The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
—1. Overview
—2. Reviews and Blogs
—3. Cast and Crew
—4. Photo Pages
—5. Trailers, Clips, DVDs, Books, Soundtrack
—6. Posters
—7. Production Notes (pdf)
—8. Spiritual Connections
—9. Presentation Downloads
Well, let’s see here. Huge battle scene. Check. Fanciful creatures; some wondrous and beautiful, some hideous and grotesque. Check. A plucky band of heroes willing to stand for what’s good and right no matter the cost. Check. Wise, benevolent, self-sacrificing, powerful character representing all that is good. Check. Cunning, malicious, dark, brutal character representing all that is evil. Check. Grandiose setting with scenic back-drops. Check. Yup, looks like The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe has all the necessary elements to be the next epic, fantasy/adventure...except for the fact that it’s pretty much missing the epic feel one would expect from such a film. It lacks the intensity and emotional weight of a true epic and instead comes off as a sort of “fantasy/adventure lite�. In fact, “lite� is the word that I think best describes this movie. This isn’t to say that Narnia is a bad film, because it isn’t. In fact, it’s a good, faithful adaptation of C.S. Lewis’ beloved book, but it’s a difficult film to review. Terrible movies are easy to review, as are great movies, because it’s so easy to find words to describe the experience. Average movies, however, are much tougher to review because it’s hard to properly present what one might experience upon viewing. Narnia is definitely an average movie – not terrible, but not great – and hence, it’s hard film to pin down in a review such as this.
Let me begin by saying that Liam Neeson just doesn’t seem to me like the right choice for Aslan. After all, Aslan is perhaps the most important character in this story, and the most crucial to get right, especially to appease fans of the book. However, it felt like he was in Qui Gon mode (the Jedi Master that trained Obi Wan in Star Wars Episode I) while recording his lines, which unfortunately made Aslan seem a bit tame. He definitely nails the compassion, love and wisdom of Aslan, but as for the ferocity and wildness of the famed lion, well, those elements were lacking. Both the book and film state that Aslan is not a tame lion, but he certainly seemed that way on screen. I can’t help but think that James Earl Jones would have been the perfect voice for Aslan, but seeing as he has already voiced a previous lion, that obviously wasn’t a choice. The same goes for Jeremy Irons, who I also think would have made an excellent choice. However, Neeson does do a competent job in bringing Aslan to life, and the special effects for the lion itself are top notch, so although he seemed tame, he was also still quite impressive when seen on the big screen.
The stand out performance in this film probably belongs to Tilda Swinton as the White Witch. She fully embodies this character and perfectly portrays her arrogance, grace, cruelty and malevolence. Plus, she was the only one that I really believed knew how to handle a sword. I know that Peter and Edmund are just kids, but to see them engage in a battle wildly swinging their swords about like...well like children, I was kind of surprised they weren’t instantly killed by the witch’s battle-hardened and trained creatures. Of the four Pevensie children, I thought Georgie Henley, the actress who played Lucy, turned in the best performance. The other actors did decent jobs, but for the most part, I thought their acting was a bit stiff (insert British joke here). Competent is perhaps the best word I can use to describe the performances over all. The Beavers were perhaps the most enjoyable to watch, while Mr. Tumnus unfortunately felt a bit shallow. Again, you won’t be seeing any Oscar material in this lot.
The special effects for Narnia in some places are quite good, and in a very few places, seemed to lack polish. Perhaps with finishing the DVD release of a certain other fantasy adventure series, working on an upcoming, epic monster film with a certain hairy ape, and supervising the effects for this film, WETA found themselves a bit overworked and therefore unable to give their full attention to everything. Still, Narnia comes to life on the big screen in an impressive way. Much of what is seen will delight fans of the book because set pieces so closely matches what one would imagine while reading. The creature effects for the most part are also quite good, though I’d have to agree with Lewis when he expressed concerns about anthropomorphized creatures talking on the big screen. Such a thing works well in the mind of the reader, but some how it doesn’t translate as well onto the big screen for people to see. There were also a couple points where I thought to myself “how did that guy fit into that animal-slash-monster costume, and more importantly, how can he run around like that in it?�, but those moments were few and far between.
Now, for the music. I really don’t know what to say. It was so different from what I expected that I kept alternating from enjoying it and hating it. The score has some elements that made it seem strangely contemporary for such a timeless tale, and at times it was almost jarring how it contrasted with what was on the screen. At other times it blended so well with what was going on that I didn’t even notice it was there, and still other moments the music didn’t lend the emotional punch to a scene that it should have despite its best efforts. In the end, I’m still not sure what to think of the movie score, except to say it gets the job done.
Before I go any further, let me take a moment and lay to rest any fears fans may have of certain elements being lost from page to screen. All the allegorical elements that fans desperately wanted to make sure would be included in the film are there, and not watered down in the least. The scene at the stone table is pretty much exactly what it should be, although it wasn’t quite as dark as I imagined it. Again, “lite� would be a good word to describe it. All those themes of redemption, love, sacrifice and forgiveness are displayed in the movie without compromise, but I have to wonder whether or not someone who isn’t familiar with the book or the Bible would catch them. Sure they may seem familiar to Christians, they already know the story, but for others these themes may not be quite as obvious, and the whole “gospel message� contained in this story will likely have to be explained to the unfamiliar. Still, as I said, this is a very faithful adaptation of the book, and the rumors of things being changed apparently were either unfounded or listened to and influenced some of the editing. There were some early concerns over a rumored change that switched a reference to the Emperor Over the Sea to the Four Winds, but that wasn’t any where to be seen in this cut of the film. However, whether or not the message of this movie will it the life-changing, culture-changing phenomenon many are hoping for seems unlikely.
