Saturday, January 21, 2006

Underworld: Evolution

—1. Overview
—2. Cast and Crew
—3. Photo Pages
—4. Trailers, Clips, DVDs, Books, Soundtrack
—5. Posters (Kate Beckinsale)
—6. Production Notes (pdf)
—7. Spiritual Connections
—8. Presentation Downloads


enlargeOne of the first movies that my wife convinced me to take her to when we were dating was Scary Movie. She thought it looked funny, and I wanted to please her, so I paid what few hard earned dollars I had for us to spend an evening at the movies. It turned out to be a cinematic experience so miserable that she apologized to me afterward. After seeing Underworld: Evolution, someone owes me an apology.

I want two hours of my life back.

I’m now convinced that I’m going to be on my deathbed, re-tracing my life, and I’m going to remember that I once sat through
Carnosaur 2 and Underworld: Evolution. And frankly, there were enough unanswered questions from the first Carnosaur to justify me watching the second—at least compared to trying to justify Underworld: Evolution. Having seen the first Underworld, it’s not like I expected a whole lot: Kate Beckinsale, as Selene the Death Dealer, running around in a tight leather outfit shooting a lot of bullets at monsters. That, by the way, is a better plot summary than the barely-one-step-above-a-video-game thing that passed for this movie's screenplay. Before you ask why I went to see this in the first place, I will remind you that sequels of these type of cult movies tend to be better than the original. They tend to up the action quotient, deepen the mythology, create more of a thrill ride, and possibly—possibly—even become a director’s franchise. Not so here.

I want two hours of my life back.

Underworld: Evolution picks up after the ending credits of the first Underworld. So we are in the midst of this overly-Machiavellian, grand conspiracy/war between the lycans (werewolves) and the vampires. [This is basically a story set in the White Wolf gaming company’s Vampyre (the basis of the television series Kindred: The Embraced) and Werewolf games universe, but the uninitiated are not supposed to notice.] The movie is relentless action with no point. The frenetic direction mostly illustrates director Len Wiseman’s love of things crashing through walls. The action literally only stops long enough for gratuitous sex scenes or the one bit of exposition that supposedly explains why everyone is running around shooting and otherwise trying to maim one another. Yes, I said gratuitous—because the randomness of it, like the rest of the movie, made no sense. Sadly, I kept waiting for the movie to start making sense, but by the time it did, I no longer cared.

Vampires represent a resurrection to darkness. In vampires you see the perversion of the idea of blood being necessary for eternal life.
Underworld: Evolution continues in the Postmodern era’s tradition of distancing itself from the religious elements of vampire mythology, though sunlight is still an effective weapon against vampires and blood is still essential for the transmission of what they are as well as their reason for being immortal. The lure of vampires, from the original to Anne Rice’s depiction of them, has been their seductive underside. Vampires seem more free, civilized, almost aristocratic; frankly, they have been over-Romanticized. Werewolves, by comparison, are savage—beasts reminding us that we have a corrupted self inside us. A side, a nature, in us that we must tame, restrain, or kill.
“Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned�
—Romans 5:12
“The journey to the truth� is through the blood, Marcus says. Echoes of the story of Christ reverberate through this movie. SPOILER WARNING (I think. Who knows if I’ve even grasped the plot fully): Much of the movie revolves around the search for Alexander Corvinus (Derek Jacobi, a long way from his I, Claudius days), who is essentially the “Adam� (the first) of the vampire and werewolf clans. He is the father to twin sons, Marcus (Tony Curran), the original vampire; and William (Brian Steele), the original werewolf. Yet, despite the evil his sons immediately inflict on the world, he cannot bring himself to destroy them.
“For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.�
—I Corinthians 15:21-22
Selene and Michael Corvin (Scott Speedman as the half-breed or hybrid rescued from the first Underworld) represent the future. The “second Adam,� much like what Christ did, takes on the traits of the first—takes on his very nature—but lives the life meant to be lived. In effect, the second Adam redeems the life and sin of the first. Through facing temptation, through trials, even through a death and resurrection (including an “ascension� in to [sun] light), the lives of the second Adams provide the example for others to follow.

I’m still wondering how a movie full of vampires, werewolves, non-stop action, and a leather-clad Kate Beckinsale sucked so badly. Though I am tempted to make a list of the things I could have done instead of watching this movie, I will continue to concentrate on the themes drawn out of the movie—though even the echoes of the story of redemption are not enough to save it.

— Overview

25 Comments:

Reviews by Mark Stokes said...

Now I don't feel so bad about writing my negative review of HOODWINKED. I still remain in awe of your ability to discuss theological & literary depth in even the suckiest of films. Keep it up (and, because I consider you a friend, I must warn you to stay away from GOODBURGER).

4:13 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

thanks! i'm going to bask in the glow of your compliment, because i know the negative comments are coming soon.

