The Da Vinci Code (Paperback)
Author: Dan BrownCategory: Fiction
Publisher: Anchor
Format: Paperback
Pub Date: March 2006
Price: $7.99
ISBN: 978-1-4000-7917-9
MORTIFICATION OF THE FICTION
Early in life, I was taught the dictum, “Don’t believe everything you read.� After reading The DaVinci Code three times now, I am appalled at the way a work of fiction has become such an iconoclastic point of contention around the planet. As the book appears in paperback this week and is about to be screened around the world by Sony Pictures in May, there has been a resurgence of interest in a story that should have remained just a really good and quick read—made for a rainy Saturday afternoon and a good pot of coffee—but has been turned into one of the new icons of spiritual re-education.
The most shocking thing about this is that Dan Brown can laugh all the way to the bank and probably has… repeatedly! In taking bits and pieces of ideas he has gleaned from his hobby of pursuing conspiracy theories found on the Internet and in the books of other unsubstantiated “historians,� he has perpetrated the biggest hoax on the reading public in a long time. He is one very smart cookie, is Dan Brown. He knows that the average reader will swallow whatever he says because he begins with two stated “Facts.� As soon as that word is read, the mindset is altered. Suddenly, there is a rat in every corner and it is easier to believe that a conspiracy of silence exists and that Christianity is purely a manipulation of male chauvinists, than to try to prove that it does not.
Someone might Google in key words or phrases like, Opus Dei, Priory of Sion, Sir Leigh Teabing, mortification of the flesh, silice, Fibonacci Sequence, or hidden meanings in DaVinci artworks, and they will find an astounding amount of information. This will satisfy most to the point that they believe what Brown proposes must be true and that he has really done an outstanding job of research; but they won’t read enough to see that the sources are repetitive, inconclusive, and do very little to satisfy the thirst for more information—because there is no more. What has happened in The DaVinci Code is that Dan Brown began writing a mystery but got so carried away with his own obsession with the conspiracy theories which tantalize him, that he tried to turn fiction into historical fact. It doesn’t work because none of these theories can be documented. All of the people involved in promoting the conspiracies found in Brown’s book quote from each other in the books they have written. Eventually, if you do enough research, you find that the person or persons who originated the ideas in the first place are long dead and have left no tangible proof—like a parchment, a scroll, a letter, etc.—of what they claim. All we are left to sift through are circular arguments among a small group of people who like to think they are scholars, but are perpetuating their own “facts� based purely on hearsay. Robert Langdon sums up the theme of the entire novel —“Everyone loves a conspiracy.�
For instance, worship of the feminine and worship of nature existed long before the birth of Christianity. Mankind has always fallen prey to the temptation of worshipping the seen rather than the unseen, that which is the created thing instead of the Creator. Long before Constantine came onto the historical stage, Hebrew worship banned and obliterated the worship of gods, goddesses, and nature because they were commanded to do so by Yahweh, the One True God. Christianity before Constantine had female leaders such as Mary Magdalene, who was a disciple of Jesus and the first to see him in his resurrected body; Lydia, who was tutored by the apostle Paul and probably founded the first Christian church in Philippi; the daughters of Philip, who were prophetesses; and Dorcas (or Tabitha), who was such an important disciple in Joppa that God miraculously raised her from the dead through Peter. The Bible clearly supports equal standing between men and women. It is mankind that has allowed the perversion and misapplication of God’s word because of man’s desire to become all-powerful and godlike.
Much that is shameful throughout history has been justified in the name of God and Christianity, but that has no correlation with God’s will as stated in the Bible. The important thing to note is that there are over 20,000 pieces of existing documentation that justify the existence of what is in the Bible. To date, the people who debate the truth of the theories found in The DaVinci Code have not been able to produce one. Every religion—even denominations within Christianity—have traditions that have no basis in scripture but have superceded God’s word and given direction and justification to doctrine and practice. Some are so old that no one really knows how or why they came about anymore.
Aside from the spiritual, Dan Brown has some talent for turning a phrase and plotting out a story but, at least in this novel, his characters are so one-dimensional and (honestly?) stupid that I felt like I was visualizing people who walk around hitting themselves in the head and saying, “Duh…� all the time. Sophie ought to have the Women’s Movement screaming in outrage. Brown presents her as a highly trained and expert cryptographer, yet she fumbles around repeatedly, never seems to remember anything until something Robert Langdon says or does triggers some old memory, and then solves something even before she has all the information she needs. At one point she asks Langdon, “Sangrael… does it have anything to do with blood?� Come on, Sophie! You know three languages!! She is far too constantly confused to be the policewoman and cryptologist that Brown writes her out to be.
