Tuesday, May 31, 2005

May viewing journal

5-1-05 - Napoleon Dynamite
5-3-05 - Envy
5-5-05 - Oceans 12
5-10-05 - Crash favorite for the month
5-14-05 - Because of Winn Dixie
5-18-05 - 61*
5-18-05 - Layer Cake
5-21-05 - Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room
5-21-05 - Veronica Guerin
5-27-05 - Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith
5-29-05 - Cinderella Man
5-30-05 - Brothers
5-30-05 - My Life Without Me
5-31-05 - Wilbur Wants to Kill Himself

I think that gets me to 95 features for the year. Here is the list of films I've seen this year.

Monday, May 30, 2005

Cinderella Man

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections


05.jpg (50 K)Cinderella Man will likely have large crowds and lots of happy people after they’ve seen the film. It will likely get favorable reviews (probably many raves) and people are already talking about Oscar nominations. I don’t begrudge Cinderella Man any of this. It is a well made, uplifting film that speaks to the hope that the American dream holds out to those who need a little bit of luck or a second chance.

06.jpg (128 K)But (and from the previous paragraph you knew there had to be a “but�) after seeing the film, I just felt there was something missing. Maybe it’s because as well done as it is, it doesn’t make the top of any of the genres you could put it in. Ali, Raging Bull, Million Dollar Baby, and even the better films in the Rocky series are better boxing movies. Seabiscuit is a better “hope-of-the-nation-in-the-midst-of-depression� film. Gladiator is better with Russell Crowe as someone who’s lost everything and gets back to the top to fight the bad guy. Still, Cinderella Man is a good film. It just doesn’t make it to greatness.

19.jpg (103 K)I think one of the things that I find wanting is that the main character, James L. Braddock is such a nice guy. That sounds strange that I don’t want him to be so nice, but he is flawless. He never loses his temper. He never does anything that even borders on being wrong. Even when Max Baer (the incarnation of evil in the film) says things about Braddock’s wife, Jimmy does nothing while his manager and his wife respond in justified anger.

24.jpg (194 K)That lack of any flaws makes Braddock rather uninteresting. True, his rise from the soup line to fighting for the title is inspirational, but the only thing he has battled is luck. Things were hard for many during the Great Depression, which made people identify with Braddock. But it is hard to imagine a man as bland as Braddock is in this film managing to gather the attention of the nation.

44.jpg (109 K)It could be that Ron Howard is creating a black and white world. Braddock is the good guy, Max Baer the bad guy (although he was not as malicious as he’s portrayed in the film.) Braddock is the guy who can’t pay his electric bill; Baer lives large as the world champion. Braddock is a family man; Baer is always in the company of two women. Braddock represents wholesomeness.

Therein is part of the problem. It’s easy to cheer on a wholesome hero fighting against external forces of evil. But far more satisfying, at least from my point of view, are those heroes who struggle to overcome the weaknesses in themselves to find success.

Don’t get me wrong. This is a film worth seeing and enjoying. Certainly, you could do worse for a summer flick than Cinderella Man. You may even come away from the film inspired to push on against a tide of bad luck in your own life.

—Overview
—Photos
—About this Film
—Spiritual Connections

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Manson's Memo 5/25

Earlier this month, Jane and I made our first trip to New York City. It is a place that seems familiar to many people because we’ve seen it in movies and heard stories (often horror stories) about New York and New Yorkers.

We discovered that New York is really many places all together. Times Square is full of people all the time. But not far away, there are interesting neighborhoods with their own character.

Central Park is a green place surrounded by large buildings. But there are other parks all around Manhattan (easily seen from atop the Empire State Building). Riverside Park was especially nice.

A trip over to Brooklyn netted us a cup of what may be the world’s best hot chocolate (available with or without chiles), and the beauty of the Brooklyn Botanical Garden at the perfect time of year for nearly everything to be in bloom.

We ate BBQ, bagels, cheesecake, Indian food, pizza, homemade pasta in Little Italy, sandwiches from a kosher deli. The only real disappointment was the hot dog stand hot dog.

In short, New York can’t really be put into a stereotype. It is full of diversity, like all large cities are. And that diversity is what gives New York its life.

Our communities are also becoming more and more diverse. Many people yearn for the time when we seemed to be more homogenous. But we would miss so much without the many things others bring to our communities.