9:55 PM  
Anonymous said...

The reason this movie failed so miserably was in your statement about post-modern Hollywood. This movie lack a moral premise. The first movie at least had the analogy to the power of truth - which of course comes from God. Selene became the representative of good when she learned the truth. Her power came from her stand for right. This movie distanced itself too far from any moral premise (Post-modern's downfall) Consequently, I too feel robbed of two hours of my life and a need to repent for even going in the first place.

6:47 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Nice to see you in a "pissy" mood for a change. :) Thanks for preserving two hours of my life. I was going to catch this on Tuesday.

k

8:31 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

yeah, if you'd gone to the movie and loved it, i'd have never heard the end of it. :-)

9:09 PM  
socialist said...

You say it's so rubbish: and then you manage to describe the plot so well!

It can't have been that bad! (And I didn't know it was based on a "games universe"... goodness me, one learns something every day. Still thought it was a good concept, though. Loved the trailers. I think they should make a whole movie out of trailers. Or in the style of a trailer, perhaps.)

6:55 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

here's my one sentence review of the movie: it's like watching the second half of a movie you no longer care about.

8:30 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

and trailers are a whole different art than movies. that's why there are people who specialize in making trailers.

course, i also think that 1) movies can't be expected to keep up the intensity of the trailer without being ridiculous or 2) there are some trailers that reveal so many plot points of the movie that i can skip the full feature.

8:32 PM  
Gregory John Mattus said...

I am a Christian mental health counselor and I found this to be an exceptionally good movie. I saw it with a non-Christian female friend who has, like Selene, suffered much trauma and abuse in her life. And like many emotionally scarred people, she has engaged in many self-destructive activites. For such people, there is great value in seeing other courageous women battling those who would oppress them. And for those who have cut their own flesh in their despair, there is a healing and redemptive experience in seeing Selene be horribly wounded yet survive and heal. Perhaps you have spent too much time in your comfortable Christian reality to be able to recognize opportunities for spiritual growth for others when presented in such movies. As a result of my being willing to enter my friend's world via the UNDERGROUND movies, she is now willing to view THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST with me. Perhaps in the process she shall see the true healing power of Christ's blood. Can you learn to see gospel images in such movies as UNDERGROUND 2, or is "Post Modern" just a phrase you toss about?

7:45 AM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

"my comfortable Christian reality." that's rich.

so anyway, i try to do two things when i do reviews of movies. one is assess it as a movie, in terms of ability to tell a story, develop characters, quality of the direction. as such, underworld was not a good movie.

the second is try and find its "value", or make spiritual connections to the movie. i saw selene/michael as "second adam"/christ figures and drew out the imagery touched upon in the movie.

as for my ability to see the value in such movies ... sigh ... you may want to go back and read my "theology of horror" essays a bit more closely.

as for the "value in seeing other courageous women battling those who would oppress them"--aeon flux and elektra were two other such "empowering" movies. both were also muddled messes of movies also.

but that's me and my views from "my comfortable Christian reality." this may be my new favorite description of myself.

9:35 AM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

now you do bring up an interesting premise. reviewing the movie building on the theme of the empowered female. this is another reason why these movies ought to be wrestled with.

that may be the angle i take when i review aeon flux. though i'd still point out that it was a mess of a movie.

10:05 AM  
socialist (yes, that's me, liz!) said...

Yeah, I see your point about the trailers giving too much away...

I have honestly seen trailers that were better than the movie, though.

So - who makes most of Hollywood's trailers - do you happen to know? Do they write books about how they do it? Or websites?

11:54 AM  
liz the socialist from across the waves said...

Life just isn't fair! *Now* Maurice is getting blamed for not seeing enough of the "gospel" in movies he doesn't like - when I have recently "accused" him of seeing too MUCH of it in comics I don't like!!

Hey guys. Check out Maurice's "Dark Knight Returns" page and see what I mean!

What I'm maintaining, is that I have a great respect for Jesus of Nazareth, actually. So: I don't believe that a hero who engages in evil or immorality (the sort that involves egoism and cruelty, not talking to loose women) can be like him.

12:01 PM  
Liz said...

Maybe the heroine was too "cold". I think that "warm" heroines with a sense of humour, like Buffy, actually work better!

Moviemakers and other fictionsmiths have to, I think, work on creating characters that the audience is going to care about. This consists of either making them sympathetic - or attractive in some other way, magnetic... "the villain we'd all like to be"... like Lestat! I adored him from the first, well at least I was well impressed, even though I found him scary and nasty in Anne Rice's first book.

(Those are the sort of books that people in their teens and early twenties really want to read, and should read! Real page-turners... the sort that make the impressionable think: "Wow... look at what they're doing - I can hardly bear to read such iniquity but it's so compelling!" It's thrilling, you know... like watching Dr Who's Daleks from behind the sofa when you were much younger - that's what gives pleasure. Now if they could bottle that... Actually I think that when screenwriters can concentrate on thrilling people, rather than disgusting them with lots of gooey slime and so on - that makes a better movie.

