loyalty, his courage, his wit and intelligence.
With each novel I've seen many old stories brought to life (just an example,
isn't Harry seeing his father as the stag in the moonlight very similar
to the old Christian legend of St. Eustace and the stag?) Harry bears
the marks of the evil Voldemort (he is known by his scar!) but he received
the scar and lived through the encounter because of the love and sacrifice
of his parents. This kind of story telling is powerful and has such parallel
to the stories we Christians love so much that I am saddened that it is
fear which keeps our brothers and sisters from enjoying the beauty and
meaning. Of course I think it's important to discuss the use of mechanical
magic in the wizarding world with our children, but as we are bringing
them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord we should be discussing
those things anyway. I don't *want* my children's first exposure to these
ideas to occur after they're grown and out of my home. I read the books
aloud to my family and we talked about them all the time, speculated about
the meanings of names and sometimes figured out that characters weren't
entirely reliable based on clues in their names before they had ever done
anything suspicious. But isn't the muggle/wizard division similar to the
world/believer division as well? The intriguing thing to me in the wizarding
world is that every single person must make a choice of who they will
serve. What more fundamental life question could we face? And to those
who criticize the death of Harry's schoolmate -- the stakes are high and
to make the battle appear easy and the consequences minor is to betray
the memories of so many who who lost everything. Good *isn't* better than
evil because it's nicer!
Thank you so much
for your newsletters. I have been impressed with the issues you raise
and the call that you give to all of us to be faithful in all things.
I didn't discover your website until after I spent a year teaching in
a small Christian school and can give you a serious example of the impact
you have had in my life. When I was teaching high school English, I was
presenting my students each week with Latin and Greek roots to English
words in hopes that it would improve their vocabularies and their understanding
of the interrelatedness of language and thought and ideas. The day I presented
the Latin word "mater" and its derivatives, including "matrix", my 11th
and 12th grade students became very restive and suddenly little pockets
of conversation and speculation erupted all over the class. I was curious
about this uncharacteristic reaction until they said they had all gone
to see *The Matrix* at the local theatre over the weekend and had been
trying to puzzle out the meaning of the film. I, of course, out of respect
for our church's belief that no Christian should see an R-rated movie
had *not* seen *The Matrix* and had no basis for discussing this film
with the kids. To this day I repent of such a foolish restriction because
I lost the opportunity of opening my English class to an entire period
of discussing the meaning and parallels and witness of an amazing film
that I have since seen. That incident totally changed my perspective on
the necessity for me to be culturally awake and aware. You had a big part
in that and I thank you. God bless you for your ministry!
Very sincerely,
Kim Jeffery
Response:
I am humbled by your letter. Thank you, thank you. By the way, Philippians
4:8 has set the new tone of my life. At one time I focused more on what
was bad and evil rather than good. You have made my day -David
CAN
ENCOURAGE KIDS INTO WITCHCRAFT
Subject: Newsletter_30
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001
From: tim
God takes bad stuff
(inc. satan) all the time and uses it for something good / constructive.
Harry Potter CAN encourage young people into witchcraft etc. I know of
3 teenage girls into it already (one cast a spell on her hampster and
healed it). However, we need to be balanced. Shunning the film will do
no good... a less extreme approach is needed. We need to educate young
people that watching the film can turn one person onto witchcraft, or
be a source of harmless entertainment to another person. (personally,
i think the film looks naff, give me "the matrix" anyday!). I agree with
Jen. As a youthworker this film can be a valuable tool for teaching young
people kingdom values etc. However, in the wrong hands it can be used
to stir up an unhealthy interest in the occult. "Im right, im right! right?"
- chandler bing (hehe)
Posted by rubberbullets
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 123
|
Index
to all the comments Sep 13, 2001 to Mar 06, 2002
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 145 Mar
01-06, 2002
Go to page 144 Feb 18-28, 2002
Go to page 143 Feb 01-17, 2002
Go to page 142 Jan 25-31, 2002
Go to page 141 Jan18-24, 2002
Go to page 140 Jan 14-17, 2002
Go to page 139 Jan 13, 2002
Go to page 138 Jan 08-12, 2002
Go to page 137 Jan 06-07, 2002
Go to page 136 Jan 04-05, 2002
Go to page 135 Jan 01-03, 2002
Go to page 134 Dec 27-31, 2002
Go to page 133 Dec 21-26, 2001
Go to page 132 Dec 13-20, 2001
Go to page 131 Dec 06-12, 2001
Go to page 130 Dec
01-05, 2001
Go to page 129 Nov 28-30, 2001
Go to page 128 Nov 27, 2001
|
Go
to page 127 Nov 26, 2001
Go to page 126 Nov 20-25, 2001
Go to page 125 Nov 18-20, 2001
Go to page 124 Nov 15-18, 2001
Go to page 123 Nov 14-15, 2001
Go to page 122 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 121 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 120 Nov 08-12, 2001
Go to page 119 Nov 07, 2001
Go to page 118 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 117 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 116 Nov 1-5, 2001
Go to page 115 Oct 30-31, 2001
Go to page 114 Oct 23-29, 2001
Go to page 113 Oct 12-22, 2001
Go to page 112 Oct
01-11, 2001
Go to page 111 Sep 18-30, 2001
Go to page 110 Sep 13-17, 2001
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|