We are reminded that God does not make us all the same. We are short and tall, male and female, dark skinned and light, some are more intelligent than others, some are faster than others. We hold different ideas and different values. And because of these differences, there may be friction, but there is also growth as we interact.

What a wonderful blessing we have in God's variety.

Monday, May 23, 2005

Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room

Late in 2001 the energy company Enron, not long before the darling of investors, filed for bankruptcy. Thousands of workers were suddenly without a job. Billions of dollars were lost by investors (including many of the unemployed workers who had invested in company stock.) A few of the officers of the company managed to get out with several million dollars before the bottom fell out.

The story of Enron is one that is filled with greed, with hubris, with injustice, and with fraud. Some of those involved are facing legal prosecution. There will be a great deal of finger pointing, denying involvement and blaming other.

The story of Enron’s rise and collapse is told in Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room. It is told not by telling us about numbers and accounting, but by telling us about people: Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, Andy Fastow. We are told in the film that this top echelon of the corporation set the tone for a greed that permeated the company. The whole idea was to get as much as you can for yourself without regard to anyone else.

In some ways, this is what Capitalism is about. Among the foundations of Capitalism is self-interest. We work and invest to make money for ourselves. There is room for concern for others, but that too is often a part of our own self-interest. Through the years our culture has reined in Capitalism a bit, trying to soften the abuses it can lead to. We do this with regulations that protect workers, shareholders and the public.

Even with all the regulations in place, Enron managed to show the darkest side of unrestrained Capitalism. Lies were told to investors that made the company look more profitable than it was. Money and debt were moved around. Accounting was done in spurious manners. Advantage was taken of vulnerable situations (such as California’s deregulated power grid). Anything that either brought money in or made it look like money was brought in was done without regard for ethics or morality or who would be hurt.

And the winners were not the owners of the company (shareholders), it was those who were playing fast and loose with the rules and pocketing what they could get.

But it didn’t happen in a vacuum. Large investment banks signed off on the things Enron was doing, because they believed that they would make money as well. Accountants approved Enron’s books. (It should be noted that the accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, lost credibility and went out of business in the aftermath of Enron.)

The films serves as an indictment of Lay, Skilling, Fastow, and many unnamed employees who acted with total indifference to morality – one could even characterize their attitude as bordering on malice. The film already has its mind made up as to the guilt of those involved. It includes bits that imply a guilt by association of both Presidents Bush and of California Governor Arnold Schwazenegger, even though the film presents no real evidence that any of them were involved in events that led to the collapse of Enron, only friendship with those involved. As such, the film may come across as more political than it should be.

It would be easy to watch this film and sit in judgment on those who orchestrated Enron’s business practices. Viewers may well come away wanting justice and punishment for those under indictment.

But we should also note that in many ways, Enron represents what we all want. It was the poster child for business success. It had new, innovative ideas for the marketplace. It built the better mousetrap, and was reaping the rewards. We all want to have success. Even as we disparage CEOs and sports professionals for their high salaries, we envy them. We want to be “the smartest guys in the room.�

Because the greed and arrogance were out of control and because Enron was such a large corporation, the repercussions of the actions by Enron’s corporate leaders (and the employees who followed their lead) damaged many lives in significant ways.

Perhaps we should note that our actions also grow out of the same forces that shaped Enron. Because we act on a smaller scale, our greed and hubris may have smaller effects, but they still have effects in people’s lives. Perhaps we should see the evil that led to the fall of Enron and the pain it brought to many lives as a matter of degree as compared to some of the things that many people do every day.

The opening shot in the film is a church tower with a sign that reads, “Jesus saves.� The camera pans back to show the corporate offices towering over this. Perhaps the filmmaker wanted to emphasize the way a corporate culture dwarfs the values that we want to have. But it also, I think, serves as a reminder as we enter the film that ultimately, self-interest is not the way of Christ. We remember that reconciliation with God comes by way of one who “emptied himself� for us.

Sunday, May 15, 2005

Reflection on Crash

The opening lines in Crash are from Detective Graham Waters, who has just been in a traffic accident, being philosophical about L.A. versus other big cities. He points out that in other cities there are crowds and people bump into one another all the time. But L.A. is a city on wheels. We are always surrounded by steel and glass, and so, he concludes, we crash into each other just to have some human contact.

