Monday, May 23, 2005

Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith

—Overview
—Photos

—About this Film pdf
—Spiritual Connections


Click to enlargeSince it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to guess that there were going to be a ton of Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith reviews, I struggled with whether or not to bother writing one. But, hey, why not add another voice to the chorus? One of the great things about the reviews on Hollywood Jesus is that no two reviewers see things quite the same way on any given movie.

Previous entries into the most recent Star Wars trilogy, The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones, were Exhibits A and B in making the case that George Lucas was more master craftsman than effortless storyteller. The power of his productions has been his ability to submerge the viewer in his fully imagined galaxy. In Revenge of the Sith, the detail of his vision gave his dizzying city vistas and space battles an urgency in and of themselves. But ultimately, for all of Lucas' technical wizardry, it is the story, the space opera, that draws us into the movie. And this is the story that we all have been wanting to see: the tragic finale to a good man's final capitulation to the dark side.

This time around, the movie’s plot keeps more to the things that made the original trilogy great. In Episodes I and II, the epic story of the hero—or in this case the descent of a hero—didn’t mesh well with the less-than-epic story of political drama and intrigue. Politics had plagued this most recent trilogy of movies, bogging the stories down to the point where an hour of C-SPAN held more drama. Not even serious politics—since they are of the “don’t think too hard because they don’t make a lot of sense� variety—they seemed like exercises in pontification while waiting for the third movie to come out.

18.jpg (651 K)And one certainly doesn’t stay up until 12:01 a.m. on opening day for great acting or scintillating dialogue, either. Unfortunately, Hayden Christensen (as Anakin) lacks the gravitas needed to show the torment of his slow descent to the dark side (especially noticed when compared side-by-side to even one line reading by James Earl Jones). But Ewan McGregor (as Obi-Wan Kenobi) seems in tune with the spirit of his character, bringing a sense of whimsey to his portrayal. Only Ian McDiarmid (as Emperor Palpatine/Darth Sidious) matches his performance, probably because he’s given some lively dialogue to work with. Even the best actors and actresses can only do so much with the stilted, joyless dialogue to deliver. In the end, everyone was nearly upstaged by R2D2 threatening to steal the show. Since everything about the movie had a knowing sense of consequence to it, the cast didn’t deliver dialogue—they made pronouncements.

All of which points back to the fact that it was the story—the visually stunning story—that counted. A story that abounds in spiritual implications.

“A prophecy misread could have been.� –Yoda.

One of the primary overarching themes of the movie could be described as a misunderstanding of religion. In a lot of ways, this is a journey of faith. Faith can be abused, misdirected, mistaught, even mis-believed; the faithful always fear the possibility that somehow they might depart (or be led astray) from sound doctrine. To paraphrase one sentiment in the movie: to understand mystery, you must understand all aspects of the force, not just the narrow dogmatic view of the Jedi. This makes the Jedi sound like some brand of spiritual fundamentalist. It is not bad to question your faith; some questioning is healthy. However, this critique is given by one who sees himself as the polar opposite of the Jedi.

“This is how liberty dies: with thunderous applause.� –Padmee

This idea of faith gets further complicated once it gets in bed with politics. The question that gets to crux of the matter is what if the Democracy they had been fighting for, the Republic, becomes the thing that they are fighting against? There are enough pointed parallels between the Empire and the state of the American government to choke Jar-Jar, but this does open the door for some valid examination. Religion and politics each their own raison d’etre. When the two blur the lines between one another, it leads to a kind of imperial religion. Spirituality, one’s faith, should inform one’s politics, not the other way around. Politics is about power and power always lusts for more power, leading to Machiavellian (or his intergalactic counterpart) level scheming. When the two conjoin, the danger rests in keeping politics from co-opting the spirituality.

This story also touches on the reality that the characters live in a state of “spoiled creation.� In Anakin’s case, he was deceived by a lie. The Sith’s passions focused inward, thinking of the self; the Jedi were selfless, always thinking of others. However, good became a matter of point of view (the Jedi were liars and power-grubbers; the Sith possessors of secret knowledge) and truth was allowed to be misunderstood (read: ignored).

The path of darkness was paved with good intentions as a good end was attempted through evil means. “Fear is a path to the dark side.� Throw in hate and anger leading down toward an inevitable path of death and destruction and you have the symptoms that diagnose the dark side, being the fallen state of man. Said another way, living in a state of broken creation means that we are being untrue to what we were created to be.

Hope for finding our way through this broken creation could be found in the power of discipleship. In Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, you see what amounts to a tale of two masters. On the one hand, you have Darth Sidious, the dark master dangling temptations of power and salvation. On the other hand, you have Ben Kenobi, lifelong friend and mentor. And one cannot escape the powerful image of this being a story of a master betrayed by his disciple.

