Constantine
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film pdf
—Spiritual Connections
Most people associate horror with demons, Satanism, and witchcraft or slasher-type films. This being the case, few can understand how a horror film could possibly communicate the Gospel. From now on, whenver I'm confronted with this question, I will merely point to the movie Constantine and quote, “only in the face of horror do you find your noblest self.� This was easily the most theologically rich movies I have seen in a long time. It was like a tour of Dante’s Inferno—if Dante chain-smoked, that is.
“Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, ‘Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand.’� Matthew 12:25
The character of John Constantine was created by comic book deity Alan Moore (The Watchmen, From Hell, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen) during his run on the comic book Swamp Thing. The character was spun into his own series called Hellblazer (its definitive runs being under Jamie Delano and Garth Ennis), where Constantine became a noirish anti-hero in every sense of the word. Think of him as an exorcist-cum-hard boiled PI, casting out demons in his own name and under his own powers, relying on his ability to cheat and con them. He gets by playing one demon against another, even father against son. That becomes the sticking point of the character: somehow, in what should be the simplest cases of black vs. white, good vs. evil, Constantine manages to muck up the waters to an often frustrating shade of gray.
I came in fully expecting to hate this movie once I heard they had made Constantine American rather than British. (Look at how the Americanization of The League of Extra-Ordinary Gentlemen helped gut the original comic material when translated to film). Casting Keanu “he of the wooden acting school� Reeves rather than Sting (the actor of choice when the movie was originally proposed over a decade ago) or even James Marsters (Spike, from Buffy: The Vampire Slayer/Angel) made it nearly impossible for me to give this movie the benefit of the doubt.
But I was pleasantly surprised.
If you didn’t know anything about Constantine, then at first glance, this almost looks like The Devil’s Advocate, part II. Reeves continues to be drawn to the science-fiction/horror world. Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Johnny Mnemonic, The Matrix trilogy. I can see what drew him to this spiritual kinsmen of Neo, John Constantine. We all often feel like him, trapped somewhere between heaven and hell. Unsure if there is a plan to this life, because we can’t see much rhyme or reason to what happens here, we struggle to make it from one day to the next.
Constantine's struggle is shared by Detective Angela Dodson (Rachel Weisz) who’s investigating the apparent suicide of her twin sister. The difference between them is that Constantine, who is suffering from terminal lung cancer, labors under the knowledge of where he is destined to go when he dies. And it ain’t pretty. Dodson, meanwhile, is not even sure she believes in the spirit world, never mind an ultimate spiritual destination.
There is quite a bit about this movie that will/should make people uncomfortable. (The comic book always had that disturbing/“this feels wrong� sort of quality to it for me.) This movie, however, redeems the comic in a lot of ways. It focuses more clearly on the heart of what makes Constantine resonate with me. It reminds us of a world we like to pretend isn’t there, either from lack of belief or an all too real belief in it. The movie presents a positively Medieval view of Heaven and Hell. “Behind every wall, every window� this battle between Heaven and Hell wages, with Constantine caught in the middle. The reality of this constant battle, that Constantine had been witness to since his childhood, overwhelms him to the point of suicide. According to Constantine, God is a disinterested spectator, “a kid with an ant farm.� He and the demons vie to see who will rule Hell and take over the Earth. So Constantine merely capitulates to what he already sees as a foregone conclusion.
“Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord did we not prophecy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles? Then I will plainly tell them, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers.’� Matthew 7:22-23
His suicide lands him squarely in Hell, but he doesn't stay there for long. His body is resuscitated, and his spirit pulled back to earth. Even so, the awareness that Hell is his final destination alters Constantine's life to the point where his entire focus becomes trying to buy his way into heaven. Serving God in his own way and on his own terms, he “deports� those demons who intrude into our plane. Even though he knows why he is going to hell (because he tried to take his own life), he still wonders if, perhaps, he goes to church enough, prays enough, tithe's enough; perhaps he might, as W.C. Fields put it, "Find a loophole."
So Constantine finds himself caught in the Great Detente. In a scenario reminiscent of the opening chapter of the book of Job, God and the devil have made a bet of sorts. The angels in heaven and the demons in hell are not allowed to directly interfere with humans. Both sides are reduced to little more than “influence peddlers.� A balance must be maintained. Satan’s son, Mammon (if God could have a son, so could Satan, the movie posits) seeks to blow the balance out the water by fully entering our plane of existence. He aims to use the Spear of Destiny, the sword used to pierce Christ while He was on the cross, to do it.