By the same token, Langdon has spent his life becoming one of the foremost symbology experts in the world but it takes him pages to see that what he is looking at is a recreation of Leonardo’s “Vitruvian Man� when I knew what Sauniere had done as soon as Brown described the crime scene.
Yes, I think we’ve all been led a merry chase by Mr. Brown. Unsatisfied with a mere 15 minutes of fame, he has chosen to take on the most controversial of subjects, challenging the foundations of religion and faith (primarily Christianity) and thus assuring a long walk in the spotlight. So far he has managed three years. On his website, he claims to be a Christian, but my theory is that the whole book is the apologetic treatise of a lapsed Catholic who has been seriously damaged and disappointed by his church. I understand that the Masons are next. Let the fun begin!
17 Comments:
You know, I really found this article interesting, but it's almost like I am reading the exact opposite of the Da Vinci Code.
I just finished a university course called "Jesus of Nazareth", so I dont think that I know everything there is to know about early Christianity, but I have learned some things.
First off, you are arguing nothing with nothing. Dan Brown presents fiction in his book, but at the same time, what do we know as real concrete facts about Jesus' time? Nothing, there is very little that can be substantaited with cold hard proof. Even the gospels cannot be cited as historical because of their unknown origins, and the many thories that state Mark was the basis for Matthew and Luke altogether (Tatum, "in quest of Jesus", 1999)
The fact is, anyone who takes whatever Dan Brown says seriously does not have the ability to think for themselves. It is really not likely that everything Dan Brown says is true, but there is a small chance. There are so many unknowns within the history of Christianity and the groups that surround it. One thing is for sure, it has created a buzz, and a buzz about the church, something they are having a hard time doing on their own nowadays. I know personally after reading the Da Vinci code, and reading about teh somewhat human aspects of Jesus, it made me want to learn more, and think about my faith again which had fallen by the wayside for a few years.
I just think it is pretty harsh to rag on a fiction novel... who cares if he says its a fact, people need to be able to judge for themselves and not be satisfied with the answers Google provides. I realize that part of your argument is that SOME people still do this, but some people believe everything they see on TV too, and some people believe in conspiracy theories online. People can believe different things, fact or fiction... its a personal thing.
I think people should just stop harping on the book, its a good page-turner that makes you think a little bit. I'm definitely going to see the movie, and I hope Dan Brown takes his $12 from me for the movie and $20 for the book and buys a house with it and the rest of the money he gets... good for him for writing such a great read.
Daniel
PS. I dont think its fair that you can present "facts" in your article either that aren't necessarily true but you assume the reader will believe you. For example, Mary Magdalene was said to be the first to see the resurrected Jesus by only ONE of the canonical gospels, and only ONE of the dozens of non canonical gospels (oddly enough, its the one written by her). So don't Bash brown for assuming peoples' incompetence if you are just going to employ the same tactics.
Dear Anonymous or Daniel?
First of all, it thrills me to see that the whole DC hype has made you re-examine your faith. I hope and pray that you will find the true Jesus.
However, your comment of "arguing nothing from nothing" apparently stems from a misreading of paragraph 5. Both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible are historically supported by thousands of manuscripts and fragments and scrolls (Dead Sea found in the 1940's & 50's). The New Tesatament alone, which is the story of Jesus, has 5,600 copies and fragments which are in the original Greek. The entire New Testament can be reconstructed outside the Bible, except for 11 minor verses, from the early church leaders who wrote in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD. The parts of Scripture that are missing are less than 1/4 of one percent. On the other hand, Homer's Illiad has a 5 percent question of text and no seems concerned about the integrity of his work.
The gospel of Mary is not included in the canon of scripture because it does not have historically supported documentation. The Gospel of Luke does and so I have full faith in his recounting of Mary's meeting with the resurrected Jesus. The larger problem here is that to date...no one has offered solid, tangible, historical evidence for any of the conspiracy theories Brown puts forth in DC. Everybody talks about their existence, but nobody seems to be able to produce them.
I agree with you that it is harsh to "rag on a fiction novel." I think I established at the beginning of my review that it appalled me that a fiction book has become such an iconoclastic treatise on religion and faith. I think if you would reread my review and then read what you wrote that you would see that you are indeed supporting my arguments and have been harsher than I.
