Sunday, May 30, 2004

Troy

LINKS
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections


Click to enlargeTroy is one of several sweeping, historical epics that probably went into pre-production the moment Gladiator’s first weekend box office receipts came in. Other upcoming releases in this genre include King Arthur, Oliver Stone’s Alexander (based on the life of Alexander the Great), and Hannibal the Conqueror (with Vin Diesel in the lead role). Like the spate of World War II movies that Saving Private Ryan kicked off a few years ago, this group of films will likely include one or two shining specimens of cinematic excellence (such as Terence Malick’s The Thin Red Line) and a number of wannabes and “also rans.� Unfortunately for Brad Pitt and co., Troy gets things off to a rough start. Even though the theme of Troy is the importance of doing something that will be remembered for eternity, I doubt if this movie will be remembered much longer than the time it takes to end its theatrical run and begin its release on DVD.

Click to enlargeThe main problem with Troy is exactly what made Gladiator work: casting. I suspect that if several of the relatively unknown actors who fill out the minor roles in Troy switched places with the A-listers who were supposed to carry this film, Troy would have had far more emotional depth than it has. That’s because in virtually every instance, the lesser-known actors upstage their better-paid peers, conveying an emotional intensity that goes far beyond anything the Hollywood hunks have to offer. Perhaps the only A-lister I wouldn’t replace is Eric Bana (Hector). But even he is no Russell Crowe.

Click to enlargeThe person who needed to match Crowe’s intensity and charisma—Brad Pitt (Achilles)—is a particularly weak point. Regrettably, he’s also the star. There’s an old saying that you can only lead others as far as you’ve gone yourself. As I watched Pitt struggle to express feelings of anger and grief, I wondered if he had ever really felt such things before, because most of what came across was either confusion or a ramped up parody of those emotions. He didn’t really lead me anywhere. Fortunately, he doesn’t have too many lines or long speeches in this film, so his effect on the overall story is minimized. But that doesn’t cover up for the gaping hole left by his character. This film desperately needs a hero with whom we can identify and root for. Eric Bana and Sean Bean (Odysseus) make a valiant effort to compensate for Pitt’s lack, but even though both actors deliver fine performances, two minor heroes does not a movie make.

Click to enlargeVisually speaking, Troy leaves nothing to be desired. The time period is recreated beautifully through stunning visual effects, realistic sets, and detailed costumes. With a budget of $176 million, Troy is a film that should look good, and it does. But audiences today are way beyond being “wowed� by such things. We’ve come to expect them as accoutrements to a good story, not a replacement for it. While I don’t think director Wolfgang Petersen is trying to pass off a sow’s ear as a silk purse here, there’s something about this overall production that rings hollow.

Click to enlargePerhaps that’s because there is so little to cheer for in this film. We have Paris (Orlando Bloom), a selfish young prince who allows his lust (sorry, I mean love) to carry his kingdom into war; Achilles, who is little more than a killing machine; Agamemnon (Brian Cox), a caricature of a petty dictator; Helen (Diane Kruger), who makes a couple attempts at heroism but backs out at the first opportunity; and Priam (Peter O’Toole), a doddering old king who has taken to heeding his soothsayer’s omens instead of his son Hector’s practical advice. We don’t really care about any of these people, because all of them are motivated by greed, lust, a desire for fame, and a half dozen other petty concerns. We go to movies to watch heroes rise above such things, not indulge them. We’re looking for hope, not yet another reminder about the perpetual state of war and conflict humankind has been in since time immemorial.

Click to enlargeBut perhaps that is the real power of this film—as a cautionary tale about where we will end up if we continue to allow our selfish desires to rule our actions. If you listen closely, you will find numerous lines that convey a not-so-subtle anti-war agenda lurking beneath this story, which happens to be about one of the most fabled battles of all time. “Imagine a king who fights his own battles,� Achilles says sardonically to Agamemnon right before heading off to war. “War is young men dying and old men talking,� he says later on, and, “Don’t waste your life following some fool’s orders.� Why all of this anti-war talk? Probably because the characters, particularly Achilles, realize they are nothing more than pawns in a game played by kings. War is just personal desires magnified to a national and international level. The best a pawn can hope for in such a game is a valiant death, one that will be remembered for all eternity. But it is a pitiful hope, really, because the one who achieves such a goal won’t be around to benefit from their notoriety. In the end, all that will be satisfied is the individual’s vanity, and then only for a moment. It reminds me of a line Christ once spoke, “What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?� (Mark 8:36)

During the opening shots of this film, Odysseus says all men are haunted by the vastness of eternity and their seeming insignificance in the face of it. As this film demonstrates, many great and terrible things have been done to overcome this fear. But in the end, it all comes down to a choice: Whom will we serve: God or self? That and only that will determine our standing in eternity. As the Apostle Paul says, “The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life� (Galatians 6:8). The choice is ours.

LINKS
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections

Tuesday, May 25, 2004

Raising Helen

LINKS
—Interview with Gary Marshall By David Bruce
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections

A SEXY MAN OF GOD!

If you haven’t been to church in a while, you would probably be surprised if I told you my pastor was a dashing, young clergyman who played hockey, had a sense of humor, didn’t get freaked out by people who rejected his beliefs, and regarded himself as an unabashedly “sexy man of God.� All that, and he was spiritual, too. Seriously, now: Could such a person exist?

If you are a regular churchgoer, you would probably be more surprised if I told you I had just seen a Hollywood film that featured just such a clergyman as a central character. What’s more, they didn’t turn him into a serial killer, a child abuser, an exorcist, a moral crusader, a hair-sprayed TV evangelist or a Ned Flanders-style nerd. This film actually took his faith seriously, and it didn’t jazz it up or dumb it down. His Christian commitment was merely one part of his otherwise ordinary life. Seriously, now: Could such a film exist?

