Monday, May 02, 2005

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

—Overview
—Photos
—About pdf
—Spiritual Connections


Click to enlargeI confess: I have never read The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. I have never listened to the original radio drama. I’ve never seen the TV mini-series. I’ve never read the comic book adaptation. And I have never played the video game. Hence, I wondered if I had any business even reviewing this film. Why not leave that task to the professionals?

But as I watched the movie, I began to think that perhaps I was wrong. Maybe I was the ideal person for the job, seeing as I was not distracted by issues that would have troubled the common fan, such as how faithful/unfaithful the film was to its previous incarnations. (None of which are faithful to each other, so I’m told.) Unlike the majority of viewers, I would be able to evaluate the film according to what it attempted to be—the drollest of droll outer space comedies, what Mel Brooks’ Spaceballs would have been had it been funny and made by the Brits. More to the point, however, I believe my ignorance also allowed me to see something in the film that I never expected to discover, something that may have escaped everyone’s attention until now. In short, I think I have discovered nothing less than The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Gospel. Let me explain.

Arthur Dent, the hero of this tale, is the everyman—so preoccupied by the trivialities of life that when the end comes, he is caught completely unaware. Never mind that plans for the demolition of his house have been on display for a year, and that plans for the destruction of Earth itself have been available for centuries.

22.jpg (53 K)Fortunately for Dent, he inadvertently saved the life of the one and only person who can rescue him from this impending calamity—Ford Prefect, an alien who came to earth to conduct research for his article in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. The Guide is the ultimate travel companion for the interstellar thumb-waggler, the back cover of which reads “Don’t Panic!� in bold, bright letters. At the last second, Prefect and Dent hitch a ride with the very creatures that are about to implode the planet—the evil Vogons, huge, slobbering, bureaucrats from hell. Thus begins a new phase of existence for Dent, who is so unprepared for the rapturous journey that he his is still in his pajamas.

Let’s pause a moment for reflection: Like Dent, all of us have been forewarned that the end of our individual lives—indeed, the end of the world—is an absolute certainty. However, also like Dent, most of us live in denial of this fact, so bound up in the mundane details of life that when the end comes, we are surprised, angry, and afraid. If we had looked into it, we would have seen that it was clear all along, and we could have taken appropriate action. As it stands though, most of us are more like the people Prefect and Dent meet in the bar just prior to lift-off: When the end finally arrives, we simply put bags over our heads, lie down on the floor, and hope for the best.

The good news is; if you form the right relationship before disaster befalls you (with Christ, for example, who, like Prefect, descended to earth and has the ability to save us), you can stand up, take the bag off your head, and face the end of the world and your own impending death with confidence. You will realize there is a life beyond the details, and you will be free to stick out your thumb and hitch a ride on the cosmic express when all is said and done.

Click to enlargeThrough Dent, we also learn that evil isn’t necessarily the big and scary thing horror movies would have us believe. Evil can also be found in the details, the small, barely discernable choices that slowly lead us off the narrow path and into the wilderness, blinding us to the machines of destruction that are right at our door. We become so set on maintaining the status quo, of satisfying our petty desires (all Dent really wants is a good cup of tea) that we rarely pause to wonder what it’s all about. Hence, life is reduced to a series of mundane tasks punctuated by brief moments of panic when we realize we might not complete those tasks on time. Eventually, these responsibilities can become like the Vogons, huge, ponderous things that threaten to crush us not with sheer strength or superior firepower but with the relentless, agonizing weight of bad poetry read with enthusiasm.

Thankfully, like Prefect, Christ has also contributed his own entry into the ultimate guide to the universe—the Bible—and his message is just as clear as the one on the back cover of the Hitchhiker’s Guide: “Don’t panic!� If you are face-to-face with evil, if life seems chaotic, if you’re drowning in details, if you can’t depend on anyone around you for help or answers, if you are all alone, if you are in any difficult situation whatsoever, don’t panic! Just refer to the guide, and it will show you the way out.