Ultimately, this is a story about faith. Constantine is a man without faith. After all, what good is faith when he knows full well that there is a God and a devil, and that both were out to get him? He has plenty of head knowledge, but it doesn't translate into a heart knowledge that impacted his life (other than a sense of self-preservation). He lived life to keep his butt out of Hell just a little bit longer.
Plenty of other touchstones abound. The movie takes place in Los Angeles, the “City of Angels�. Billboards read “Your time is running out� and “Got Faith?� In a “baptism� scene, Det. Dodson gets a glimpse of what it means to be united in death, burial, and resurrection in her brief sojourn to Hell.
Overall, this felt like a good introduction to the world of Constantine, where we learn the rules and vocabulary, to a world we hadn’t seen. So, much like Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, there’s a lot of exposition, but if has the feel of the beginning of a franchise. Visually exciting, there was no shortage of imagination from first-time director, Francis Lawrence (best known for music videos). The scenes in Hell look right out of the pages of a Middle Ages art book. This was definitely one of the more satisfying horror movies/comic book translations in recent memory. Not quite The Matrix, not quite your standard horror movie, hopefully the movie won’t frustrate too many viewers with its "innovative" theology and it's refusal to tie up all the loose ends.
**************************
Spiritual Connections: The Constantine Gospel
At times, we have to dig pretty deep to find spiritual connections in a movie. At other times, we simply can’t escape them. Constantine definitely falls into the latter category. If The Matrix trilogy is the story of Christ in allegory, this movie is the systematic theology. Here are a few things we learn from Constantine:
We wonder if we’re doomed, yet we wander through life under the illusion that we can get through it under our own strength. This is how John Constantine enters the movie, attempting to live out his version of what he thinks his purpose is. He took it on himself to exorcize demons in order to impress God into letting him into heaven. Unfortunately for Constantine, God''s rules are different from Constantine's rules.
An issue that came up recently on a message board that I frequent was "When you read stories or see films dealing with the supernatural, do you want hard-and-fast explanations of the supernatural elements or do you prefer them left 'in the air,' open to interpretation?" For me, explanations are like rules, and the story has to stick to the rules. I like horror writer Geoff Cooper’s answer to this question: "If you're going to explain it, the explanation should be better than the mystery of not knowing." That is what the spiritual life is all about. Without too much searching, we sense or realize that there are rules to our existence. The law is written on our hearts or in a book waiting to reveal itself to us. This movie revolved around the law. For the Catholic church, a person who commits suicide goes to Hell. That’s the law. In the movie, the balance between good and evil, the non-interference pact between God and Satan, must be maintained. That’s also a law. Man has the choice to seek redemption. That’s the law.
It doesn’t matter if you don’t believe in God or the devil. As Det. Dodson says at one point, people are capable of their own evil. For another, both God and the devil believe in people. Both have invested themselves in the choices that people make for themselves and, thus, the battle for people’s souls was enjoined.
Humans have been granted a gift, one great enough to earn the jealousy of angels. It is the gift of redemption. God’s love is so great that no matter how bad we screw up, all we have to do is ask for forgiveness, and God will embrace us. We are not worthy of this gift, we have done nothing to earn it. It was given freely as a gift of God’s love.
Contrary to what Constantine believes at the outset of this film, we cannot earn redemption through his own efforts. Like Constantine, no matter how hard we try, our efforts are never good enough, and we fall short. Several times, Constantine comes close to saving the day under his own efforts, but just misses.
Only through the power of prayer and faith can we receive the gift of redemption. To be truly forgiven, you have to ask for absolution. A demon, Balthazar (Gavin McGregor Rossdale), gets tricked into confessing because he forgets this fact. Even Constantine has to be reminded of it, by Satan (a scene stealing Peter Stormare) no less, who explains why Constantine keeps seeming to fail.
The key to salvation is found through blood and (self-)sacrifice. Constantine has to shed his own blood and die (a second time), to give himself up voluntarily, to finally defeat evil. Only through this act is his redemption found.