I never "assume the reader will [just]believe me." I forgive you for the implication that I am an uninformed talking head, and I assure you that I do not present material that I have not thought about, prayed over, and studied thoroughly. I didn't begin the discussion on DC but welcome the conversations that have come about because of it, if they are conversations worth having. I just feel that life is too short to spend good time discussing or arguing about conspiracies that cannot be substantiated in any way. I also find it interesting that people say this novel questions the "church" when, in truth, it only really deeply questions one denomination - the Catholic.
Here's to keeping fiction fiction!
I can see no falisies under the "Facts" heading in The Da Vinci Code. He is merely presenting the facts that Opus Dei and the Priory of Sion exist and that documention, artwork, ritual, etc. are not made up. Never is it stated as "fact" that Jesus was married and had a child. That is the fiction part. It is a theory that has been presented that suggest its validity. One side of the argument is presented in the book and it is left up to the reader to decide whether or not they feel it is valid.
I don't know why people are misconstrueing this book like so, maybe it is because it contradicts what they were taught and it makes logical sense. I mean, I wouldn't put it past the early church to manipulate documents after events such as the Inquisition and the sale of indulges (nothing to do with mis-documentation, I know, but the point is the immorality of these). Men run the church, not God, and they aren't always the most moral of people (especially in the earlier develpment of the church). Most people have a tendency of putting a personal twist on their convictions. Sometimes these people come into power and force those convictions on others. This is how history is written.
There is no right or wrong. There are different degrees of truth and there is speculation. I don't trust everything that the church tells me, but that doesn't make me an atheist. So what IF Jesus had a wife and child.... just take what's thrown at you and either reject it or adapt to it.
-Josh M.
Josh said "there is no right or wrong"... you sound so sure of yourself, almost as if you knew you were RIGHT.
-BL
Josh's statement, "there is no right or wrong" is self-defeating.
If there is no right or wrong, then his absolute claim about right or wrong cannot be right.
Also, the gospels were all written by eye-witnesses or acquaintances of the eye-witnesses of Christ's death and resurrecton long before the end of the first century. With so many Jews and Romans present who were hostile to Christianity around, it would have been easy for them to stamp out Christianity if it were false. We have Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter,James,and Jude all writing about the truth of Christianity before 70 AD.
Name some first century authors who wrote arguments against Christianity.
Harry Diehl
Harry Diehl
You know I believe in Jesus and I believe that He was sent here on this wicked earth to die so you and I could have a chance for salvation. God loves us so much-despite us being so entwined by evil- he loves us and wants to make us good, Holy and pure. Why would some one pick on a man who loves mankind and willingly died for it. I think this book is just a mockery and it hurts and offends every person who loves jesus and every person who belives that life will get better. It mocks what people are doing everyday to spread His love, and those who only have Jesus. Dont make fun of Jesus because He's the on in Heaven pleading for you and begging for the Lord to forgive you when you do wrong. He loves and died for us and this is how we say thanks? We might as well write make up stories about the holocaust and ridicule all the families that died or say the Darfur really doesnt have a genocide going on it's all just make believe...
Carla Bunn Johnson Lewis - Seattle, WA
While I do not try to say I am a biblical scholar, I am thankful to have the opportunity to post my own "opinion." I am SO thankful to God that He loved us first and that He came to earth in the flesh, resigned to a horrible death, just so we would have the opportunity for eternity. And, while I read 3/4 of the Davinci Code - realized what it was suggesting, stopped reading and tossed the book in the garbage - it didn't change what "I" know to be truth in one little bit. I am, however, concerned for all the people who are not believers and claim to be searching for the "truth" and for those who wouldn't believe anyway. They will cling to anything they can find that suggests Jesus was not Holy, was not Righteous, but a sinner like we are. And they'll use that to support their reasons for not believing, suggesting that the bible is a hoax. Well, I suppose that's their right, in that God did not turn us into puppets but has given us the opportunity to choose to believe whatever we want. But, the one thing that I do know is that if you believe in God, you have to know that the enemy is real. And it is his job to do whatever he can to keep those who don't know Jesus from ever really knowing him. The book is one of his little tools. The other thing I know is that God said He can watch over His Word. So, I don't have to. But, I know that God will continue to open the door for us who will, to minister and WITNESS to those who are in need of a Savior. They'll see beyond the lies of The Davinci Code and know that God is real and that Jesus IS Who He says He is because He write it upon their hearts.
God - noun
The supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in monotheistic religions.