Continuing the analogy, after being sucked into space, Dent goes through a “life after death� experience of sorts. He is even transformed into a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17)—a sofa at one point, a doll made out of yarn at another. He also gets a taste of hell on board the Vogons’ ship, and he even gets to visit a new heaven (the spaceship “Heart of Gold,� where you need only think of what you most desire and it will appear), and a new earth (turns out the manufacturer created a spare). On the new earth, he is presented with a choice: resume his old life or continue to careen around the galaxy on a wild adventure in search of the ultimate question. To Dent’s credit, he turns his back on the familiar, realizing he was as good as dead anyway, and embraces the great unknown.

We are all faced with a similar choice: Persist down a road that we know leads to death (Ephesians 2:1), or turn away from it and embrace a life of adventure with Christ (Romans 6:23). It is a risky decision either way. But as Pascal pointed out in his famous wager, even if you think the probability of God’s existence is unlikely, the potential upside of believing far outweighs the consequences if you don’t believe and are wrong.

As much as I was amazed by all of these parallels (and there are several more I haven’t discussed) I was most impressed by the way this film deals with the answer to “life, the universe, and everything.� According to the supercomputer constructed solely to solve this mystery, the proper response is “42.� As it turns out, this answer doesn’t do anyone a whole lot of good though, because no one really knows what the ultimate question is. It’s like a nightmare version of Jeopardy.

The answer bothers Dent most of all, because the further he journeys through the galaxy, the more he realizes a number can’t possibly explain all that he is seeing, experiencing, and, most of all, feeling. The answer has to be something more. It has to be about a person, about relationship, about love. Is it a coincidence that he makes this discovery while flying around in a spaceship named “The Heart of Gold� that is captained by a man (Zaphod Beeblebrox) who has two heads, one supposedly controlled by reason and intellect and the other by emotion? I think not. I took this to be Adams’ way of saying that science, represented by the number “42,� certainly can tell us a lot about life, particularly the mechanics of how things work. But when it comes to “Why?� questions, questions of meaning, we must look for answers beyond the physical realm.

Unfortunately, many of us are like Zaphod. We are convinced that to answer such questions, we must first hive off part of our being, giving preference to either intellect or emotion rather than allowing them to work together. As Dent discovers though, Zaphod’s approach just leads to chaos. Only when we reunite the two halves of our being can we truly see and understand life, the universe, and everything in it. Once Dent makes this discovery, he finally finds the hope that has eluded him throughout the film. And that hope inspires him to defeat the Vogons, save the girl, and live happily ever after. The cool thing is, we can experience this same hope as well, if only we are willing to embrace the totality of our existence.

At the beginning of this film, the narrator notes that most things in life are not as they appear. I couldn’t agree more, particularly in terms of this movie. I have always assumed that the main attraction of the Hitchhiker series was its brilliant, satirical humor. However, after watching this film, I suspect that Adams’ appeal goes far beyond his penchant for absurdity and extends deep into his readers’ desire for answers to life’s ultimate questions. In Adams, they recognize a fellow seeker; one who realized that searching for answers is important, but that laughter is a crucial component to finding your way on life’s journey. Too bad his own journey was cut so short.

—Overview
—Photos
—About pdf
—Spiritual Connections

16 Comments:

Petri Tikka said...

"The cool thing is, we can experience this same hope as well, if only we are willing to embrace the totality of our existence." This is no true, because law or fulfilling conditions and commandments cannot bring us to God. Even the first covenant only promised earthly promise for obedience. But that obedience was and remains impossible for men.

"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." (Eph 2: 8, 9). So simple is the gospel, a simple child can understand it. God is Love and the Holy Spirit is a Gift. You must differentiate between SIMPLE faith and COMPLEX decision (because it involves two active subjects).

But this seems completely impossible for you guys here at Hollywood Jesus, or for that matter, almost anywhere else. I'm very, very sad about this. But the Spirit of God is effective everywhere the Word is. And so with this Christian site also. I bless you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

Happy Ascension Day!

11:48 AM  
mandelbrotjulia said...

Sigh...why can't people learn to respect different points of views? Why is it that the stereotypical religious person always has to be on that "nobody 'gets it' but me!" kick?

I am an agnostic, but I really enjoy reading all of the reviewers' points of views on Hollywood Jesus. I get thought-provoking reviews that I just can't seem to find anywhere else, save for those deep discussions with a few close friends.

So I just want to say thank you for sharing your perspective.

1:01 PM  
Tom Price said...