Yes, there’s a plan for all of us. Constantine had to die twice before he figured this out. The angel Gabriel (Tilda Swinton) sums it up best: “Be the hand of God. It’s your choice. It’s always been your choice.�
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film pdf
—Spiritual Connections
31 Comments:
i just read your weblog(liked it, and I saw it the same way), and to comment on a detail, I think that I would have preferred Jason Marsters to Sting for the part of Constantine
peace
-ron-
i meant sting 20 years ago when they first talked about constantine. not sting now. [although, a sting now might've worked, if they played up the hard life aspect of constantine.]
Maurice,
Really, really enjoyed your review. I feel that you totally "got" this film in so many ways. You are a rare breed--someone who appears to be as well versed with Hellblazer and the writings of Alan Moore as you are with the gospel of Christ--and you have no trouble bringing these two seemingly disparate elements together in dialogue. You have brought a much-needed perspective to this film that few others could have achieved. Thanks!
Kevin
Maurice,
I greatly appreciate the reviews of yourself and others at hollywoodjesus. They bring a much needed perspective that most Christian movie review sites do not. That being said, I still feel that you need to be more meticulous in researching what you may say about a given denomination. In your review of Constantine you state, "For the Catholic church, a person who commits suicide goes to hell." This is patently untrue and should be edited from your review. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that, "We should not despair of the eternal salvation of persons who have taken their own lives. By ways known to Him alone, God can provide the opportunity for salutary repentance. The church prays for persons who have taken their own lives." In the future when making such a statement please research your facts. Your reviews and the spiritual connections made in them are great but you need to be careful that you are not alienating those you are trying to reach through those connections.
Thank you,
Ed
thank you for your comments and clarification. the movie presents that commonly held Catholic view since the plot revolves around that bit of dogma. in fact, my catholic friends also thought that was the case. (and i confess, i did think that the common interpretation/belief was that suicides go to hell.) thank you for pointing this out.
Hey Maurice-
I just didn't connect with this movie. I didn't feel like the story drew me in enough, and I really deeply felt the sort of token "nighclub" scene (why does there always have to be a hip nightclub???), and the uninspired vision of hell. I just felt like there was some sort of lack of originality that nagged at me. But I will say I've thought about the movie afterwards more than I expected to, and maybe reading your review is one of the reasons. Thanks for the time you obviously spent writing this review.
Oh, and I hadn't thought about it...but Sting at any phase of his life would have been AMAZING as Constantine...no question.
Out.
i knew as soon as i walked out of the movie theater that this movie might have trouble connecting with people. it's not quite the traditional horror movie, not quite sci-fi or fantasy. and, uh, don't think about the plot too hard. it might unravel on you. on the other side though, there are a lot of spiritual connections and fodder for discussion with this movie.
i loved the vision of hell, in that it recalled the "brimstone and hellfire" kind of hell of our pre-modern era.
OF COURSE you need the hip night club. you need it to fit in that extra bit of hip music.
Xcuse me if I go "holy-roller" on y'all, but I have to share my heart.(Slight spoilers included)
I, too, was not impressed by this film at all. The first scene with the girl and the mirror was pretty exciting, but the rest wasn't really "all that".
What really bothered me was the fact that our hero never made his peace with God. I think this would have been a more powerful and effective film had Constantine been humbled to the point where he realized that God was the only one who could bail him out of this situation. Perhaps a scene reminiscent of Jacob wrestling with God and then God healing him... as opposed to the other guy healing him...would have sealed the deal for me.
Films like this tend to get on my nerves. They spend all this time and CGI presenting Satan and Hell as forces to be reckoned with but God and Heaven don't get the same treatment. While Satan is rightfully displayed as evil, however, there's still a certain measure of "awesomeness" surrounding his portrayal. I just wish filmmakers weren't afraid to give that same measure to the One Who is more awesome than Satan himself.
But that's just me...
i actually thought that it was a smart play on their part to not try and do a depiction of God. it kind of gave the impression that He was too awesome to depict.
i thought constantine wrestled with God the entire movie, and it wasn't until he accepted the notions of not being able to work through his own efforts, and sacrifices himself, that he finds peace with God. but i see what you're saying about the message being more "clean" (read: clear), with a greater humbling, but that's also part of the charm of constantine.
this movie may not be a "great" movie, but look at how much discussion it has already generated. i think that is the true strength of this movie.