What we can’t escape is the power of learning in community. We’ve lost the idea of journeying with our teachers, the sense that teaching and knowing have a relational component. The master-student relationship is an important one when it comes to the idea of “making disciples.� In a lot of ways, people have gotten away from what the picture of making a disciple looked like. Anakin made becoming a master a reward, a power position to be obtained, rather than the act of humbly serving others. It called for a teacher to walk alongside his disciples, live life with them. The master/teacher embodies, incarnates if you will, that teaching and faith are lived out in the context of a community. No, this is not a perfect way to do it: Jesus walked alongside his disciples for three years and most of the time they didn’t seem to get the point.

“I feel lost ... I’m not the Jedi I should be.� –Anakin Skywalker

Which leads to the last element of story that this movie is about, this being a telling of the story of a Judas, one who walks in discipleship then betrays his master and his teachings: a good man, for all intents and purposes, led down a dark path because of some internal discontent. Most of us have this feeling that something is missing, but we don’t know how to fix it. Also, whether we admit it or not, there is this longing to be more, to live lives of significance.

We have this sense of lost-ness. This sense of incompleteness is necessary, as it hints of there being some greater story and purpose about life that we might be missing, one that should drive us to the Author of that Story. In our rush to plug that hole, we run the risk of filling it with the wrong thing. Anakin was lost, but he was found by Darth Sidious, then dubbed Darth Vader by him. And to be named is to be owned and defined. This led to a series of tragedies that eventuated in a wholesale slaughter of Jedi knights that echoed the persecution of the saints of the early church.

There is a lot to be explored in the themes of this movie. In short, this was the movie that everyone wanted to see, the one that took three tries to get right. A high action cinematic experience tinged with a sense of tragic grandeur, Revenge of the Sith brings the sprawling saga we’ve come to love full circle.

Like you really needed a reason to see it.

Review by Kevin Miller
Review by Ed Travis
Review by Tom Price
Review by PapaBear
Review by Matthew Hill

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film pdf
—Spiritual Connections

19 Comments:

Crystal said...

I joined the crowd for the midnight showing on Wednesday and liked it very much, and then went AGAIN on Saturday and liked it VERY MUCH MORE (there is something to be said for being AWAKE for a movie like that). Granted, the acting was poor (Anakin does a great job of crying through his teeth all of the time. C'mon, dude, are you five?), but isn't Star Wars sort of infamous for cheesy dialogue?

I think the mythology is fascinating... and I kinda felt a part of Anakin's struggle. You could almost identify with him... put yourself in his shoes... by the time he became Vader. The Jedi council didn't trust him, he knew the dark side was evil but at the same time, the emporer had some good points... and was offering him not only leadership, but a way to save his wife. When he might have been convicted for his pride, he could remind himself that he was also being benevolent, and forget that he was reacting almost completely out of fear and selfishness. Isn't that the way it often goes?

Oddly enough, the group I went with on Saturday to see it (some folk from College Park) and I got into an interesting conversation afterward about how the Jedi council compares to the Church, and how easily some people can be turned away just because we tend to fumble or get legalistic... how deceptive the "dark side" can be, and how quickly we are decieved when we let our fears and pride become deciding factors in our actions. It almost highlighted, for me, the importance of checking motives.

In the end, any of us could potentially be Anakin Skywalker, and the best intentions could put is in a big ugly black suit and have us marching to take over the galaxy.

~Crystal

12:41 PM  
Sheryl said...

"Star Wars is like pizza. Even when it's bad, it's still pizza."

5:18 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

i think that the jedi council as the Church is an idea worth exploring (or at least me thinking about for a bit). i like the comparison.

10:40 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

yeah, but finally we have a very good (3.5/4) pizza. we've coasted on some technically brilliant bad (well, 2/4) pizza for too long now.

10:41 PM  
Liz the Brit said...

Now THIS was a good HJ-style review, Maurice! Thank you!

(I think I understand the "house style" now! At last!)

It DOES sound like a good entry in the "Star Wars" series...

Will it REALLY be the last though??

I like your snippets concerning paralells in the movie between this fictional universe and American/world politics: "There are enough pointed parallels between the Empire and the state of the American government to choke Jar-Jar"! Hmm!

Yes, I've read another guy, a historian whose name I can't remember off the top of my head - but I do have his book - compare Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader to the "good sides" and "dark sides" of America, as a leading world nation.

(The WSWS hated that man's book, by the way, and I couldn't work out why, it was pretty innocuous: it was on a British leftish TV channel, after all... Oh, I'd better find it now! The name of the historian, I won't trouble you with the site reference. Hang on a mo: Niall Ferguson, that's it. Wrote a book called "Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire."