Fantastic review Kevin!! I love your writing style...and it is so refreshing to read good writing. The movie aside, it's just nice to laugh and smile at some of the things you say. :) Thanks for brightening my otherwise dreary day today. It's been a rough week.

Melinda Ledman

7:54 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Kenny & Melinda: Thanks for the encouragement!

Petri: I'm not completely sure what you mean in your comment, but if you're trying to imply that I'm saying you can earn your salvation, you've misunderstood me.

What I'm saying is, people tend to think they have to follow either their heart or their mind if they hope to find truth. I'm saying that both the heart and the mind are valid means to arrive at truth, and that they function best when used together. The truth about the universe is both a fact and a feeling.

9:24 PM  
Petri Tikka said...

Kenny Wright, I am not saing that I´m the only person who "gets" it. It´s not about "getting" it, it´s about faith. It does not need to have anything to do with understanding (which makes one proud). Besides, I believe thar lots of people do "get" it, in all kind of Christian settings. That´s what my last sentences implied. But it seems to be most clearly articulated in the Lutheran tradition.

I don´t see any point in "respecting" different views. Views don´t have feelings, but people do. It is immoral to respect unhelful views, because they are harmful to the person´s spirit. For instance, to respect racism is not nice at all. We should tolerate all kinds of people, not all kinds of oppinion.

Kevin, I don´t think you believe that you can earn you salvation. And that is great. But your words do seem to imply that one can accept salvation and so be saved. This is a typical American "evangelical" view that is really not in harmony with the simplicity of the Gospel.

Both fact and feeling are indeed part of the totality of human existence, so neither should be discarded in evaluating reality. But heart and mind cannot be used to find the wholeness of truth. That is completely above human comprehension and ability to feel. The truth is in life itself which gives both mind and heart their power. Life is given by the Spirit through the good news of Jesus Christ.

Again, happy Holy Thursday!

5:42 AM  
Kevin Miller said...

Petri,

You present somewhat of an anomaly to me, because you say, "But heart and mind cannot be used to find the wholeness of truth. That is completely above human comprehension and ability to feel." And yet you seem to both think and feel that you know what the truth is and how it may be found.

9:49 AM  
Petri Tikka said...

Kevin,

Yes, it does indeed seem illogical. But it becomes understandable when one considers the possibility that truth may be lived. I can tell you about that life in the truth and give it to you through the gospel, but I cannot explain it to you nor tell you how to find it. Because it simply IS. There's no need to find it.

I understand what the truth is about, but I do not understand truth itself. I feel what the truth does, but I do not feel truth itself. Yet in these understandings and feelings lies through faith in the Word a seed of ultimate understanding and feeling unhindered.

We shall never understand God, because he is infinite and eternal. But we can live in him and do live in him when we are baptized in the Name and believe in the Name. And at the final coming of Jesus we shall understand all of the truth.

1:57 PM  
Anonymous said...

I'm afraid that I must take strong objection to your mischaracterization of Adams' position on science. Adams was a well known advocate for science, as well as a scourge of all religious, supernatural, or otherwise irrational beliefs about the universe. A simple Google search would return such statements as the following (taken from an interview at www.americanatheist.org/win98-99/T2/silverman.html):

"I was extremely doubtful about the idea of god, but I just didn’t know enough about anything to have a good working model of any other explanation for, well, life, the universe and everything to put in its place. But I kept at it, and I kept reading and I kept thinking. Sometime around my early thirties I stumbled upon evolutionary biology, particularly in the form of Richard Dawkins’s books The Selfish Gene and then The Blind Watchmaker and suddenly (on, I think the second reading of The Selfish Gene) it all fell into place. It was a concept of such stunning simplicity, but it gave rise, naturally, to all of the infinite and baffling complexity of life. The awe it inspired in me made the awe that people talk about in respect of religious experience seem, frankly, silly beside it. I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day. "

You are free to paste any such analogy as pleases you onto your reading of Adam's work, but please do take the time to understand his point of view.

Sincerely,
Will

2:52 PM  
Jana C.H. said...

I have to agree with Anonymous that Kevin's interpretation of "Hitchhiker's Guide" is completely contrary to Douglas Adams's own ideas. I see all the various incarnations of HHGTTG as profoundly anti-religious, though the movie is probably the least so, largely because it's less chaotic and the plot comes to an actual resolution.

