|
|
|
include("inserts/navigation_upper.htm"); ?>
|
.
.
with comments by David Bruce
|
| I
receive a lot of e-mail. I am not able to post all the mail. I have
included a good sampling, however. If the subject is the same I might
group the newer messages with similar older ones. Also, my response
may appear a few days after the original posting. I can't do HJ everyday.
You must include your "name" and e-mail address within your comment
if you want it posted, otherwise it will not be posted (there is a privacy
issue here and we respect that). I do, however, encourage you to give
your "name" and e-mail so others can respond to you personally.
|
|
E-mail and Comments:
|
|
This
page was last updated on November 29, 2001
|
|
KINKADE'S
FUNDAMENTAL DISCONNECTION FROM REALITY
Subject: Newsletter_27-Kinkade
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001
From: Lizzie
I came across your
(very intriguing) website while doing a web search on Thomas Kinkade --
I had just finished reading an article about him in this week's New Yorker
(a must read for any TK skeptics), and found myself at once fascinated
and repelled by his art work. My interest piqued, I typed in his name,
got something like 29,000 hits. To refine the search, I tried the word
"scam", and your site (amongst a very few others) popped up.( If there
is any good to be got from my encounter with this mediocre artist, it
is in finding the hollywoodjesus site!)
I had never heard
of TK, but his art seemed vaguely familiar, perhaps something I had seen
in passing in some mall somewhere. Frankly, his is the sort of art I almost
automatically dismiss as "Kitsch" on par with velvet Elvis painting. I
was shocked to discover how popular, and profitable, his art is and that
his company is publicly traded on the NYSE. Clearly, he is a kind of phenomenon
and I had dismissed him too lightly.
I don't really know
where to begin the list of the many things I find so disturbing about
the TK phenomenon, but since you and contributors to your site have covered
much that was on my list I will restrict myself to his basic lack of artistic
technique (an important point, as many people preface their criticism
by acknowledging of his "impressive talent" and "genius").
At first glance, his
subjects look well drawn, realistically rendered, and believably three-dimensional--what
one would expect from any art school graduate. However, where I had expected
to find a master craftsman very carefully painting in the sentimental
tradition, I found misaligned perspectives, awkward proportions, inexplicable
light sources, and strange juxtapositions of architecture and landscape.
His scenery has no relationship to geographical reality: it is a world
where shadows fall haphazardly; small cottages dwarf clock towers; large
gazebos are perched awkwardly on the edge of cliffs, in front of disproportionatly
small light houses; horses the size of dogs graze near trees just barely
larger than flower bushes; and babbling brooks tumble down steep hills
without suffering the effects of gravity. His churches are buried in deep
forests and hover at the edge of swamps, without paths, their front doors,
blocked by streams that in any remotely real geography would immediately
flood the buildings, and impossibly large manors are wedged, cottage-like,
into tiny lots crowded with strangely tall flowers (see the "Cotswold"
cottage/manor looming over a tiny bridge and a shoe-sized skiff in a painting
from the Lamplight Lane series).
The lack of human
life (commented on in your article) further contributes to the strangeness
of his world. I find it especially telling in the painting of the nature
churches, where there seems to be no way for any human to access the church
itself. One is cut off by dense forests, giant mountains, and rivers.
Where people are depicted they are awkward, stick-like and blurred: unspecific,
faceless figures, barely three dimensional and lacking the color, depth,
weight, movement, that he gives inanimate objects. His human figures look
especially doll-like and vague when placed near the carefully rendered
bricks and shining windows of his buildings (as in Town Square and his
Christmas paintings). In "It doesn't get any better than this" the fisherman
is sort of tacked onto an improbably angled log. There is no sense of
tension in the fisherman's body--how he would be balancing on a round
slanted object. His legs, which are straight in the painting, would be
bent at different angles and so would not appear to be the same length.
Professional artists spend years trying to capture the human body in just
such motion, and there are many ways of rendering depth that just aren't
at work here--there is no sense that this guy is a representation of anyone
real. Also the fisherman's' shadow is cast in a different direction than
the shadows of the trees, a basic sloppy mistake (on a sunny day everything
would project a shadow from the same source and would project in the same
direction at the same angle).
In almost all of his
paintings the parts do not fit together naturally, as they would in three
dimensional reality, but seem to come from different places and to be
forced together in the scene: buildings stand firmly on river beds, stable
light sources shift all over, otherwise immutable horizon lines disappear,
historical eras collide and compete, dark colors appear where bright ones
would naturally and vice versa. This general mismatching is patched over
with the stippled points of light and deliberately brilliant colors to
create an artificially uniform effect.