But I thought the guy had a point! At least in his Lucas-related musings!)

DOES the US want to be a benevolent Luke Skywalker (Marshall Plan, and all that, in the age of social co-operation following the last world war?)

Or DOES it want to be an evil Darth Vader, all dressed in fascist black?

I know what I think it currently most resembles!!

If Maurice ever wants to ask me, by the way, WHY I seem to "look up" to the WSWS web site all the time, by the way... Well, it's because the Marxists, whatever their faults, have all the theory, you see... Especially the Trotskyists. It's hard to poke a hole in anything they say! (Though I have tried, occasionally!)

Anarcho-socialists, this is the difference, are much freer to experiment however they like - but they don't have the unified body of theory...

Oh and Crystal and everyone, don't be scared, we don't all have piercings, we don't have bombs, we don't really do anything scary! (Yet!)

I'm more Michael Moore than.. who do you people think of as the boogeyman?

Darth Vader! That's right!

Are you all going to leave comments on Kevin's review of the same movie? I think you should, you know: I think you might try saying how you think the first movies were "better", or something - what are the main differences, I wonder?

Cos I think he's quite upset at the movie!!

9:18 AM  
Crystal said...

I think that a lot of people were upset about the movie, but they were expecting something from it that it was not going to be. Ep 3 was PART of a great story... it wasn't a great story in itself. You know? And as that, a part, it was very good. It could never make it as a standalone movie... but it was never supposed to be a standalone movie. Star Wars is not really about plot, or acting, or even special effects (althoug if it were going to be "about" anything, the last is I'm sure what it'd pick). It's about an epic story... a myth, if you will. "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away". It's like reading Greek Mythology or studying the Bible and saying, "I really hate the writing style". It's not about that. It's just a story that's been told, and Lucas told it in his way. Someone else could tell it another way. Someone ELSE could tell it another way!

At any rate, I thought that Lucas told the story fairly well, even WITH the corny acting and the lack of depth into some of the plotlines. It's almost as if... if you could watch it as though you were reading it, and fill in the spaces, and think of the characters as CHARACTERS and not as the actors who portray them... you can love it. If not, then you will always be left wanting.

Piercings and bombs? lol, well alrighty then, I suppose that's a good thing. Piercings aren't a big problem for me personally, but I don't care much for bombs, so I guess we're good.

~Crystal

11:10 AM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

crystal, i think you make an interesting point: this is part of an epic story. but i think it's one that could have been made in two movies (with someone other than lucas writing it).

liz, glag to know you approve of this review. somehow i suspected that my comparisons of "empires" would please you. (-:

11:25 AM  
Liz the Brit said...

Sorry Crystal! I had to be SURE you didn't get the wrong idea... Most "lefties" are VERY "ordinary"... There is however a STEREOTYPE now in the popular imagination...

There must be some risks in coming out as an "anarcho-socialist" on a Christian site - even a liberal Christian site!

12:48 PM  
Liz the Brit said...

Maurice: "empires", yes.

Needs a lot of musing about!

12:59 PM  
Liz the Brit said...

Crystal? Do you go on Kevin's site much?

Can you click on "Kevin Miller" along the side here, and then go to his "Revenge of the Sith" movie review, which should be on top, and leave him a comment?

I think you are just the person to say something calming...

Otherwise he will just get into a big fight with Maurice and me about "why there could/should have been only two movies" or something.

My guilt complex is already kicking in...

3:06 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Maurice: This is a tremendous review! I think the time you took to mull things over was worth it. As for me, I was too blinded by disappointment to even get into the things you discuss, but now that I read your review, I see all of them there. So perhaps this film redeems itself after all...

11:20 AM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

"mull": what a polite word to describe the process. you should see the drafts that didn't see the light of day.

i think i went in refusing to be disappointed by this movie. then again, that may be a polite way of saying that i set my expectations low.

despite the cool trailers and hype.

12:55 PM  
Ron said...

I just read your review, and I never really considered the whole early church parallel...very cool.
every thing else you pointed out, I would say that I had similar views, but there were a few that did not go in depth.
excellent review.

5:15 PM  
Liz the Brit said...

Take a little look at this...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1489920,00.html

"'George Lucas could be messing with your head' - Pumba the homosexual warthog [sorry Maurice - I didn't put this in, it was the Guardian!], Ozzy, and now George Lucas. The boycotters of the right are hilarious."

6:30 PM  
Misha said...

Hello,

I'm a French Canadian so I hope my English won't be too bad for you to read.

I agree with most of the comments posted here ( yes, I too see the Jedi as the Catholic Church when it's too dogmatic and inhuman) and most of all with Maurice's review.