But that's the beauty of a fine work of art-- it can be interpreted in many ways, including ways never intended by the artist. For example, Tolkien's mythology, which he considered profoundly Christian (I'm talking about the books) has been embraced with joy by the Neo-pagans.

Kevin, I'm a skeptic and see the film entirely differently from you, but I find your interpretation interesting. Taken on its own terms, it holds water.

Jana C.H.
Seattle
Saith Floss Forbes: If you don't know the tune, sing tenor.

10:47 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Anonymous/Jana,

Thanks for the input. Even though I've never read Adams, I do know that he claimed to be a religious skeptic or at least an agnostic. Perhaps I should have noted that in the review. However, after watching this film, I couldn't help but think he was a closet Christian. The pieces just fit together far too perfectly. Had I not known anything about Adams prior to viewing this film, I would have sworn he was a Christian after viewing it.

Now I am very eager to read his works so I can continue to test that hypothesis. Wouldn't it be the greatest joke of all if he actually was a Christian but hid that fact within his work for those who were able to find it? I doubt that it is true, but it is a nice thought. Depending on your perspective, I guess... :)

K

6:27 AM  
mandelbrotjulia said...

Petri,

"But this seems completely impossible for you guys here at Hollywood Jesus, or for that matter, almost anywhere else."
"Besides, I believe thar lots of people do "get" it, in all kind of Christian settings."

Uh, which one is it? To choose them both you contradict.

"It´s not about "getting" it, it´s about faith. It does not need to have anything to do with understanding (which makes one proud)."

I actually agree with this, which is one of the many reasons why I could never be Christian. We have brains for a reason, and it's not for zombies to eat them.

"I don´t see any point in "respecting" different views."

Ofcourse you don't - hence the "I'm the only one who gets it" attitude that I spoke of earlier. What does racism have to do with Kevin's interpretation of the Gospels anyway? You don't get points for trying to prove your point with something that has nothing to do with the discussion. What we're talking about is two people reading the exact same book and coming up with two different interpretations of it. I'm asking why you insist that yours is the superior perspective?

11:42 PM  
Petri Tikka said...

Dear Kenny,

You don't seem to understand me because you measure my views on different views as if they were absolute. Views aren't absolute, people aren't identical with their views. That is why I can say that lot of people get it in the very core of their personality, even though they don't get it intellectually. But that is only possible within the context of the Gospel - ie. the effective Word of God.

The mind does indeed exist for a reason, the reason being to evaluate different things and survive in the world. But the question is that facts are above reason, because reasoning should be based on facts. Fact alway preceeds reasoning. That is why I find agnostism and atheism intellectually rather ungrounded.

You do not, of course, answer my arguements about why different views shouldn't necessarily be respected. But to say that I stated that I am the only one who gets it or even implied such a thing is completely untrue. I do not respect other views - ergo, I am the only one who is right? That doesn't make sense.

Racism doesen't have anything to do with Kevin's interpretation of the Gospel. If you would just read the context, you would notice that I never implied that. The context is this: racism is a view - not to be respected because it is hurtful - so why is it such an absolute to respect different views?

Let's use a simile - I read your text and figure that you are a Christian. Of course, that's blatantly false, cf. "...I could never be Christian." Similarly - I read the Bible and figure that you are saved by a deciding yourself. Of course, that's blatanly false, cf. "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." (Eph 2: 8, 9).

But both the Bible passage and your words can be stretched to something opposite - if you put something there that isn't there. Just try it. You will find that it isn't that difficult.

There are limits to interpretation, that's what I'm saying... Not that my perspective is supperior!

3:09 AM  
Anonymous said...

"Arthur Dent, the hero of this tale, is the everyman—so preoccupied by the trivialities of life that when the end comes, he is caught completely unaware. Never mind that plans for the demolition of his house have been on display for a year, and that plans for the destruction of Earth itself have been available for centuries."


This analogy doesn't make sense-the plans for earth's destruction were on alpha centauri. The plans for his house's destructon were stored on the bottom of a locked file cabinet in a bathroom in the basement of the plans office. The doorway to the bathroom held a sign saying beware of the leopard, and the stairs were out.


I suppose you could stretch to mean an analogy for the bible's message of the apocalypse with no evidence to back it up. That would also jive better with his background.