So, what is the point
of all this technical nit-picking? I think TK's obliviousness to the basic
physics governing the material world is related to your overarching thesis
that his paintings advocate a retreat from reality. Just as he depicts
a lack of involvement with the world, his painting evidences a profound
disregard for world on the most fundamental level (how the sun shines,
how trees grow, how the human body moves). His preference is always for
the kind of magical effect one associates with depictions of misty fairy-lands.
Lizzie
|
|
LA
VITA E BELLA
Subject: Life_Is_Beautiful
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001
From: Jan
this is deffinetly
the best movie ever about the power of love in a world full of madness
give this movie to all the world leathersand tere won't be a war annymore!
|
|
THIS
IS THE BEST MOVIE
Subject: American_History_X
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001
From: Brooke
I found that this
movie was very educational and interesting. It is true in many ways. I
was wondering if "Hate is baggage, Life's to short to be pissed off all
the time" is a quote from the end of the movie. I watched it 3 times and
that's what I thought I heard him say, but when I look it up on the internet
I find nothing about him saying that. If anybody knows please e-mail me
at little_miss03@hotmail.com.
Thanks. This is the best movie.
|
|
ENJOYED
Subject: God the Devil and Bob
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001
From: Taraterm
I enjoyed the show
very much- and did not find it all offensive. I think you can be a good
Christian and still have a sense of humour. I wish the religious right
would go after other programming far more dangerous and idiotic to the
minds of the population.
|
|
ABOUT
THE 100 LIST
Subject: Newsletter_25
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001
From: Pastor Eric L. Eickhoff beeickh@ruraltel.net
Sir: I agree that
many of the movies that you have listed on the 100 faith affirming list
do have a positive faith message(10 commandments, chariot of fire, etc),
many more have a most confusion way of doing that(matrix, exorcist, aliens,
traffic). Also many of those films have a faith that is unrecognizable
to the vast majority of people who name Christ as lord and savior. Also
many of those films have subject matters that would immediately eliminate
them from a 'faithful' persons watching list.
In HIS Service
Pastor Eric L. Eickhoff
Portis Grace Brethren Church
PO Box 6 Portis, Kansas 67474
785.346.2085 beeickh@ruraltel.net
|
|
HOLLY
WOOD AND JESUS
Subject: Hollywood
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001
From: Dennis
Holy Mackerel there
Andy! I had no idea of the links holly and wood had to Jesus. Very interesting.
dennis
|
|
BLUE
LETTER
Subject: blue letter Mithras
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001
From: "shohreh jandaghian"
Dear sir, I've already
sent you an email, asking you about some information considering "mithraism
in hollywood". I read your article 'The incredible mithras myth' which
is very interesting. I'm a filmmaker living in paris and preparing a documentary
about "mithra". I'd like to know more about you and your activities considering
mithra and also I'd like to know if there is already a movie produced
about "mithraism" in hollywood. I'd appereciate if you let me know about
it. Please receive my best regards from paris;
sincerely, shohreh Jandaghian
|
|
CHRISTIANITY/TOLKIEN
Subject: Lord of the Rings
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001
From: Kate
While looking for
Tolkien information, I came across your site and was intrigued. Your insights
are interesting, but I think there may be more to it. I understand that
many of Tolkien's plots and characters are drawn from archetypes of Norse
and Celtic legends pre-dating or non-related to plots and characters from
the Christian Bible. Something you may want to look into is that many
of the plots and characters of the Christian bible are drawn from archetypes
much older than christianity. For example, the "death and resurrection"
archetype can be found in the ancient Egyptian legend of Osiris and other
eastern religions.
Thanks, Kate
|
|
JESUS
-INTERNATIONAL VERSION
Subject: JesusMiniSeries
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001
From: Ron D'Antonio
I emailed Lions Gate
Films about the release date of the International version of "Jesus".Their
excuse now is that they never planned to release the international version
on DVD. I was told several times it was on the list and coming in 2001
and then Easter 2002. I wish we could contact the director and have him
find out what's what. I'm starting to get ticked off with this company
and I really want the International version.
Ron D'Antonio
|
|
KEEPING
OUR HEARTS ON STRAIGHT DOWN SOUTH!
