Friday, August 26, 2005

40 Year Old Virgin

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film pdf


Click to enlargeOk, I went to see 40 Year Old Virgin (40YOV) tonight. First chance I had. I was really looking forward to it because I had heard it was number one in the box office last weekend. I had also heard that it had a real sweet message. My only hesitancy was that I had also heard it was a bit raunchy with some profanity. But I had heard the same about Wedding Crashers and I really loved Wedding Crashers.

So I know I am going to probably get a lot of hate e-mails on this one (ppl that like reviews generally don’t send e-mails J). But I thought, and I may be the only Reviewer to take this stance, that it was one of the worse movies I have seen this year. Especially in light of all the other great movies out this Summer.

But hear me out before you start telling me what a jerk I am and that all the other Reviewers loved the film. You may think I hated it because it was full of profanity and took stereotypes way beyond any reasonable imagination? Not really. I had heard much worse things about Wedding Crashers, that it was really raunchy – and I loved Wedding Crashers – one of the funniest movies I have seen this year. I am generally not bothered by profanity, nudity, or any of the other common reasons for a “R� rating – though I am not a big blood and gore fan. No, it was something else.

The Wedding Crashers had storyline that was supported by the profanity and sexual scenes. There was a reason for this in the film. There were various themes in it that I felt were well worth dealing with the raunchiness. But 40 YOV was a totally different film. I laughed a lot in both of the movies, but with 40YOV I realized about halfway through the flick that I was becoming extremely aggravated – don’t know quite how to explain it, but it was like I felt like punching something. It was sort of how I felt after 9/11.

Yes, the profanity was sharp, but it was really taken a little too far and while it is common use within films to use stereotypes and exaggeration to make it easier for the audience to understand the nature of the characters, this film goes way too far. According to this film every man is sex crazed maniac, unless you happen to be an inept nerd – and even then, you aren’t constantly “scoring� unless you are just unlucky. And nearly every woman is a stupid, drunken, whore. Even the “nice� girl has a mouth like a drunken sailor when she thinks she’s on the phone with a telemarketer. I think this is part of why I was getting aggravated.

While Wedding Crashers used sexual liaisons as a background for the storyline and strategically placed profanity to emphasize feelings, 40 YOV did just the opposite and I felt that the Director had decided to create as “shocking� a film as they could and then decided to fit some type of storyline after the fact. There is a trend in recent movies to create down and dirty “R� rated movies, but then incorporate a viable Message in the Movie with some decent moralistic value. Example is Wedding Crashers; where Owen Wilson began to realize that he and his buddy’s hobby of crashing weddings to get great food and “score� one-night stands – and then the relationship between the two friends themselves. I have no problem with this, but I think 40YOV missed the mark.

I will admit at this point that I knew about the Message at the end of the 40 YOV, but I never made it. I tried really hard to hang in there to get to the Message, but I couldn’t – at one point I got so aggravated and sick of the constantly bashing, and admittedly I found myself laughing and then thinking how terrible it was that I was laughing at the scene – that I finally just got up and walked out of the movie (which if you know me takes quite a bit – after all – I paid money and hate to throw it away).

But from talking with other Reviewers who were able to suffer through the film to the final line, even the Message is somewhat tainted because the 40 Year Old Virgin was a virgin out of a series of unfortunate events and not because of his desire to stay pure all those years – instead it was because he was an inept nerd who wanted to “score�, but just couldn’t. I will have to admit that the fact that Andy, played by Steve Carrell, did not want to go along with his new buddies in most of their women hunting events had some redeeming value – but even in this, it was because he was just afraid it would be another disastrous outing for him.

I had stated in my review of the Wedding Crashers that “if you can wade through some of the more offensive moments (which are, in the case of this movie, necessary to the film’s story), then this is a must see.� Unfortunately, I can not say the same about 40 Year Old Virgin. It had little value, if any, and unless you enjoy being constantly bombarded with the gross devaluation of both men and women, and overly foul language just for the sake of trying to shock the audience, this movie is a definite NOT see. It goes to the bottom of my 2005 list. There are so many other good movies out this Summer – see one of them, or even re-see a good movie you have already seen – but do not waste your time on this flick.

Continue:
—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film pdf

7 Comments:

Reviews by Matthew Hill said...