I find it interesting that you say that this film 'was easily the most theologically rich movies I have seen in a long time', (I guess you didn't say 'good theology') because a recent Constantine review on CrossWalk.com thought otherwise:
The most overwhelming problem with this film is its theology, which undergirds the storyline at every point. ...They even noted the misrepresentation the film made on the Christian teaching about suicide:
Another major problem is the film's teaching that those who commit suicide are relegated to Hell. This is not a side note in "Constantine," but a major premise, because this is the only way that characters can go back and forth between the natural and the spiritual realms. [snipped] However, the teaching about suicide as the unforgivable sin is not Protestant, Roman Catholic or Orthodox teaching. It is not Biblical at all, although many believe that it is (and as such, it has perhaps saved many from attempting it, although definitely for the wrong reason).(Note: I have snipped out some text.)
In all honesty, I have not seen the film, but I think the CrossWalk review provided a better analysis of the film from a theological viewpoint (which I hoped I would get from Hollywood Jesus) so I think I'll give the cinema version a miss and maybe check out this movie when it hits the video store or TV.
This movie is steeped in Catholic understanding regarding spiritual matters. It's definitely not a Protestant perspective. I have nothing against Catholicism, but filmmakers often use that as their spiritual blueprint when it comes to films like this.
"theologically rich" does not mean "theologically accurate."
there are a lot of theological touchpoints with this movie that are great conversation starters. one of which, for me, is "do you think that is what hell is like?" i'll start that conversation with christian and non-christian alike, and challenge each.
Let's also remember that these artists are creating characters and stories based on their own perceptions of who God is. I've said this in many different forums but, lately, the basis of many recent action films have dealt with the main characters' wrestling with God. These wrestling matches are the result of loss and suffering that these characters blame on God. We see the same wrestling matches going on in real life.
I think that the best approach for us who see these films is not to merely pick them apart because of their lack of sound and accurate theology but rather, as Maurice suggests, to juxtapose what we see on film against what we know from Scripture. Perhaps, by bridging the gap between those two thought processes, we can lead folks to a clearer understanding of who God truly is.
I haven't seen the film either... I think I will now after reading these reviews. As a Christ-follower and minister, I just want to thank you, Maurice, for your faith that is so evident in your writings. I appreciate that, and I appreciate the way you have chosen to interact with culture instead of hiding from it and critiquing it from the hilltop. Only through folks like you will Hollywood ever become a tool for Christians to share the truth. Thanks.
Kevin B.
my wife and I saw this movie about two hours ago and I am still a little confused about what happened in the last 15 minutes of the film. These are some of the questions that we were tossing around...why does Gaberial turn into a human? How and why does Satan pull Constantine back from heaven? Why does God seemingly turn His back on Gaberial? etc. If we could get some help with these questions it would be much appreciated
this might be a little late but
***SPOILERS ALERT***
the way that i took things was that God judged Gabriel for his/her actions. Gabriel was jealous of humans so God made him/her one.
Constantine was dying, from his self-inflicted wounds and from his cancer. Satan healed him in order to allow him to keep on living and thus have an opportunity to screw up enough to end up in hell again.
***END SPOILERS***
like i said, the movie gets a little sloppy in the story that it's telling, but it's a great conversation starter.
When Bernardo Bertolucci directed 1993's Little Buddha, I'm sure he did some research on the topic of Buddhism so that he didn't make many blunders by misrepresenting the teachings of the religion. Why isn't the same courtesy extended to Christian themes?
"This movie is steeped in Catholic understanding regarding spiritual matters. It's definitely not a Protestant perspective. I have nothing against Catholicism..."
It's not a Catholic perspective either. I have nothing against Jews but... I have nothing against homosexuals but... I have nothing against Christians but I'm willing to falsely attribute things to them.
for other reivews see www.movieministry.com or
www.promontoryartists.org/lookingcloser
"It's not a Catholic perspective either. I have nothing against Jews but... I have nothing against homosexuals but... I have nothing against Christians but I'm willing to falsely attribute things to them."
My comments weren't intended to "falsely attribute things" to anyone! The character in the film who seeks Constantine's help is Catholic and she speaks extensively about her Catholic upbringing in the movie. Therefore I gathered that the film was coming from a Catholic slant. Sorry if I made an erroneous assumption. :o(
I guess I feel this is an important movie in that it strikes up the hunger for ultimate questions. It doesn't make any conclusions, but I feel that is a place where Christians can fill in the blanks. I read that even Keanu has reconsidered his beliefs areound Heaven and hell because of this movie. That is a great curiosity that I think very few sermons can produce. I can see people walking out of this movie comtemplating the reality of hell and demons and the devil. "You should believe in him, because he believes in you."