--
If God is omnipotent (Having unlimited or universal power) then it is hard for me to imagine anything that occurs as not being as he/she/it desires. I don't think the concept of desire exists, from God's pov. Everything that happens is how things are supposed to be. I can't imagine and 'all-powerful' being not having his way.
I find it rediculous that a book can't be written with a different theory on Christianity without people freaking out about it. I don't understand why people get so angry about religious beliefs. It is a book, and a good one. It was fun, and had some interesting thoughts. It is time that people of religion stopped taking themselves so seriously.
I find it rediculous that a book can't be written with a different theory on Christianity without people freaking out about it. I don't understand why people get so angry about religious beliefs. It is a book, and a good one. It was fun, and had some interesting thoughts. It is time that people of religion stopped taking themselves so seriously.
OK, so Christians are over-reacting. Let's try a different religion... say Islam. Let's write that the kings at the time of Mohammed's rise and prophesying were playing poker and the one who lost had to become a "prophet". And there are all kinds of documents and "evidence" to prove it. So... I write a book about that (assuming there would be no death theats on my life) and make lots of money, and insist that everything I wrote is a "fact".
And there's no problem with that?
Great! I'll get right on it!
Tisha
Here’s a few glaring examples where Dan Brown as writer and his wife as researcher deliberately knew the facts and put the opposite in the book.
1. Professor Teabrig reads from Leonardo’s Notebooks to show Sophie that Da Vinci believed the New Testament was “delusions and false miracles, deceiving a stupid multitude� and “blinding ignorance does mislead us�. Dan Brown quotes the Gutenberg library in his sources. Go to the Gutenberg on line library, look up the da Vinci Notebooks and find the quotes. I’ll save you some trouble, quote 1208 is clearly headed “Against Alchemists� and quote1182 is about “vain splendour�.
2. Brown’s character Teabing states the Gnostic Gospels teach Jesus wanted Mary Magdalene to be the head of the church after he was gone. Go to the Gnostic Gospels on line, look up the Gospel of Thomas 12. The disciples said to Jesus� We know that you will leave us. Who will be our leader?� Jesus said to them, “Wherever you are, you are to go to James the Just. For his sake heaven and earth came into being.�
Teabrig quotes from the Gospel of Philip “the disciples asked “why do you love her more then all of us?�� He doesn’t finish the quote “The Saviour answered and said to them, “Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness, they are no different from one another.�
3. Did Constantine and the Council of Nicea rewrite the history books about Jesus? Did early Christians not believe Jesus was divine? Da Vinci Code’s character Leigh Teabing asserts that until the Council of Nicea 325 CE “Jesus was viewed by His followers as a mortal prophet� and not the divine Son of God. Those who believed he was divine barely won in a “close� vote.
The vote at the Council of Nicea on whether Jesus was the divine Son of God was actually 2 against (he was mortal) and the rest (about 300) for (he was divine). That was not a close vote. Just look up Council of Nicea and you’ll find out.
4. Is the figure to Jesus right in the Last Supper painting “without a doubt, female� (bosom, long hair, demure face) and not John? The Last Supper started deteriorating soon after it was completed. It was restored as much as possible between 1979 and 1999 but parts of the original paint are gone. John’s so called “bosom� is a crack in the painting. Jesus and most of the disciples have long hair. Da Vinci’s painting of St. John the Baptist also has a “demure� face but you can see he’s male because his upper body is naked. Just look at the painting of John the Baptist in the Wilderness. You can see it online.
I think it would be fair to quote Leondardo’s Quote number 1194 here.
“Be not false about the past.�
Have you not heard of the fact we have free will given to us by Him...we would just be robots otherwise and that is one of the basis's of the faith..God wants us to chose His way and believe in His Son whom will not be praying for our forgiveness in Heaven, but whom will be the One judging us on reserrection day...Please learn about Christianity before you mock it or say we take things too seriously...it is the most serious matter of all...your salvation...
Kathy, you rock!
My statement of the day: If this book (or movie...or any other work of fiction) is enough to challenge someone's faith, I question whether that faith even existed in the first place.
Wake me when this is all over...
I dont care how you look at it this book is Blasphemy. I will say this, this is not the first time the deity of Christ has come under attack, and it will not be the last. I pray that Dan Brown realizes how satan has used him and repents. Proverbs 12:19 "The lip of truth shall be established for ever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment"
Dan Brown raised some important historical questions about 'christian' origins for a creaking institution, but the real threat to the 'church' comes from elsewhere:
The first wholly new interpretation for 2000 years of the moral teachings of Jesus the Christ, entitled The Final Freedoms, focuses specifically and comprehensively on marriage and human sexuality, challenging natural law theory and theology. At stake are several thousand years of religious tradition and history.
