Final Destination 3
—2. Cast and Crew
—3. Photo Pages
—4. Trailers, Clips, DVDs, Books, Soundtrack
—5. Posters (Current Movies)
—6. Production Notes (pdf)
—7. Spiritual Connections
—8. Presentation Downloads
Final Destination 3 continues the movie franchise which also happens to serve as the latest incarnation of the slasher film sub-genre of horror movie. Franchises like Friday the 13th, Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street and, more importantly, their derivative knock-offs are the kinds of empty story-telling people think of when they think of horror. In this case, the killer isn’t some madman in a mask, or a dream-stalking terror, but Death itself wielding coincidence and circumstance as its weapons.Written by Glen Morgan and James Wong (writers from The X-Files, Space: Above and Beyond, and Millennium)–James Wong also directed–the movie makes you wonder if they have exhausted the possibilities of the franchise. More remake than sequel, as these types of franchises usually are, the movie sticks to the formula that made the original a success. Final Destination 3 delivers more of what the audience has come to expect from these movies. Don’t get me wrong, what it does it does quite effectively, there’s just not much of an actual story; it’s more like a premise.
The movie opens with the “what’s going to happen� premonition (always the highlight sequence of sheer terror and brutality). Whoever has the premonition avoids death along with several compatriots. Then death proceeds to stalk the survivors–in the order in which they would have died originally–in a series of creative and vicious deaths. Each death is felt–and whether intentional or not–reveled in. The audience becomes gleeful participants as they watch the movie by being invited to play the “how are they going to die� game. Sadly, the movie doesn’t give us characters to care about, but rather interchangeable caricatures that exist to be fodder: the Goth-lite duo, the token black (jock), the smart chick with not quite dumb guy, and the preening girls. One barely gets a sense of the lead character, just enough to almost care what happens to her.
I’ve been in an on-going conversation with my fellow Hollywood Jesus reviewer, Chris Utley, over my theology of horror article. I suspect that movies like Final Destination 3 are what he has in mind when he says “if I do see a horror film, it's only to glory in the ingenious methods in which the filmmakers off the characters.� Hopefully, murders/killings, no matter how inventive, should evoke a sense of horror, revulsion, and sadness in us. The evil presented in such films should move us to confront it where we find it and seek out redemption from it. Once we distance ourselves from the more objectionable elements of the story, we still have a story that has to be dealt/wrestled with. Sometimes, that is easier said than done; however, even Final Destination 3 gives us to plenty to wrestle with.
“It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting, for death is the destiny of every man; the living should take this to heart.�Horror is about fear and as Wendy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) puts it, “Fear is like a living thing. Always with me.� While this fear may stem, as her boyfriend put it, “from your sense of having no control,�ultimately what we are afraid of is death. Another strength of horror movies is that they force us to meditate on our mortality. In fact, the fear of death fuels horror. The one spiritual point that cannot be evaded is the fact that we are forced to confront the reality, and seeming randomness, of death. One character bemoans the unfairness and sheer capriciousness of death, as these young people die while others who do great evil live such long lives.
–Ecclesiastes 7:2
There is a wisdom that comes from contemplating death. The reality of death forces our main heroine to re-evaluate her life as to what is truly important, such as her relationship with her sister. With the idea of one’s impending mortality, the characters try to look for some sort of spiritual meaning to it all. At which point, the characters have to wrestle with whether they want to remain in a state of willful ignorance as to the reality of their situation.
"Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?"While the Devil’s Flight roller-coaster ride intones that “You can run but you can’t hide� and “This is the beginning of the end,� we have to ask the question “Is Death really the end?� The title Final Destination hints that death may be our ultimate destination, the great nothing that awaits us all. The fact of the matter is that death isn’t the end. Another one of the great things about horror movies is that we, or at least the characters in the movie if they have any depth to them whatsoever, have to deal with the question of “What happens after death?� What is our Final Destination?
–I Corinthians 15:55
“He will swallow up death forever. The Sovereign LORD will wipe away the tears from all faces; he will remove the disgrace of his people from all the earth. The LORD has spoken.�The ironic thing is that the object of the movie is for the characters to beat death. It is the one enemy that can’t be beaten and can’t be thwarted, at least not by running from it or trying to out-maneuver it. One of the internal rules of the movie is that if someone intervenes, if someone saves the next to die, the person fated to die can be skipped by death. As the Goth-lite male points out, only an act of self-sacrifice can thwart Death’s plan. Though Death is an enemy that stalks us, the movie’s theme echoes one presented in the Bible: that Death has been already overcome by the sacrificial death of Christ.
—Isaiah 25:8
My reminder take-home lesson from watching Underworld: Evolution is that watching movies is an expectations game. If you lower your expectations and enjoy this movie for what it is, you’re sure to have your expectations met. Both movies also remind us that any story, however slight that story may be, can be wrestled with. In Final Destination 3, Death inadvertently becomes something to be laughed at, our “whistling as we pass the cemetery� reaction to dealing with the idea of death. The movie literally presents dying as entertainment, a roller-coaster thrill ride that entertains by killing people. The movie is what it is, without pretension or aspiration to anything greater. The death scenes in this movie franchise are some of the most creative ever filmed and ultimately, that’s what the audience wants to see: campy fun with top notch gore. If you enjoy the Final Destination movies, then you have more of what you came for... with different faces.
— Overview
12 Comments:
That's a good review actually. though I'm not familiar with the "Final Destination" subject matter. I don't play daft games like that, and usually I don't like computer game movie franchises... usually. I might like some of the Japanese ones.