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is a good movie, but something was lost in its translation from book to screen. While I still enjoy the Narnia stories as an adult reader, as an adult at the movies I wasn’t nearly as entertained. But then again, maybe I wasn’t supposed to be. This movie seems to be squarely aimed at the 8-12 year-old crowd. Anyone in that age group will find this film to be an awesome experience. Christians will be happy to know that their beloved classic hasn’t been tampered with, and in that regard I think they’ll also love this film. People who haven’t read the book may find the movie to be enjoyable and fun, but not anything special. Fans of fantasy/adventure films will be sorely disappointed by the “lite-ness� of this journey to Narnia, and may have a hard time taking it seriously. In the end, Narnia is a good film that does a competent job of adapting a beloved story, but I don’t think it will meet some people’s expectations and certainly doesn’t even begin to compare to the scale or grandeur of a certain other fantasy trilogy that was written by a contemporary of C.S. Lewis’. Enjoy the journey through the wardrobe while you can, because I have a feeling that it will not reign at the box office for long when another King vies for that throne the following weekend. When that happens, this film will quickly be pushed from the forefront of most people’s consciousness, only to be rediscovered when it returns on DVD.
7 Comments:
When leaving the theatre today, I was looking for the right words to describe my "disappointment," and I think you stated them exactly as I was thinking them.
In fact, I think the allegory of the Christ-story is so strong, I sometimes forgot about the actual film plot and got drawn out of the action. While it fits, I think the allegory went to the extreme when Aslan says "It is finished," verbatim quoting Scripture here.
On the whole it was a good movie, but nothing overly spectacular. I was, for the most part, happy with the music, special effects, the characters, the setting, but not THRILLED with them (in fact, Aslan looked incredibly CGI'ed; he looked like a computer image, not that real, which, at times, took me out of the movie). Anyway, thanks for your review. You hit the nail on the head here.
I agree with your review that Tilda Swinton put in the best performance of all the actors. I disagree, though, with your disappointment in how Peter and Edmund fought. I wouldn't expect two young, innexperienced boys to suddenly become master swordsmen. The only reason they could perform well at all was due to the Narnia magic. I thought that it appeared more realistic in that sense - being innexperience yet "guided" if you will.
Overall, I was enthralled with the movie. My major disappoinment came in that although the film took the time it needed to develop the characters and the depth of the story in the early part of the movie, the last part of the movie (the most crucial to the story) seemed a bit rushed.
Likewise, I think what was missing from the film were the little elements along the way - many of which contained theological lessons - which were trimmed off for the sake of time.
Overall, I loved it more than I didn't.
P.S. How would Sean Connery have been as the voice of Aslan?
I have never heard of these books. I would not have seen the movie if my Pastor had not commented on it last Sunday. I went into the theater hoping that this was something we could use in our faith battles with the secular world. Hoping I could shout, "praise the Lord" when it was over.
I found the movie very slow and dull. Though I enjoyed the graphics and Lucy, the rest was a let down. Perhaps I was looking for too much from this film. The biggest problem in the 21st century is that Christianity is becoming folklore, this film didn't help. It may even push us Christians closer to being labled as “Fairy tale followers.� You bring Father Christmas into the same story as our Lord, you may as well bring in the Tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny. Then when you try to explain that Jesus is real but the rest are not. Why will they want to differentiate them?
Maybe I’m just bummed and in a bad mood. All that money spent, all the talk at church, all those possibilities of conversation about the Lord. Gone. Logged as just another silly fairy tail. I pray the book had better appeal. This movie will not draw anyone closer to the truth.
Yo-
Hey man, I think your review really represents about how I felt about this film. It totally WAS epic lite.
I personally, though, believe that the four children were almost perfectly cast. I believed each of them, with Lucy standing out as the best performance in my mind (even above Tilda Swenton's...).
The trouble with this film, I thought, really was the Aslan character. I agree with the anonymous poster who felt Aslan looked totally computerized. I don't know how else they could have done Him, but I did feel like He was a computer image.
Also, in the book series...Aslan is sometimes big and sometimes small. He is sometimes violent and untamed, other times loving...He simply isn't given enough "screen time" to bring these characteristics out.
I would recommend this film, and maybe even see it again...but "epic lite" is maybe a new genre created right here by this film and in your review!!!
Grace and Peace,
ED
Love the story...grew up on it, and surprisingly I was a non-believer as a child in an atheist family. I never understood this story was an allegory of the Christian story.
The movie would have been much better if there were time for characterization. So much time was spent, and well spent on special effects, that we don't have time to come to know and love the characters. Instead of dialogue between characters explaining this story, we have great sweeping scenes.
If the story had been an hour longer, with all that time being devoted to interplay between characters, this would have been a great movie. Now it is only good.
I would have loved to have gotten to know the fox, and some of the other animals better, and as for Aslan, there just isn't enough time spent with him.
I first read this as a kid and have had a strange fetish for Turkish Delight ever since.
It did feel a bit studio-ish though, when it could have been filmed in the grandness of the actual outdoors.
Then again it is all inside a wardrobe...
I'm disappointed they didn't muzzle Aslan, but at least we got to see the kill, since it's missed out in the books.
I was struck more with the imagery of winter in this movie which really brought out the ancient celebrations of Winter vs Summer, as in Christmas being the time of the Solstice when Winter is at it's peak. The sun seems dead, but then rises again, bringing new life...
The return of Father Christmas helps this as well.
YO, "Epic Lite" - what a great term to have coined - hope it catches on as it is very descriptive. Anyway, enjoyed the movie - but did not have the benefit of having read the series of books (not sure if I would have enjoyed the film more or less if I had read the books?).
Post a Comment
<< Home