What at first appears an utterly preposterous challenge to the religious status quo rewards those who persevere in closer examination, for it carries within its pages an idea both subtle and sublime, what the combined intellectual histories of religion and science have either ignored or dismissed as impossible. An error of presumption which could now leave tradition staring into the abyss and humble the heights of scientific speculation. For if this material is confirmed, and there appears to be both the means and a concerted effort to authenticate it, the greatest unresolved questions of human existence may finally have been untangled.
Published only on the web and distributed freely as a pdf download, made up of twenty nine chapters and three hundred and seventy pages, this new teaching has nothing whatsoever to do with any existing religious conception known to history. It is unique in every respect.
Using a synthesis of hundreds of scriptural elements from the Old and New Testaments, the Apocrypha , The Dead Sea Scrolls,The Nag Hammadi Library, and some of the worlds greatest poetry, it describes and teaches a single moral LAW, a single moral principle and offers its own proof; one in which the reality of God responds to an act of perfect faith with a direct, individual intervention into the natural world; making a correction to human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness, human ethical perception, and providing new, primary insight and understanding of the human condition.
Also called the Gospel of the Resurrection, this new interpretation reveals the moral foundation of all human thought and conduct and finds expression within a new covenant of human spiritual union, the marriage [Hieros gamos] between one man and one woman. It resolves the most intractable questions and issues of human sexuality and offers possibilities for peace, health, healing and cultural development political process has yet to dream of.
This new teaching is pure ethics. It requires no institutional framework, no churches, no priest craft, no scholastic theological rational, costs nothing and ‘worship’ requires only conviction, faith and the necessary measure of self discipline to accomplish a new moral imperative.
As the first ever religious teaching able to demonstrate its own efficacy, the first ever religious claim to knowledge that meets both the ideal and criteria of the most rigourous, testable scientific method, this teaching enters the public domain as a reality entirely new to human history.
The beginnings of an intellectual and moral revolution are unfolding on the web. And anyone trying to imagine where solutions to the worlds most difficult conundrums will come from, may comprehend from this material, the catalyst that might very well define the very future of humanity and the earth itself!
Download links: http://www.energon.uklinux.net
http://thefinalfreedoms.bulldoghome.com
Josh, the Priory of Sion was a fraud admitted by its authors after the fact. They even sued Dan Brown for ripping off their book back when the DC came out.
Personally, I had heard that at least it was a good mystery and was very disappointed that the story was so internally inconsistent. So the Knights Templar dug up Christian-related stuff from a temple destroyed 500+ years before Jesus' time, including the body of Mary Magdeline, who had retired to the south of France? The Christian's wrote the female goddess out of Genesis? Walt Disney (died in 1966)put a bunch of symbolism in The Little Mermaid (1989)? The good guys win and keep the bad guys from keeping "the truth" buried, and they... keep the truth buried. The whole thing was pointless - now that's a brilliant plot twist. This "mystery" wouldn't even make a good cartoon.
Sherlock Holmes
Dear Kathy and who ever reads this,
I think that i am very strong in my christian faith even though i am 13 but i still liked this book. I think that it was a great fiction book but people shouldn't be taking their anger issues about how people pick on christians and get away with it most of the time.
I also don't think that Sophie Neveu fumbles around alot or how she constantly forgets stuff. Well, wouldn't you constantly forget stuff if your only family member just died and that you are just now understanding things in your family life. I think that she is the cryptoligist that she is.
I also believe that you shouldn't rag on fictional books. I mean come on it's fictional! You can't say "none of the stuff in that book is true" I mean come on well duh none of it's true it's FISTIONAL!
Even though i am a Christian young women i absolutly LOVE this book. Though I don't believe anything is true this is a great book to read and i sudgest it and the prequel, Angels & Demons. But if your not a good reader at all then i suggest you don't read this it is very hard to follow. Even though I'm 13 it was a easy book (to me) to read and again i suggest it and it's prequel.
I agree with Daniel's last paragraph and the first sentence of his P.S.
Addison Tweedy
Bethalto, Illinios
P.S. I don't think that he got carried away with his obessions it was an awesome book.
Post a Comment
<< Home