I live in the L.A. area, but strangely enough, I saw Crash while on vacation in New York, one of those cities where people do bump into each other all day long – trying to cross a street with a mass of people headed toward each other, or on the shuttle between Time Square and Grand Central when you step into an absolutely packed subway car certain that you’re the last to fit in, but a dozen more people get through the door behind you. Those crowds, it seems to me, can be just as isolating as single driver vehicles. You are together, and even touching, but you aren’t really interacting.

(That is not to say that New York isn’t a friendly city; you get to meet some interesting people standing in lines or sitting in a park. But all that vanishes in the world of the crush when you don’t even make eye contact.)

But really, the film isn’t about L.A. (although that city does give the film its character). The film is about how we relate to “the other� – those who are different from us, most easily seen through race. This may be the best film dealing with racism ever made. The only film I’d put at the same level is Do the Right Thing.

What made seeing this film in New York really striking was that the next morning my wife and I visited Ellis Island, the gateway for millions of immigrants through much of the last century. Men, women and children passed through the staircases and halls of Ellis Island wanting a chance in America. They were from Sweden, from Ireland, from Italy, from Poland, from countries that no longer exist. Here the Tower of Babel was not a story, but life. Languages and cultures came together on this small island, and then dispersed throughout the country.

And they weren’t always welcomed. There have often been those who complained about “the others� who were coming into our communities, taking our jobs, filling our schools, corrupting our culture. The Irish, the Italians, the Vietnamese, the Persians, the Mexicans (by which we mean anyone from Central America, regardless of their nationality) all have been targets of the kind of racist venom that fills Crash.

In the opening scene, the two women who were driving the cars in the accident (one Hispanic, one Asian) each claim the other is a worse driver because of their race. One of the ways we often speak of “the other� – their lack of driving ability. I expect that if we’d had as many automobiles a hundred years ago, we’d have said the Irish were rotten drivers.

But the fact of racism goes much deeper than all those bad drivers (be they Asians, women, Arabs, or just whatever race of person just cut you off.) Racism, as shown in Crash, is the melding of our fears, our angers, and our frustrations. It is dehumanizing in that we direct our pain at “the other� – usually without even recognizing that the fear and anger is not from them, it comes from us. “The other� becomes the object on which we project all the pain within us and seek to place that pain on them. It never takes the fear or pain away from us, though. Instead it continues to compound the fears and prejudices we all have of each other. Even without our being conscious of them, those anxieties don’t just damage the ones at whom they are directed; they eat away at our souls and at the soul of our society. We are all victims of racism. Some are affected more than others, but we all have the wounds deep within.

Crash is a violent film (as the title implies). There is physical violence, but even more verbal, psychological violence. Much of the film feels like an assault on the audience. We are meant to viscerally be “the other� that is bearing the brunt of these racist attacks. We are meant to see that even good people are infected by this terrible disease.

There is also a bit of redemption to be found as well. It’s not enough to show that even the best of us are flawed. We also have to know that we can overcome the sinful racism that is a part of us and our society. There are miracles of love and sacrifice that call us to remember that even the most hate-filled person can rise above the hatred to bring light into what seems utter darkness.

Ellis Island represents our past, but also our present. Millions of people in America today can trace their ancestors to Ellis Island. It served as a gateway to America (as well as a barrier to some). Others came to these shores without choice, in the hold of slave ships. Still others continue to come, both legally and illegally. We are a nation of immigrants. We are a nation of “others�. Whether in our cars on the L.A. freeways or in the crush of people in Times Square, we need to learn how to go from bumping into each other to being in contact with each other. In that are the seeds of hope of overcoming the racism in our lives.

Sunday, May 01, 2005

April 2005 viewing journal

4-1 -
Spartan
4-4 -
Taxi Driver
4-6 -
Men With Brooms
4-9 -
The Ballad of Jack and Rose
4-15 -
Look at Me
4-20 -
The Upside of Anger
4-23 -
The Hobart Shakespeareans (favorite for the month)
4-23 -
The Raven (short)
4-23 -
Walking on the Sky
4-24 -
Frisbee: The Life and Death of a Hippie Preacher
4-26 -
First Morning (Buoi Sang Dau Nam)
4-27 -
Anna und der Soldat (short)
4-27 -
Echostop (short)
4-27 -
West Bank Story (short)
4-27 -
Fragile (short)
4-28 -
Places in the Heart
4-29 -
Bobby Jones: Stroke of Genius
4-30 -
Seducing Dr. Lewis