Papabear:

Hey, brother. I appreciate your take on this movie, though I disagree. It seems to me that *Virgin* and *Wedding Crashers* are about even when it comes to stereotypes, profanity, etc., being used just for shock vs. to serve the story. I mean, the grandmother with the dirty mouth in *Crashers*? That didn't serve the story, it was just hey-look-at-the-old-lady-swearing shtick. And there's plenty of that type of thing in *both* movies. So for me, I was able to dig out the gold in the gutters of both.

Your point about Andy being a virgin not by choice, but by circumstance, is well-taken, though. You're right. However, it wasn't necessarily his choosing to be a virgin that made the biggest impact on me. It was the juxtaposition of his uncomplicated life with the complicated lives of his buddies. I don't think his friends were portrayed as "sex crazed maniacs," but as guys who all had different issues, complications, all revolving around women and sex. Andy, in contrast, didn't have those issues until sex, the pursuit of sex, the girlfriend, etc., came into the picture. To me, this is the saving grace of the movie: that sex before marriage is portrayed as complicated, but that sex within marriage (at the end of the film) is portrayed as something to sing, dance, and frolic in a field about.

Anyway, there's my buck-fifty. Thanks for yours!

8:00 AM  
Reviews by PapaBear said...

Dear Brother in spirit and soul -- thank you for your kind words. You bring up many good points. Some of which I can not find a reasonable counter agrument for. In retrospect I should have realized that the movie wasn't the type I normally go to (slight variations on the way the theme is portrayed between this movie and way portrayed in Wedding Crashers) along with the fact that I was pretty tired that night, probably influenced my view and may have contributed to my continuing feeling of irritation with the film. I just felt, unlike wedding crashers, that the movie was a "put down" on both men and women. Again, not my type of movie.

I can appreciate your point that "sex before marriage is portrayed as complicated, but that sex within marriage is portrayed as something to sing, dance, and frolic in a field about." I believe that you are correct in this Message alone may have made the movie worth it in the long run. I try very hard to avoid being judgemental on any film, and possibly, through a combination of tired and picking a movie not normally to my liking -- I was harsh and trashed the film to quickly. For me, I would not enjoy the film, but for others, it may be worth the investment of time and money. Thanks again Brother for the great discussion -- I LOVE it :-)

9:28 AM  
Anonymous said...

I'll admit the stereotyping of the virgin was quite disheartening, but truly the rest of the characters aren't cliche and stereotyped ... they're actually shown as complicated people with outer masks like many of us.

No offense, but I don't think I would've even written a review if you don't stay for the whole film ... sometimes just one line of dialogue or scene can turn an appreciation of a movie or change earlier perspectives. I respect your right/decision to walk out ... it's not fun to continually aggrivate oneself if that's how you were feeling.

I definitely enjoy your reviews all around though!

-- Benn

1:39 PM  
Reviews by PapaBear said...

Benn, thanks for you comments. I was very hesitant about posting this review for the exact reason you stated -- I didn't finish it. But after some discussions we felt it provided a differing viewpoint to my brethern Matthew Hill -- whick as I stated in an above comment -- provided some really good arguments for seeing the movie. This was one of the instances where you just say "oh, well, go with it..." and realize you may take a beating for it. I think the main item to get out of my Review was that, at least for me and I would imagine a few others, sometimes it is just too much to wade through to get to the real Message of the Movie. I guess my biggest complaint, or one of the things that maybe aggravated me (enough to make me leave) was that the concept of the movie presented such a great opportunity to provide a great social discussion -- and still be extremely funny -- but so much other "stuff" was dumped on it that I felt the Message was buried. Again, I appreicate your comments and I can guarantee you will not find me leaving a movie in the future -- just need to pick my movies a little better is all. On the upside, I am glad you enjoy my other Reviews -- I try to get to the heart of the film the best I know. I believe every Director, Author, Musician, Poet, etc. is trying to tell us something -- I just try to find out what that "something" is and relay it to the Readers. :-)

2:04 PM  
Anonymous said...

Fair enough and great points ... looking forward to more reviews!

-- Benn

2:25 PM  
lennyingals09443833 said...

i thought your blog was cool and i think you may like this cool Website. now just Click Here

1:03 AM  
Anonymous said...

I just saw this movie and loved it. I put if off for a while because I thought it would be just a dumb sex comedy, but instead I was very struck by how real and...sweet(?) the story was.
I don't see Keener's character as being some stereotypical "nice girl." That would be boring and sad. She's a woman: decent and real and flawed. That alone is such an amazing feat in a comedy these days.

7:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home