And yes, douglas adams pretended to be an Atheist so he could be shunned by a large portion of the religious population. riiight.

"He is even transformed into a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17)—a sofa at one point, a doll made out of yarn at another."

This was added to the movie, and was not in the books.

"He also gets a taste of hell on board the Vogons’ ship, and he even gets to visit a new heaven (the spaceship “Heart of Gold,� where you need only think of what you most desire and it will appear),"
uhhhh....no. The vogon ship is in no way hell, and where did you pull that parenthesized(SP) part from? That wasn't anywhere in the movie, book, television series, or radio edition.




"On the new earth, he is presented with a choice: resume his old life or continue to careen around the galaxy on a wild adventure in search of the ultimate question. To Dent’s credit, he turns his back on the familiar, realizing he was as good as dead anyway, and embraces the great unknown."

This was also added. It's a bit i rather didn't like, as it goes against the whole feel of hitchhiker's guide.

Your analogies are really strained. If you want to understand the hitchhiker's guide, you must first experience it in at least two forms of media.

4:25 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Anonymous:

I expected such a die-hard Douglas Adams fan to have a better sense of humor! Sorry if I trampled all over one of your heroes!

A few comments:

1) Of course I don't really believe Douglas Adams pretended to be an atheist. I just thought it would be the ultimate joke.

2) I realize some of my analogies are popping their buttons, but I never went in to the film looking for direct parallels. However, when I saw one, others started to appear. Then I decided to simply interpret the film on a symbolic level, and this is what I came up with. I wasn't really concerned with making my review jive with other incarnations of the story, seeing as I've never read/listened to/or watched them. I was responding to the film only, not the other versions, so comments about what was and what was not in the film really aren't relevant to my review. That said, Adams wrote the majority of the screenplay. He even added things that weren't in the books. So obviously, this script captured a substantial portion of his vision for the piece.

3) On the Heart of Gold, all you had to do was stick your head in the food machine, wish for something, and it would appear. Thus, my comment.

4) Finally, I really do want to understand the H2G2 and Adams better, so I do plan to read the books soon. Thanks for your gentle prodding!

10:49 PM  
Rory Schussler said...

Just wanted to comment and share my opinions. Your article was quite interesting, for all of the many reasons listed above relating to Adam's personal life. I am an Atheist myself, but I don't hold the objection some do to the beliefs of others. It is a matter of perspective and everyone's own personal journey, wherever it may lead them. The fact that you can see the H2G2tG in a context of christian spiritualism is truly a testament to our own philosophical adaptability. After all, it was a line from a C.S. Lewis book that started me on the path of theological liberalism.

Although the books are much more anti-religious than the movie, almost mercilessly so at times, they can still be interpreted different ways. For example, here is a paraphrase about the Babel fish, which appeared in the movie. "The Babel fish's truly amazing nature has caused many to believe that it must have been consciously created, and thus that God must not exist. The argument goes like this.
God: I exist only by faith
Philosopher: But the babel fish obviously proves your existance. Thus by your own words, you cannot exist.
God: Oops, I hadn't thought of that. *poof*"

On the surface this is an obvious jab at creationism, but it can also be read several other ways. I take it myself to mean that the details and specifics of God are not important. What is important is if your relationship with him causes you to be a better person, and the issues of how this all came to be and whether or not the messenger was truly divine are not what really needs to be focused on. Thank you for listening, once again I'm glad to have discovered your point of view.

3:24 PM  
Kevin Miller said...

Rory: Thank you for sharing your point of view. I found this line of your comment particularly interesting: "the details and specifics of God are not important. What is important is if your relationship with him causes you to be a better person, and the issues of how this all came to be and whether or not the messenger was truly divine are not what really needs to be focused on." I think you're right on the money here. Too often we get our knickers in a knot over who's right and who's wrong. However, as the film "Kingdom of Heaven" illustrates so clearly, if we keep focusing on our differences, we're just going to wind up killing each other. Rather than go around trying to tell everyone what to believe, I'm more an advocate of actually trying to live out my beliefs. There's not better testimony than a transformed life.

A question: You claim to be an atheist, and yet your comment above seems to indicate some sort of belief in God. Are were you merely referring to people's constructs of God? In other words, as long as people's constructs of God make them better people, that's what matters--whether or not their constructions are true or not.

8:30 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home