I just wanted to say I stumbled across your review of Constantine during an idle Saturday morning blog trawl. You're an excellent writer, a top reviewer. You have produced a refreshingly ego-free piece despite the fact that reviewers by definition need to access their own opinions in order to actually review. Many of them get their egos involved and the results are just too specific and too indulgent for my taste. Yours was sufficiently robustly written, intelligent and informative to make me want to see this film now. So thank you for a positive morning read.
Without seeing the film I can't judge Keanu's performance but I'm a fan of the Matrix series and the oft-forgotten My Own Private Idaho. I think, under the right tutelage as it were, he isn't too bad. Having said that, I'd love to see James Marsters return to public prominence. His role as Spike in BtVS demonstrated he has almost limitless potential to take on charismatic monstrous roles.
Thanks again. Have a great weekend.
Andy x
I've been looking forward to seeing this film. I love stories like this, and I also like Keeanu, after reading the review I'm even more interested. Sometimes, as a believer, I feel guilty for sitting through some of the movies I enjoy...don't think I have to feel quilty about this one.
Maurice:
If Alan Moore is a "comics deity"..... (a strange word for a professed Christian to allow himself to use about another mere mortal, by the way! I am not a Christian - any more, being finally sickened away from it by the ubiquitous right-wing element - though I am baptised, and therefore daresay that in some way, unless I choose to worship another supernatural divinity, which I do not, I will always be a Christian myself, in a way. (That's why I've stuck around a bit and explored this site, after my original intent of going in, leaving my comment, and getting straight out!!) Anyway, as for Christianity as a cultural construct, I personally like Dion Fortune's ideas on the subject.
But anyway, if Alan MOORE is a "deity", of any sort, including and especially that of a writer in the comic book medium - I think that just goes to show how FAR the comic book medium has FALLEN in the past couple of decades - rather than going through some sort of a renaissance, as its aficionados and propagandists would have you believe!!! (The sales figures overall say otherwise, however.)
If there's a "Moore" that you wish to "worship" as a "deity", I'd far rather recommend MICHAEL Moore, for example!! Now that guy - well, let's say he's a true Christian, in intent and everything that matters.
As for you, Kevin Miller - describing someone as "a rare breed - someone who is as well versed with Hellblazer and the writings of Alan Moore as you are with the gospel of Christ" - KEVIN - DO these two so "disparate" elements, as you (thankfully!) admit they are, deserve to be mentioned in the same BREATH??
Hellblazer and Christ together, in a pig's eye!!
language is a funny thing. i use the word "deity" in the small "g" sense of the word god, since alan moore is indeed held as a revered figure of fanboy worship.
i am curious about what you mean when you say that you aren't a christian anymore, yet are christian in your own way.
one of the difficult things for many christians to do is engage culture in meaningful ways. the stance that many choose to take is to retreat from "the world" that way our spirituality won't be corrupted by disparate elements.
we don't choose to do that. we believe that our faith has to be culturally relevant. going with your michael moore example. how does one live out one's faith and convictions, and help others move along in so doing?
a friend of mine said that this is a perpetual challenge in any culture. the gospel must be culturally relevant or it will not gain a hearing. since all cultures possess negative elements, the gospel must also challenge the culture. there is a fine-line between a culturally-captive and a culturally-relevant gospel.
language is a funny thing. i use the word "deity" in the small "g" sense of the word god, since alan moore is indeed held as a revered figure of fanboy worship.
i am curious about what you mean when you say that you aren't a christian anymore, yet are christian in your own way.
one of the difficult things for many christians to do is engage culture in meaningful ways. the stance that many choose to take is to retreat from "the world" that way our spirituality won't be corrupted by disparate elements.
we don't choose to do that. we believe that our faith has to be culturally relevant. going with your michael moore example. how does one live out one's faith and convictions, and help others move along in so doing?
a friend of mine said that this is a perpetual challenge in any culture. the gospel must be culturally relevant or it will not gain a hearing. since all cultures possess negative elements, the gospel must also challenge the culture. there is a fine-line between a culturally-captive and a culturally-relevant gospel.
Oh, Maurice, it's easy! To be a "Christian in one's own way!" At least, no major mental contortions are involved. Read Dion Fortune on the subject. Witch, psychoanalyst, and consummate respectable spiritual agony auntie. She'll tell you. Her books will, because she's long since passed over!
I can't be a Christian Christian any more, because I can't any more attend church with any serious intent, nor can I be a member of any church community. I have tried. Relatively recently! It has not worked for me. I finally saw why - I was trying to do the wrong thing, altogether. The politics of nearly all churches - all near me anyway, are simply too backward, as are their doctrines which have social import, such as on marriage, gays etc.
All "major religions" are anyway too male-centred. Well they worship a male deity - who is supposed to have made this and that, birthed this and that, without the assistance of a female - where does this happen in nature??
Oh yes, and when he comes down to earth, he is so territorial, that this time, no male is involved!
Sigh!
If I get annoyed with Marxism for being male-centred - and Freudianism - which I do - I think it's all 19th-century and needs updating - think how IRKSOME my inner psyche must find the ULTIMATE male-with-beard perception of the Infinite!!
Anyway, I KNOW they don't want me, because when I was "up for it", I tried to get confirmed - which both Anglicans and Methodists, and Lutherans, and various Protestant sects, not just Catholics, do. And none of them would do it! The Anglicans, and the Methodists were in the end, not interested in having me. I could see that. Anyway, I did ask. The United Reformed lot would have had me.... but the fashion in THAT church, because it was more evangelist, was to do adult baptisms - which I don't believe in when the person has been baptised before! I have!!
So as far as I'm concerned, THIS LOT haven't got their own ceremonies and rules sorted out, as far as getting "new recruits" and training them and bringing them in from the fringe to the "inner party" is concerned!!
I wouldn't join a political party that was so confused!
And as for the evangelists, they just want to dunk one like a biscuit!!
How does Michael Moore live out his faith and convictions? Well, he spends large sections of his books slagging off the hypocrisies of Christian religion, on anything from masturbation to gay sex to contraception - their fear of all three!!
And the economic and social hypocrisies of such as Bush. (For his work THERE I think of him as the crusading archangel Michael, who I hope very much will succeed in vanquishing the dragon of reaction and casting out the devil of unregulated capitalism!)
Michael remembers what the nuns used to teach him in school, about "the least of those among us". Michael knows all those things that you wrote in your posts after your review of "Hotel Rwanda".
Michael probably doesn't really call himself a Catholic - except I know he IS, still one - 1) because he admits - and it is more like "admits" still attending Mass! 2) My stepsister was Catholic, lapsed, and she explained it to me. Once a Catholic, always a Catholic. ESPECIALLY if you went to Catholic school/and or were brought up as one. It has SUCH a hold on your psyche, on that of most Catholic schooboys and girls, for their ENTIRE lives... It's an entire system of thought, like Marxism!
It's very hard to recover from! Madonna would agree!
As I don't believe we have THAT much freedom of choice in our beliefs, feelings and so on and so forth... they're all intimately related and SUCH a lot has to do with upbringing and chance...
Well, so I believe that your religion is AS MUCH about where you've been as where you are.
That's it, basically. Liz Kaspar's common sense guide to religion!!
friken hell Liz the Brit get it off your chest, I bet you feel much better for that!
Hi, I'm an Orthodox Chrisitan. I saw this movie long time back.
I have a Q about this movie. Recently a muslim friend of mine told me that the movie 'Constantine' was made by Jews in order to defame the arch-angel Gabriel. I find such a commend silly that the jews are behind this movie. I have been trying to find out if this true by some personal research but I found none. So I came across this website and thought of posting my Q.
Hope you could enlighten me over this matter. God bless you.
Thanks and regards.
Vinod Varghese
Malaysia.
you can check the internet movie database (www.imdb.com) to find a list of credits of everyone associated with the movie.
practically speaking, however, there aren't but a couple of well known angels: lucifer, gabriel, and michael. so those are going to be the ones used that have any pull with the public consciousness.
you can check the internet movie database (www.imdb.com) to find a list of credits of everyone associated with the movie.
practically speaking, however, there aren't but a couple of well known angels: lucifer, gabriel, and michael. so those are going to be the ones used that have any pull with the public consciousness.
Post a Comment
<< Home