But yes - I like some of Maurice's ideas, there's no two ways about it!
Or am I thinking of "Final Fantasy" as a movie franchise? Anyway, I just wanted to say that I liked some of your ideas about horror fiction, Maurice. It should be there to make us *feel* things, not just to bedazzle you with sensation. I read that little two-handed discussion you had with Chris Utley, on another post... It was interesting! (Still, to be just, I don't think Chris was saying that he did unequivocally revel in destruction for its own sake... I just thought he was saying that horror movies tended to encourage that in him, and so he tried to leave them out... a noble endeavour!! (I like it when somebody does something for their faith, I really do!))
But yeah: I think that the best horror movies should make you feel pity, and terror. Anne Rice does that. Sometimes, when she's not wrapping you up in the "sensuous" bit! (That's another function of horror and the macabre - vampires as soft porn! I love it! But only when it's really classy....)
Trouble is, that so many modern "franchise" movies are much too shallow, to engender real feelings and sympathies in the audience. They just want or get "a laff" as kids at my school used to call it.
if you look at the original movies that launch the franchise, those are usually fairly good. the first final destination (yeah, you may have been thinking of final fantasy, the game-cum-bad movie) was inventive and different. final destination the franchise, has been a re-hash of the same thing.
unfortunately, franchise usually mean shallow movies and lazy film-making.
what did you think of anne rice's latest book?
I have not read the one about Jesus yet! As I will finally tell you and Kevin, Maurice, in a "recording" I am currently making (apparently livejournal allows for voice files too, this is interesting!), there is just SO MUCH, brilliant and varied material, in the modern fantasy and "crossover" (young adults' fantasy) markets... that it is impossible to keep up with even one's favourite authors... if one wants to allow a bit of money and time for the others. (I love picking up paperbacks, and the odd hardback, I love the substantiality of hardbacks! - really cheap at supermarkets like Morrison's (nothing to do with Grant!) and Tesco in UK, which you can only do if they are adult/children's bestsellers.. otherwise... well Amazon is usually somewhat discounted, especially once things get into paperback!)
I would like to contrast this "embarass de richesse" in the modern fantasy market, again with the modern "graphic novel" market, which as I have told you, I have found repetitive, and mainly full of either "dark"/horror, or a very cynical kind of porn... I am not counting mangas in this as they come from another culture.
Anyway... yes, I've heard of that "fairy tale" series of comics, for instance, and the one called "Y: the Last Man" (yet something further for teenage boys!) but they just don't seem to have cracked that originality/diversity barrier for me!
Looking forward to getting my non-vampire teeth into that last one by Anne Rice though... looks like a good read.
y: the last man is definitely not a book for teenage boys.
Looks like it, though, Mo! Might be a bit raunchy-looking, but I've seen the reviews: I've seen extracts on Amazon... the character is a guy in his very late teens.. he's 19 isn't he - 20 at the most!! He's a male (from Australia I think) and he's got a male monkey, and together they are the last male creatures in the world - they think!! Because of a gender-specific disease. And then they meet all these rather aggressive females who have taken over the male role.. and the usual soft-porn type fight scenarios ensue... and there are a few rather disparaging bits about lesbians, aren't there... honestly, if it weren't so sexist-looking, I would have probably bought it by now! Come on it's for young men.... the usual, boring target market of this industry! I expect that mums, particularly Christian mums, wouldn't really want their teenage sons reading it, but I bet many will. It looks like a niche marketing exercise, to me!
(And yes, I COULD come up with a better flippin' comic! But I need an ARTIST... preferably a team of 'em!)
you might want to try reading it so that you have an informed opinion.
Yeah. I know. But it's all over the net, so I get the gist. (Interesting style of artwork, BTW... almost "hyper-realism" - but again, not of the style I would commission personally.)
Lots of people could come up with better scripts for adult comics. I know I could! Why do comics always have to be simplistic, anyway, in this day and age?? Why do they have to be semi-camp cyberpunk? Why can't they have REALLY complex plots and characterisation, as much modern SF does??
And AS for Frank Miller... he is a real jerk. A clown. Just look what he's doing now - unbelievable. Come and visit me at my blog, I have all the info laid out there waiting for you! Weblinks and all.
again, you might want to actually read the book before you dismiss its characterization or plot.
You mean, "Holy Terror, Batman!"?!
Well - as the Joker would say - HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! Ad nauseam.
The stupid (incongruously camp) title - says it all!
And seeing as Miller said in his interview that it came "from an explosion in my gut" I would like to disrespectfully suggest that all it will come out as is a form of diarrhoea!
(Hoo-ray - looks like I'm getting the hang of HTML!)
Well, I mean, come on, Holy Terror, Batman?!! I'm supposed to take this seriously?
If he's serious about writing a story which concerns Osama or Al Qaeda - why not at least give it the dignity of a decent title?
Though the reaction of Muslims or anybody associated with that part of the world (Afghanistan) where it is obviously going to be set... is NOT going to be positive, whatever they call it! Capiche??
Trust Americans - they see a mess, and they make it worse! (Well. SOME of them, certain "layers", as the WSWS would put it, enjoy doing just that, let's say. You should see the amount of US rightist blogs that have taken up the "bombhead Mohammed" cartoons as some sort of icon!)
I bet that's just about the level that Frank Miller's effort will be on, as well. Nothing about his work has ever convinced me that he is subtle, humanistic, or nuanced.
Why not comment on this issue, on the top of my site - bet you haven't visited that page yet!
1) that's not going to be the name of the title
2) do you have anything related to, i don't know, this movie instead of plugging your site?
Post a Comment
<< Home