It does, and it’s called Raising Helen. And whether you call yourself a Christian or not, I urge you to see it. Both funny and heartwarming (if a tad conventional), this film does a superb job of depicting current misunderstandings between the Church and the culture at large. It also demonstrates how such misunderstandings might be overcome; mainly through people on both sides of the spiritual divide realizing what we all have in common—our humanity—and using that as the basis for dialogue.

There is much to comment on in this regard, but I will restrict myself to two incidents. One is a scene where Helen tries to pass herself off as a Lutheran so Pastor Dan will allow her sister’s children to attend the Lutheran school he oversees as principal. Her approach is typical of those whose only impression of the Church is that of a harsh, judgmental institution bent on excluding and condemning wayward souls rather than welcoming them. Like a limbo dancer, Helen bends as far back as she can go, assuming the bar will only allow a few “chosen� individuals to wriggle beneath it. However, after listening to her obvious lies, Pastor Dan doesn’t disqualify her. In fact, he responds with the last thing most non-Christians would expect from someone in his position: humor. With a straight face, he tells Helen everything sounds fine. All the children have to do is fill out the application forms and take a blood test.

“Blood test?� Helen asks, smiling.

“Yes,� Pastor Dan says. “To make sure they’re Lutherans.�

Helen’s smile melts. She starts to scramble, claiming all three children are hemophiliacs; that they faint at the sight of blood...

Finally, Pastor Dan relents and tells her he’s joking.

Wait a minute: Joking? The guy with the collar? Come on, now…

Refreshingly, it turns out there is no bar. There’s no limbo contest, either. You don’t have to be anyone special to attend Pastor Dan’s school or his church. As he puts it, “There’s probably only fifty Lutherans in Queens anyway.�

That scene isn’t the only time Pastor Dan responds to Helen’s antics with humor. Despite her near total ignorance of the faith (she thinks “vespers� is a brand of scooter), he simply accepts her and her family for who they are. He even seems to enjoy them. And he never preaches at them. Well, almost never. The one time he does preach at Helen, he elicits exactly the same response the Church does every time it wags its finger at society: anger, resentment, and a rupture in their relationship.

Have you ever felt like Helen, like you had to “show your credentials� before you’d be accepted by the Church, like the Church was only there to condemn you rather than support you? If so, you are not the only one. And it’s a shame. As an institution founded on grace (which can be defined as “unmerited favor or kindness�), we Christians sometimes do a lousy job of exhibiting this core value. Too often, we have turned the Church into an exclusive club of “do gooders� instead of a place where all who are weary and burdened may find rest (Matthew 11:28). I want to apologize on behalf of Christians everywhere for this attitude, and I urge you to give us another chance.

Similarly, if you are a Christian, have you ever struggled to accept a culture or an individual that does not share your beliefs? If so, I urge you to reconsider the example of Christ. He made such a habit of hanging out with those whom the Church of his day despised that it was downright scandalous. As Jesus said of himself: “The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and “sinners�’� (Luke 7:34). Has anyone made a similar accusation about you lately?

Another aspect of Raising Helen that addresses the uncomfortable relationship between Church and culture is the issue of Pastor Dan’s sexuality. Coming from the glamorous world of Manhattan fashion, Helen has a difficult time seeing Pastor Dan as anything other than a kindly, spiritual authority. Never mind the fact that he’s a “normal� guy in every other respect—handsome, funny, athletic, and supremely nice. But sexy? Not a chance. Like many people today, Helen doesn’t want to even consider the fact that a religious man could also have some “below the collar� stirrings. Even Helen’s fifteen-year-old niece squirms at the thought. “That’s weird,� she says. I think Helen’s niece is speaking for many people here. Recent sexual abuse scandals involving spiritual authorities have caused a lot of discomfort when it comes to thinking about clergymen and sex. But is it still possible for someone to be both a man of God and a sexual being—in a healthy way, that is? Pastor Dan certainly thinks so. As he tells Helen, “I’m a sexy man of God, and I know it.� However, I think he may be a rare breed.

Never mind clergymen, I think most non-Christians have a difficult time reconciling sex with Christianity period. I think that’s partly because non-Christians often don’t receive a very positive line from the Church regarding sexuality. It’s usually a “don’t� message of some kind, as in “don’t look,� “don’t touch,� “don’t imagine�—aw, heck, just “Don’t do it!� (Except under carefully controlled conditions.) Sounds more like the “fear of sex� than the “joy of sex� to me.

But if God created everything, he must have created sex, too, right? So what did he intend for us to do with it? To enjoy it, surely. But how? And with whom? Non-Christians aren’t the only ones who have a difficult time answering such questions—or reconciling spirituality and sex, for that matter. I’m a Christian who has been in a committed marital relationship for the past seven years, and I sure haven’t got it worked out yet. I don’t think my wife has either. And neither have any of my friends. Some haven’t even worked out their sexual orientation yet. And I don’t think we’re much different than millions of other Christians in North America. Perhaps that’s why the Church has been so lousy at communicating with the rest of the world on this topic. We don’t really know what to tell them. That’s not to say Christianity doesn’t have a lot to contribute to this conversation. But to get at what that is, we need to lay down our insecurities and prejudices. We need to stop trying to defend our position and start figuring out why so few people are listening to what we have to say.

Raising Helen won’t change the world—or the Church. But it might just change a few minds. Despite what the critics are saying, I urge you to give both Raising Helen and the Church a chance. In each case, I think you will be both delighted and surprised. I know I was.

LINKS
—Interview with Gary Marshall By David Bruce
—Overview
—Trailers, Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections