Monday, June 06, 2005

Cinderella Man

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections


23.jpg (158 K)If ever there was a classic rendering of the American dream—little guy overcomes incredible odds to make it big—Cinderella Man is it. It has all the requisite components:
1) A virtuous underdog (former heavyweight boxing contender James J. Braddock) who has tasted success but has recently fallen on hard times,
2) a worldly-wise mentor (Braddock’s manager) who offers the hero one more chance for glory,
3) a corrupt system (the boxing commission) that the hero must overcome if he hopes to achieve his dream,
4) a faithful companion (Braddock’s wife) who inspires and supports the hero along the way,
5) a nefarious villain (heavyweight champion Max Baer) who represents everything the hero is not,
6) a community in desperate need of a hero (Depression-era New York), and
7) a final battle (the heavyweight title bout) in which the fate of the hero—and, by extension, the entire community—will be decided.

We’ve all seen this story countless times. Braveheart, Rocky, Gladiator, Jerry McGuire, Unforgiven, First Blood, Hoosiers, A League of Their Own, and Miracle are just a few titles that spring to mind, but there are dozens more. And if you look back even further, you can trace the origins of this “monomyth� through the history of film and literature, all the way back to the first stories ever told around a campfire or on a cave wall. Greek, Roman, Norse, Indian, Jewish—virtually all bodies of mythological literature contain this archetype. Considering this pedigree, I can’t help but wonder why we feel compelled to tell and re-tell this story over and over again. Sure, Cinderella Man is a masterful rendition of this myth. But do we really need to see it again?

20.jpg (125 K)Perhaps the best way to answer this question is through my own viewing experience. Cinderella Man is one of those rare films during which I found it extremely difficult to keep my critical faculties engaged. I was so emotionally involved in the story that I had to keep reminding myself it wasn’t real. Forget about the technical aspects of the production; I just wanted Braddock to win! Afterwards, I puzzled over why this was so. I could see why it was important for people during the Depression to pin their hopes on an everyman hero like Braddock. But why was it so important to me? Why—even though I knew the outcome—was I on the edge of my seat throughout the final bout? Do I feel repressed in some way? Or am I just that susceptible to suggestion, to nostalgia? I’m not sure. But I can think of several other reasons why Braddock’s journey and stories like it are important to me and everyone else.

First, stories like Braddock’s give us hope that, like him, we can also overcome the obstacles that hold us back. We can gain a measure of dignity and self-determination—if only to the point where we are able to choose the time and place of our ultimate defeat. We don’t have to give up and become victims or give in to the corruption that is all around us. Never mind that the film’s depiction of Braddock borders on hagiography. His journey reminds us that the good don’t always die young, and nice guys sometimes do finish first. When we’re tempted to compromise our morals for gain, we can reflect back on stories like this one and be inspired to continue pursuing the high and narrow path of virtue.24.jpg (194 K)

In a similar vein, stories like Cinderella Man remind us of what’s worth fighting for. Getting to the top isn’t all that matters. In fact, it may not matter at all. It’s the person you become along the way that counts. I find it interesting that even while such stories celebrate success, they tend to cast successful people in a negative light. For example, the boxing promoters—save for Braddock’s manager—are portrayed as a pack of money-grubbing opportunists. And the current heavyweight champion of the world, Max Baer, is like an early incarnation of Hugh Hefner—albeit with a lethal right hook. This begs a number of questions: Why the paradox? Does success always breed corruption? If so, how can the hero retain his virtue in the face of all the temptations victory brings? And how about us: Can we resist those same temptations on our own road to glory? If so, how?

What about the price of victory? Each time Braddock defeated an opponent, I couldn’t help thinking he was merely sending yet another man to the same relief line in which he had only recently been standing. We’re supposed to celebrate Braddock’s victory, because he is the hero of this film. But, as Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.� Just because the name of the guy at the top changes, that doesn’t mean the forces of evil that kept him down have been overcome. They just have a new victim to kick around. In boxing, as in any sport, when one person wins, someone else loses. How about in life? What can we do to ensure our own heroics don’t wind up victimizing others? Rather than focusing merely on our own journey, how can we ensure that the pursuit of our liberation also leads to the liberation of others? This is a crucial question made even more compelling by the rapidly shrinking nature of our global village. Today, when a butterfly flaps its wings in Asia, the movement truly is felt around the world. How about when you flap your wings, as it were? What kind of ripple effect are you creating?

Stories like Cinderella Man also teach us the importance of community. The community this film focuses on in particular is Braddock’s family. During a press conference when Braddock is asked what he is fighting for, his reply consists of one word: “milk.� When he was a younger man, a prouder man, Braddock was probably a lot more like Max Baer. He fought for all of the things our culture teaches us are important: money, fame, power, and happiness. But years of struggle have taught Braddock that all of those things are merely fleeting. What really matters are love, honor, faithfulness, perseverance, and the people who live right under his roof. Braddock is willing to sacrifice everything—even his life—to protect them, to set a good example for his kids. Perhaps the years of hardship were God’s way of preparing Braddock to handle the victory to come. Rather than destroy his family, as is so often the case, his quest for the title merely makes them stronger as they band together to support his pursuit.

44.jpg (109 K)Of course, Braddock’s effect on the wider community—indeed, the nation as a whole—is also central to this film. He became a hero not only to his family but also to his co-workers and to virtually every other person who felt like he or she had been cheated out of the “good life� by the Depression. Cinderella Man reminds us that we all live our lives on a stage. It doesn’t matter whether thousands of people are watching us or merely a handful. It is always important to strive for greatness, to be people of character. Just as Braddock’s life inspires us, our lives serve as an inspiration to others. Whether that inspiration is positive or negative depends upon the example we set.

Despite what I’ve said above, many critics will deride this film for its sentimental, simplistic version of reality. Many already have. But let’s not forget that the name of this film—Cinderella Man—is derived from a fairy tale. Even though such stories are not lauded for their literal representation of reality, we still love and need them, because they are true in a way that reality can never be.

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections

3 Comments:

Reviews by Mike Furches said...

Kevin, if the movie had truly represented history it would have been a better movie. I agree, Braddock was a good man, went through a lot to get to the place he needed to be and succeed, but, Ron Howard took far too many liberties with the true history of the situation. Truth is that Baer was not the animal the movie portrayed. His son Max Baer Jr. has been very outspoken about the revisionist history that Howard wrote. Truth is, that while Baer was an animal in the ring, he was no where near the person portrayed in the movie. After his bout where a man died, he lost 5 of his next 6 matches, and, he paid for the families funeral expenses and started a fund for the family. Also is the misrepresentation of Braddock himself.

Few people realize that he did not fight again until 2 years later, against Joe Louis. A fight he lost but also a fight where he required in the contract 15% of Lewis's earnings for every fight he would ever fight thereafter. Lewis paid up and honored the contract and did pay Braddock 15% of the earnings for every other fight he ever fought. Little tidbits conveniently left out of the movie to make the hero more appealing. The sad thing is, that even knowing that the story is still an appealing story, just too bad that the characters had to be made worse and better than they really were.

8:52 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Mike: Thanks for the info. I decided not to delve too much into the "real" story and take the film on its own terms. I suspected it was distorted, seeing as Max Baer seemed to come out of the general casting villains department, and Braddock was literally without fault. That raises a question: Why do we want such oversimplifications of reality? Is this driven by the filmmakers or the audiences? My suspicion is that we live in such uncertain times that all of us--not just the fundamentalists--are looking for someone to simplify things for us. Just a thought. Thanks again.

9:24 AM  
Liz the Brit said...

Hmm yes... and I think you should see how my "Marxist mentors" over at WSWS view it, again...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jun2005/cind-j16.shtml

David Walsh is more than a bit dismissive of this one again, because he... well, he basically makes the same remarks about Max Baer as you two above do.. though I didn't know that other bit about Braddock..

And anyway, doesn't the movie seek to POLITICALLY oversimplify, above all, and try to make the viewer "content" with the "status quo", however insufferable, as the Depression was? Doesn't the boxing movie set in contemporary times, "Million Dollar Baby", do much the same thing, but in OUR times... "certainly not social criticism" says David Walsh. Because both of these movies basically say how working class people should be content with their lot, they shouldn't necessarily expect life to rise above hardship and misery for most people... they shouldn't rebel against "the system" either individually or with their friends/fellow class members... In FACT, I think most recent sporting movies ARE along these lines... not like Golden Age Hollywood boxing movies, which could be much more radical, at a time when the industry was.

(Before McCarthy got to it and scared the pants off most of the American Left.

Did they have anything like him in Canada, Kevin?)

Anyway, I think the objectionable thing in the above movie is that Braddock has this friend, Wilson or whatever his name is, who is a dock worker, who believes in unions and worker militancy, whose views are brushed off by Braddock, and who comes to a bad end!!

Well - we can't all rely on winning large-money purses through boxing to ensure a financially OK life for ourselves.

So I would have thought that the other character was far more representative of the working class during the Depression. Anyway, they achieved BIG THINGS for the working class back then; in the Great Flint Sitdown Strike of 1937, which as Michael Moore will tell you, made great gains for its participants and their fellows, and turned the skilled working class in America's top industry, auto manufacture, into part of the better-paid middle class at a stroke.

MAY IT COME AGAIN!!

If we don't get complete socialism, that is.

1:08 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home