Subject: Cool_Churches_Newsletter_26
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001
From: Wendy Pace Columbia, SC
Hey! I just read your
article about "The R-rated Problem" and I totally relate! I grew up in
a Southern Baptist household, a minister's daughter no less, and at 18
left it all behind. I saw too much hypocrisy, un-warrented criticism,
judgement, etc., and I wanted no part of it. Thanks to God's grace, 14
years later I am back in His family, back in the South, and involved with
some of the coolest people I could ever ask to meet. My church is called
Tommy's Interactive. We meet at a coffee house in Columbia SC on Sunday's
at 12:30 where we sing praise and worship songs with a live band, have
actual DISCUSSIONS about the scriptures, use movies and music to demonstrate
God's word as relevent and applicable to all our lives, and have coffee
and snacks to boot! Our attendance during the school year reaches 80+
(capacity) and the age range goes from 3-60 (mostly in the college age,
though). Many of us share my story, rejecting our parents' "religion",
only to have God reveal our misconceptions and confusion and show us the
truly AWESOME life that He wants for us. I could write so much more, but
I just wanted to give a shout out for our crew down here. About our name,
it comes from doubting Thomas, who asked for proof - we encourage people
to come and ask questions, challenge us to "give proof for the hope that
is in us" (to paraphrase).
Keep up the good work,
God Bless you and your ministry,
Wendy Pace Columbia, SC
|
|
BAND
OF BROTHERS
Subject: HBO's Band of Brothers
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001
From: Darrell
Dear David: I have
been looking on your web site for a review or some commentary regarding
the HBO miniseries Band of Brothers; however, I have not found anything
to date. I hope you are intending to have the miniseries reviewed, but
more importantly, I believe your readers need to know about this incredibly
well done WWII miniseries.
I believe that the
entire series will encompass 11 separate episodes, of which the first
5 have aired to date. Although each new episode premiers on Sunday nights,
they are rerun on a regular basis throughout the week.
Certainly you are
familiar with the show; but if you are not, the miniseries is produced
by Stephen Spielberg and Tom Hanks (with Hanks also directing). It is
filmed in a very similar fashion to "Saving Private Ryan" (with washed
out color, lots of jittery camera shots especially during battle scenes,
and other touches). It does not have as much of the graphic violence as
SPR, but it is still pretty realistic.
The plot follows the
lives of Easy Company of the 506th Airborne Division of the Army from
D-Day through the end of the war. The main character is Richard Winters
(who starts out as a Lieutenant and has thus far been promoted to Captain)
Although the show does not dwell on it, Cap. Winters is a Christian, who
is deeply concerned about the safety of his men, longs for a swift end
to the war, but is always going beyond the call of duty in battle, in
both a very honorable and human way. All the characters seem to possess
very real and human qualities of fear, pain, anger, courage, grief, and
humor.
It is an excellent
miniseries that I have been telling my friend to watch, and I would encourage
you and your readers to watch as well.
Darrell
|
|
GOD
SPEAKS THROUGH HER
Subject: Dyan_Cannon
From Jill M.
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001
Dyan Cannon is just
a wonderful person! I go to the Gods Party Bible Studies, and I just love
it! Dyan does a great job with her messages that God gives and speaks
through her.
God Bless ! Jill
|
|
MYTH
AND MYTHRAS
Subject: myth and mythras
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001
From: cedar
Hi there I tell you
true, on religions I am confused, though amazingly enough about, God I
am not :)
I don't understand
any purposes of human sacrifices, it all seems repugant and abhorrant....
whether they be the rites of Molech, this religion or that down through
time, and even to even of Jesus on a cross. I don't understand animal
sacrifice, let alone human sacrifice, and I don't know why mammel life
is considered more so desirable for the task over plant life. The whole
concept of LIFE sacrifice period gives me the creeps!!!
I have nothing against
the words attributed to Jesus (or coming from God's Spirit through out
human history) The problems I DO however have is ANY religion that professes
to be THE WAY OR BE DOOMED (damned). "Believe this way", aka "BELIEVE
OUR WAY"-- "MY WAY" or burn in hte lake of fire for eternity. This to
me is mind control, a cult mentality if you will..... and plays on CONTROL
of believers and of FEAR. BUT contrary to all of this, is a God of Whom
I understand is LOVE.
I can't ascribe to
alot of Paul's teachings, his predjuce against women is most apparent,
by one who claims to be so enlightened. He even "threatens" his followers
with heresay, if one disputes his authority on these matters. Peter too
ascribes to the same predjuces of women. Between the two of these, they
have created hell on earth for many a woman for the last 2000 yrs, all
in the name of their god! If God gave a woman a gift to speak, be a prophet,
etc...who was this Paul (Saul) to say, even command otherwise! grrrrr
My feelings are that
in ANY religon, one must use a God given discernement to pick and choose,
of what one believes and knows to be true (inside) and what one may and
should discard as a writer's personal predjuces and tactics. On Mythras,
I sorta ascribe and agree with everyone saying that the bull is the age
of Taurus...and some (symbolic or literal)"god" was the slayer of that
age and of those times, as well as the bringer of new ones to come. I
liked the "seawitch" review alot.
I humbly request
my e-mail addy not be posted thankyou very much I may not agree with all
or most of your views...but it is good we all can discuss them. Remember
no one here is an authority on any of these matters,as it is all specualtion
from any of us. But we know what we know what we know....lol
|
ABOUT
MEN IN BLACK
Subject: Men In Black
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001
From: Cathy
My daughter first
introduced me to Men in Black and the spiritual insights were so blatant
to me that I've shared them several times but have found no other person
who could see the spiritual until I told them about it.
Think of it -- Men
in Black -- Think Johnny Cash after his conversion -- he began to wear
black -- think of priests and nuns who wear black -- Anyway these Men
in Black are really spiritual people. They see what average people do
not see. They see the warfare between the aliens (demons) and others whose
lives they influence.
BUT, the weapons of
our warfare are not carnal (nor are the weapons the Men in Black use regular
earthly weapons) but they are mighty through God to the pulling down of
strongholds.
Sometimes people become
aware that something has taken place but it wears off after the incident
as if some Man in Black has taken away their memory of the event through
his special flasher. Then they go about their lives oblivious to the spiritual
warfare surrounding them.
Even at the end when
we realize the cat is wearing a universe around her neck and the spiritual
beings recognize that ours is but a small world within a larger universe.
The demons come disguised
also -- Some humans think they are just other humans but they are not.
Anyway -- what do you think of my analogy? Thanks for the response.
God bless you in your ministry Cathy Bayert
Response:
Sure. I like it. Why not! -David
|
|
WHY
WAS IT REMOVED?
Subject: Review Removed: Titanic
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001
From: Angela
To whom it may concern:
I was very disappointed to see that you removed your spiritual review
of "Titanic". I found your site and was thrilled, considering that I have
to write a paper for my Films class on this particular movie. And, being
a Christian, I thought it would be a good idea to research the spiritual
emphasis on the film...I was dismayed to see that you removed your thoughts.
In Christ, Angela
Response:
The person who wrote the original review decided to throw rocks at me.
-David
|
|
REVIEW?
Subject: Meggido
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001
From: Dave
I can`t fing the film
Megiddo on your site . why is this?
thanks Dave
Response:
They have not sent me a review copy. -David
|
|
FORREST
GUMP?
Subject: Forrest Gump?
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001
From: Sean N.
I coldnt find anything
about forrest gump on your site. What, if any, is the meaning behind that
film. I would like religious or sociological meaning behind the film if
you have one.
Thanks! Sean N.
Response:
I have not reviewed this film. Sorry -David
|
|
INTERNATIONAL
VERSION OF JESUS
Subject: Jesus Mini Series
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001
From: DANTON
I have been informed
by Mr. Scott Hayman of Lions Gate Films that there are no plans to issue
the International version of "Jesus "on DVD. As I told you I was told
that it was due out this year,now they've done an about face. I guess
your readers haven't written in to request this release. Too bad.
|
|
MISTAKEN
QUOTE
Subject: Jurassic_Park_III
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001
From: Sara Lackey
I believe the saying
is "the book is always better than the movie," which has always been true
in my experience.
-- Sara Lackey lackeysr@jmu.edu
|
|
"KINKADE"
PROBLEM
Subject: "kinkade" problem Newsletter_27-Kinkade
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001
From: Nathan Landis
Dear Mr. Bruce, It
saddens me that there are so many Christians out there today that think
movies have to always have conflict, or totally be worldly to be "christ"
like. I read an article in a denominational magazine a few months ago
that listed the 5 best secular films that "displayed" christian values.
On that list was "American Beauty."
Let me tell you, I
watched it and found the "christian values" in it, but to find it I had
to sit through so many scenes of just distasteful trash. Both adults slept
with partners other then their spouse, the father used drugs, and on top
of that he almost slept with his daughter's best friend.