But I'm a bit puzzled that till now nobody seems as perturbed as I am by the total lack of compassion that Obi Wan manifests toward Anakin, crying he's like a brother and simutaneously, letting him slowly slide to the lava ... Where are the heroes of my childhood offering a helping hand to the dying ennemy, (who refuse it and die because of his own hate)? Is this the way of the Jedi? Luke really renewed it because in this film, it is really dying!

Strnagely I forgive more easily to Anakin this horrible slaugthter of children, because he's now on the Dark Side and this is not "to do chic", it is really ugly that this lack of compassion from a Jedi. He gave up on Anakin too easily! Each time I tried to imagine how all this could have happen, I thought that Obi Wan was forced to let him go, not letting him die in such sufferings... am I too impregnated by Christian values? Perhaps after all, Jedi and Christian are really not the same. That will be some sort of comfort!

For me this scene spoils the film. It's like a wound somehow...
I just wanted to share it, hoping it cures it.

2:34 PM  
Maurice Broaddus said...

actually, no, you weren't the only one troubled by this.

that's some serious hate/hurt to have going on to let someone slide into lava or LET BE BURNED ALIVE rather than mercifully finish them off. anakin is obviously suffering, and obi wan had no problems cutting off his legs, so i can't imagine he could hide under "that's not the jedi way" to finish off a dying opponent.

9:06 AM  
Liz the Brit said...

Misha, that is an excellent point!

And no, your English is not perfect, qu'on dit, mais you express yourself VERY well! (My French needs a GOOD brush-up!)

"To do chic" - that is a good phrase and one I will borrow, if you will allow - though its English grammar is not perfect, it expresses everything relevant here! "Faire chic", hein? Or would it be "chic faire"? No, maybe "pour faire le chic"?!

I only watched the movie last night and, well, I completely overlooked the bit with the dying Anakin, thinking merely how horrible it was, and looking forward to his appearance in the black mask, that I knew would happen!

All these horrible "Kill Bill" movies and so on have desensitized me! It's really true! Drat! I thought I was above their stupid influence...

I KNOW now that I would have thought EXACTLY the same as you did, as a younger viewer... "Where are the heroes of my childhood", indeed - I've long wondered that! Of course a helping hand to the dying enemy should be offered, particularly if he is leglessly burning to death!

Anyway, Anakin was a friend... One REALLY has to put a special effort in for pals, however far they may fall! Obi Wan really did give up on him too easily... Unless, of course, he knew of a prophecy about Anakin we didn't... THAT might be a possibility, Misha!

But still it was a flaw in the plot. One would have spent ages answering a child's questions as to what and why.

As for Anakin's slaughter of children, I agree that he would have DONE it, as Darth - but probably not quite so soon... he hadn't had any time to accommodate to the villain's role and to harden his conscience! Probably after being left out on that lava - THEN he would have come back and done it!!

But this was a really good question.

To answer it, I will say something I know about chivalry. It is much the same the world over - whether Christian or Bushido. Christian chivalry may place more emphasis on forgiveness and protecting the weak. But even if Jedi were based more on Bushido - no it is NOT OK, to leave a pal like that! A fellow knight, no no no.... Pas comme ca! Bien dit!

11:25 PM  
Misha said...

OuF! I don't feel so much alone now that I read yours comments!

Yes, Liz the Brit, you can borrow the French expression "pour faire chic"!

According to my husband and his friend who had a preview of "Batman begins" the hero I'm looking for ( and you too, Liz) is there! So I'm going to read the comments on this film on the Hollywood Jesus site.

And Liz, if you're now conscious that all this hyperviolence in films begins to desensitize you, well you've won the battle against "deshumanisation". Good!

7:25 AM  
Liz the Brit said...

Yes, Misha...I HAVE now watched "Batman Begins", in the last few days.... and I agree that the portrayal of the hero therein is much more "sensitive" than that of Tim Burton's Batman... who seemed to have a rather odd propensity for casually - just CASUALLY, especially with some minor characters, even as if the audience weren't supposed to notice... "offing" villains!!

However, Christian Bale's Batman - and the script by David Goyer... well, basically, he refused to save Henri Ducard's (who apparently was the real Rh'as Al Ghul) life a second time... he just point blank REFUSED to do it, saying "I won't kill you but I don't have to save you!"

(People on message boards later explained this away, that it was because Al Ghul was miles more EVIL than all the other villains, he was responsible for the deaths of "millions of people"... these effects we however never saw, apart from some vague boasting on Neeson's part that his League of Shadows had caused the Gotham economic crisis... how? (And someone else I read on a message board retorted that THAT "justification" for killing the villain was like Rove/Cheney logic!!)

Heuh.... I think the Republicans have been at the script of "B.B." as well!!

WHEN can we get them out of the popular culture??

11:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home