(That was my experience of a good book. Quite unlike You Know Who!)

Movie of "IWV" was quite good, but not nearly as good as any of Rice's books.

12:13 PM  
Anonymous said...

Now that Maurice Broaddus has become a big shot at HJ, he has resorted to movie snobbery. No longer does the delicious battle between Lycans and vampires entertain him for who would think that when Werewolves and Vampires are challenging each other for power there would be a whole heck of alot of blood and guts. This movie is actually quite enjoyable if you like Vampires, stories and movies in general. If your job is to critique everything, then maybe the cosmic battle between good and evil no longer interest you. Maybe one could go and have some caviar at the nearest country club instead.

9:24 AM  
Reviews by Mark Stokes said...

Maurice, you're getting CAVIAR out of this deal? How do you do it? Whenever I'm feeling ritzy, I've still gotta catch my OWN fish and hope they're carrying eggs.

Seriously, though, I don't think you've got a complete picture of Maurice. When I went to the HJ gathering, I was surprised NOT to find the 8-foot-tall Shaft-meets-Morpheus-meets-Conan character I was expecting. He's actually QUITE personable and finds it difficult to refrain from smiling (I hope I didn't just ruin your image, Maurice). Lately, though, he's been kept quite busy writing a few short stories that are getting international recognition in comics, anthologies and horror magazines. It's a regret of all of us at HJ that we don't always spend as much time on here as we'd like, but I PROMISE Maurice's isn't as case of the snobbies.

12:23 PM  
socialist liz said...

Oh, oh, so Maurice is getting international recognition, is he? (Nearly, I believe... it's coming... but not quite yet!)

For from time to time I enter his name in amazon.com, you see.... to date without success! I entered it just now - this is true - and I did in fact get a link, which got me excited for about one second, until I found that it was... to guess what? *A blaxploitation pic starring Pam Grier*!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!

I thought it might have been because he'd reviewed it on there, but it wasn't: it was because there were two bit actors, one with his first name, the other with his surname. Try it for yourself. It's fun!

Maurice, I swear that if you don't notify me when the first of your novels in the "mythological series" - you know the one of which I speak - perhaps a better epithet is "the archetypal series"? - comes out, and you don't send me a personal e-mail beforehand... I'm going to make you sorry.

2:51 PM  
Reviews by Mark Stokes said...

Has anyone seen the film MISERY?

I don't know WHY that popped in my head just now...

7:55 PM  
Lauren said...

LOL @ Mark!

Maurice, all I have to say is: I want two hours of my life back! You're the one who talked me into going. You're making it up to me somehow.

(Now you've got both your "stalkers" after you. ;-) )

Anyway, good review. And props for the straw grasping. :-)

8:15 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

as i sit here, ensconced in my towering spires overlooking grand vistas from the big bucks i pull down as a hollywood jesus reviewer, i can only scoff while drinking krystal and opining on the greatness of obscure foreign films at this point in my career.

or ...

i could point out that the story-telling in underworld: evolution was so muddled that even the supposed "grand battle between good and evil" was barely made clear. it was more like motivated self-interest.

9:47 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

consider this review: evolution. i've gone from a full blown review, to a one line review, to now a two word review:

gratuitous poo.

9:48 PM  
socialist liz said...

Neah. I'm much more SUBTLE than that! Mark.

Anyway, how can it be "Misery" if Maurice hasn't published any of his novels yet?

Hey, yeah, you're right, Maurice! "Gratuituous poo"... that should be applied to all Hollywood horror movies where someone has actually had a faintly original idea for a theme.

Still looking forward to your eventual Amazon.com appearance...

7:07 PM  
Sam Ewing said...

Hello Maurice,
I found your review of this film quite thoughtful especially considering the "completely don't have a clue" attitude of Hollywood. Can someone hire writers, directors, and producers who care about making a film? I think part of the problem stems from poor writing and the idea that if a good amount of special effects is good then an overwhelming tidal wave of CGI special effects is the winning formula. I'm getting the same perception about the movie 'Ultraviolet' after seeing the trailer.
Sincerely,
Sam

4:34 AM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

i know what you mean sam. i understand that movies are collaborative by nature, but it seems like accountants and studio execs are deciding what movies to be made. and how they're made. as opposed to writers/directors with a vision.

5:15 AM  
Anonymous said...

Good Grief, it's a movie! I loved it and I thought it took the story to another level, a believable level (I mean, we are talking about vampires and werewolves)and the story takes us to the second phase of Michael and Selene's relationship. And they were not looking for Alexander Corvinus......did you actually watch the whole thing?

3:27 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home