I agree with you that
christian movies right now are not dealing with alot of reality, but I
caution people like yourself into trying to find "christian" values in
alot of Hollywood films. After reading many of your reviews
I feel that your trying
to add spirituality to films that just don't have it. Just because a film
"teaches" us about the nature of sin, doesn't mean that it is worth watching,
much less paying to see. I doubt Jesus would sit down to be entertained
by "snatch" or other such movies, just because they teach realities that
are written in the Bible. I feel that this "christianizing" of hollywood
films is really a wolf in sheep's clothing. I wish critics like yourself
would write reviews about hollywood films that WOULD be worth watching.
I came along a great
movie a month ago that was one of those odd gems hollywood puts out now
and then. You may have heard of it. It was called "The Body" and it starred
Antonio Banderes. This movie had conflict, it was very interesting, and
it had a great underlining message.
This is the kind of
films I think you should be writing about, and the Christian film industry
should be making. It's not some end times thriller, or a "preachy" movie,
but it was interesting and was definitely worth watching.
Sincerely, Nathan Landis
|
|
EXTREME
DAYS
Subject: Extreme Days
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001
From: "Sara Cobb"
Dear David, I want
to tell you how much I like hollywoodjesus.com! It is a great site. The
reviews are always interesting and insightful. I appreciate how you and
your staff always seem to look for the positive lessons that movies can
teach us.
I would also like
to recommend that you watch and review the new film Extreme Days. I saw
it this weekend with a bunch of college aged friends and we all really
enjoyed it. The film godly values and a god honoring story without being
preachy. I would be interested to read your review.
Thanks and keep up
the good work!
Blessings, Sara J. Cobb
|
|
INTERFAITH
PRAYER SERVICE
Subject: Sept 23
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001
From: "pat tracey"
Hi, David! Your website
has been very helpful to me, especially as a teacher; great work! You
never fail to give me another one or two or three or more perspectives
on popular films. Have sent a lot of my friends to the site.
Wonder if you can
do me a favor? Do you know of any source where I can obtain a video of
the Interfaith Prayer Service at Yankee Stadium on Sept 23, 2001?
Thank you! Pat
Response:
Sorry, I know of no source. -David
|
|
|
You
are on Comments page 112
|
Index
to all the comments Sep 13, 2001 to Mar 06, 2002
|
For
more recent comments click here
Go to page 145 Mar
01-06, 2002
Go to page 144 Feb 18-28, 2002
Go to page 143 Feb 01-17, 2002
Go to page 142 Jan 25-31, 2002
Go to page 141 Jan18-24, 2002
Go to page 140 Jan 14-17, 2002
Go to page 139 Jan 13, 2002
Go to page 138 Jan 08-12, 2002
Go to page 137 Jan 06-07, 2002
Go to page 136 Jan 04-05, 2002
Go to page 135 Jan 01-03, 2002
Go to page 134 Dec 27-31, 2002
Go to page 133 Dec 21-26, 2001
Go to page 132 Dec 13-20, 2001
Go to page 131 Dec 06-12, 2001
Go to page 130 Dec
01-05, 2001
Go to page 129 Nov 28-30, 2001
Go to page 128 Nov 27, 2001
|
Go
to page 127 Nov 26, 2001
Go to page 126 Nov 20-25, 2001
Go to page 125 Nov 18-20, 2001
Go to page 124 Nov 15-18, 2001
Go to page 123 Nov 14-15, 2001
Go to page 122 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 121 Nov 13, 2001
Go to page 120 Nov 08-12, 2001
Go to page 119 Nov 07, 2001
Go to page 118 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 117 Nov 06, 2001
Go to page 116 Nov 1-5, 2001
Go to page 115 Oct 30-31, 2001
Go to page 114 Oct 23-29, 2001
Go to page 113 Oct 12-22, 2001
Go to page 112 Oct
01-11, 2001
Go to page 111 Sep 18-30, 2001
Go to page 110 Sep 13-17, 2001
For earlier comments click here
|
|
Your
Comments.
Post your thoughts for all to read.
Please include your "name." I will not post your e-mail
address unless you want me to.
CLICK HERE
Comments_E-mail
Your
Private Comments.
I will not post these comments. What are your personal
thoughts? I also welcome your spiritual concerns and prayer needs.
I will correspond with you, usually within two weeks.
CLICK HERE
Private_Comments_E-mail
Hollywood
Jesus News Letter
Receive the Hollywood Jesus Newsletter FREE.
Sign up here
|
|
| |
|
|